A Phase 2 Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Metopimazine Mesylate (NG101) in Participants with Gastroparesis.

Jack Loesch,Eyad Hamza,Pankaj J Pasricha,Judy Nee,Michael Cline,James MacDougall,Madison Simons,John T Brown,Samita Garg,Matthew Hoscheit,Scott Gabbard,Cyril De Colle,Anthony Lembo
{"title":"A Phase 2 Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Metopimazine Mesylate (NG101) in Participants with Gastroparesis.","authors":"Jack Loesch,Eyad Hamza,Pankaj J Pasricha,Judy Nee,Michael Cline,James MacDougall,Madison Simons,John T Brown,Samita Garg,Matthew Hoscheit,Scott Gabbard,Cyril De Colle,Anthony Lembo","doi":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nThere is an urgent need for effective and safe treatment of gastroparesis. Metopimazine, a selective, peripherally restricted dopamine D2 receptor antagonist, is used in France for the symptomatic treatment of nausea and vomiting and chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.\r\n\r\nAIM\r\nTo assess the safety and efficacy of oral NG101, the mesylate salt of metopimazine, for the treatment of gastroparesis.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nWe conducted a 12-week phase 2 multicenter trial with NG101 5, 10, and 20 mg 4 times a day versus placebo. The primary endpoint was the change in mean nausea severity from the Diabetic and Idiopathic Gastroparesis Symptoms Daily Diary (DIGS-DD) during weeks 7-12 of the Treatment Period from baseline. The DIGS-DD measured nausea, abdominal pain, early satiety, postprandial fullness, and vomiting at their worst in the past 24 hours using a 0 to 10-point numeric rating scale. Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) questionnaires, including nausea, were assessed weekly using a 7-point balanced ordinal score.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nOf 161 randomized participants (45.3% diabetic and 54.7% idiopathic), mean DIGS-DD nausea severity scores decreased from baseline during Weeks 7-12 in all treatment groups, but these improvements were not statistically significant compared to placebo. However, there were statistically significant improvements in nausea PGI-C during Weeks 1-12 for all treatment groups compared with placebo. Trends in safety and efficacy favored patients with idiopathic gastroparesis compared to those with diabetic gastroparesis.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nWhile NG101 did not meet statistical significance in its primary endpoint for reducing nausea severity, it demonstrated a favorable safety profile and significant improvement in some secondary endpoints. Further study is needed to determine if NG101 is an effective treatment for patients with idiopathic gastroparesis.","PeriodicalId":520099,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000003534","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND There is an urgent need for effective and safe treatment of gastroparesis. Metopimazine, a selective, peripherally restricted dopamine D2 receptor antagonist, is used in France for the symptomatic treatment of nausea and vomiting and chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. AIM To assess the safety and efficacy of oral NG101, the mesylate salt of metopimazine, for the treatment of gastroparesis. METHODS We conducted a 12-week phase 2 multicenter trial with NG101 5, 10, and 20 mg 4 times a day versus placebo. The primary endpoint was the change in mean nausea severity from the Diabetic and Idiopathic Gastroparesis Symptoms Daily Diary (DIGS-DD) during weeks 7-12 of the Treatment Period from baseline. The DIGS-DD measured nausea, abdominal pain, early satiety, postprandial fullness, and vomiting at their worst in the past 24 hours using a 0 to 10-point numeric rating scale. Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) questionnaires, including nausea, were assessed weekly using a 7-point balanced ordinal score. RESULTS Of 161 randomized participants (45.3% diabetic and 54.7% idiopathic), mean DIGS-DD nausea severity scores decreased from baseline during Weeks 7-12 in all treatment groups, but these improvements were not statistically significant compared to placebo. However, there were statistically significant improvements in nausea PGI-C during Weeks 1-12 for all treatment groups compared with placebo. Trends in safety and efficacy favored patients with idiopathic gastroparesis compared to those with diabetic gastroparesis. CONCLUSION While NG101 did not meet statistical significance in its primary endpoint for reducing nausea severity, it demonstrated a favorable safety profile and significant improvement in some secondary endpoints. Further study is needed to determine if NG101 is an effective treatment for patients with idiopathic gastroparesis.
甲磺酸美托马嗪(NG101)治疗胃轻瘫患者的安全性和有效性的2期随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究
背景:迫切需要有效、安全的胃轻瘫治疗方法。美托吡嗪是一种选择性外周限制性多巴胺D2受体拮抗剂,在法国用于恶心呕吐和化疗引起的恶心呕吐的对症治疗。目的评价甲巯咪嗪甲磺酸盐NG101口服治疗胃轻瘫的安全性和有效性。方法:我们进行了一项为期12周的2期多中心试验,与安慰剂相比,NG101 5、10和20 mg每天4次。主要终点是治疗期7-12周期间糖尿病和特发性胃轻瘫症状每日日记(DIGS-DD)平均恶心严重程度的变化。DIGS-DD使用0到10分的数值评定量表测量过去24小时内最严重的恶心、腹痛、早期饱腹感、餐后饱腹感和呕吐。患者总体变化印象(PGI-C)问卷,包括恶心,每周使用7分平衡顺序评分进行评估。结果在161名随机受试者中(45.3%为糖尿病患者,54.7%为特发性),所有治疗组的DIGS-DD恶心严重程度评分在7-12周期间均较基线下降,但与安慰剂相比,这些改善无统计学意义。然而,与安慰剂相比,在1-12周期间,所有治疗组的恶心PGI-C均有统计学上的显著改善。与糖尿病性胃轻瘫患者相比,特发性胃轻瘫患者的安全性和有效性趋势更有利。结论NG101在减轻恶心严重程度的主要终点上没有达到统计学意义,但在一些次要终点上表现出良好的安全性和显著的改善。NG101是否是特发性胃轻瘫患者的有效治疗还需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信