Role of computed tomography and chest radiography in imaging of Impella heart pump and associated complications.

IF 1.1 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Journal of Clinical Imaging Science Pub Date : 2025-04-30 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.25259/JCIS_130_2024
Timothy Hoang, Timothy M Baran, Mark Marinescu, Aniruddh Mandalapu, Abhishek Chaturvedi
{"title":"Role of computed tomography and chest radiography in imaging of Impella heart pump and associated complications.","authors":"Timothy Hoang, Timothy M Baran, Mark Marinescu, Aniruddh Mandalapu, Abhishek Chaturvedi","doi":"10.25259/JCIS_130_2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objectives of the study are to identify usefulness of chest radiography (CXR) and computed tomography (CT) for the assessment of optimal Impella positioning compared to echocardiography.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, records of 500 patients were reviewed, 95 subjects met the inclusion criteria. The distance from the carina, top of the aortic arch, and in case of CT, from the aortic valve plane to the Impella inlet port was measured. Subjects were stratified into two groups based on echocardiography: Those that did require repositioning and those that did not.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CT revealed greater distance from the carina to the aortic valve plane in patients requiring Impella repositioning compared to those which did not (81.6 ± 15.9 mm vs. 67 ± 13.2 mm, <i>P</i> = 0.019). The distance from the aortic valve plane to the Impella inlet was shorter in repositioned cases on CT (22.3 ± 28.6 mm vs. 35.8 ± 13.3 mm, <i>P</i> = 0.045). The expected location of the aortic valve plane was 6.8 ± 1.3 cm from the carina among CT cases, representing a useful measurement for evaluation on CXR. Significant predictors of aortic valve plane to carina distance on CT were found to be aortic arch to Impella outlet on CXR (<i>P</i> < 0.0001) and carina to Impella outlet on CXR (<i>P</i> < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CT imaging correctly identified patients that required repositioning on echocardiography. Key CT measurements serve as crucial indicators for repositioning and there is notable agreement on measurements across CXR and CT as well as CT and echocardiography in identification of Impella high or low positioning. In addition, there is evidence of significant predictors of CT measurements from CXR.</p>","PeriodicalId":15512,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Imaging Science","volume":"15 ","pages":"14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12057210/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Imaging Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/JCIS_130_2024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The objectives of the study are to identify usefulness of chest radiography (CXR) and computed tomography (CT) for the assessment of optimal Impella positioning compared to echocardiography.

Material and methods: In this retrospective study, records of 500 patients were reviewed, 95 subjects met the inclusion criteria. The distance from the carina, top of the aortic arch, and in case of CT, from the aortic valve plane to the Impella inlet port was measured. Subjects were stratified into two groups based on echocardiography: Those that did require repositioning and those that did not.

Results: CT revealed greater distance from the carina to the aortic valve plane in patients requiring Impella repositioning compared to those which did not (81.6 ± 15.9 mm vs. 67 ± 13.2 mm, P = 0.019). The distance from the aortic valve plane to the Impella inlet was shorter in repositioned cases on CT (22.3 ± 28.6 mm vs. 35.8 ± 13.3 mm, P = 0.045). The expected location of the aortic valve plane was 6.8 ± 1.3 cm from the carina among CT cases, representing a useful measurement for evaluation on CXR. Significant predictors of aortic valve plane to carina distance on CT were found to be aortic arch to Impella outlet on CXR (P < 0.0001) and carina to Impella outlet on CXR (P < 0.0001).

Conclusions: CT imaging correctly identified patients that required repositioning on echocardiography. Key CT measurements serve as crucial indicators for repositioning and there is notable agreement on measurements across CXR and CT as well as CT and echocardiography in identification of Impella high or low positioning. In addition, there is evidence of significant predictors of CT measurements from CXR.

计算机断层和胸片在Impella心脏泵及相关并发症成像中的作用。
目的:本研究的目的是确定胸部x线摄影(CXR)和计算机断层扫描(CT)与超声心动图相比评估最佳Impella定位的有效性。材料与方法:本研究回顾性分析了500例患者的资料,95例符合纳入标准。测量距胸突、主动脉弓顶部的距离,在CT情况下,测量距主动脉瓣平面到Impella进气道的距离。根据超声心动图将受试者分为两组:需要重新定位的组和不需要重新定位的组。结果:CT显示需要Impella复位的患者与不需要Impella复位的患者相比,隆突到主动脉瓣平面的距离更大(81.6±15.9 mm比67±13.2 mm, P = 0.019)。CT显示,复位组主动脉瓣平面到Impella入口的距离较短(22.3±28.6 mm vs. 35.8±13.3 mm, P = 0.045)。在CT病例中,主动脉瓣平面的预期位置为距隆突6.8±1.3 cm,为CXR评估提供了一个有用的测量。CT上主动脉瓣平面到凸突距离的显著预测因子为CXR上主动脉弓到Impella出口的距离(P < 0.0001)和CXR上凸突到Impella出口的距离(P < 0.0001)。结论:CT能正确识别超声心动图上需要重新定位的患者。关键的CT测量值是重新定位的关键指标,在识别Impella高或低定位时,CXR和CT以及CT和超声心动图的测量值有显著的一致性。此外,有证据表明,CT测量的显著预测来自CXR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Imaging Science
Journal of Clinical Imaging Science RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Imaging Science (JCIS) is an open access peer-reviewed journal committed to publishing high-quality articles in the field of Imaging Science. The journal aims to present Imaging Science and relevant clinical information in an understandable and useful format. The journal is owned and published by the Scientific Scholar. Audience Our audience includes Radiologists, Researchers, Clinicians, medical professionals and students. Review process JCIS has a highly rigorous peer-review process that makes sure that manuscripts are scientifically accurate, relevant, novel and important. Authors disclose all conflicts, affiliations and financial associations such that the published content is not biased.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信