Quality of Life in Heart Failure Patients: The Effect of Anxiety and Depression (Patient-Caregiver) and Caregivers' Quality of Life.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Athanasia Tsami, Ioannis Koutelekos, Georgia Gerogianni, Georgios Vasilopoulos, Niki Pavlatou, Antonia Kalogianni, Theodore Kapadochos, Angleliki Stamou, Maria Polikandrioti
{"title":"Quality of Life in Heart Failure Patients: The Effect of Anxiety and Depression (Patient-Caregiver) and Caregivers' Quality of Life.","authors":"Athanasia Tsami, Ioannis Koutelekos, Georgia Gerogianni, Georgios Vasilopoulos, Niki Pavlatou, Antonia Kalogianni, Theodore Kapadochos, Angleliki Stamou, Maria Polikandrioti","doi":"10.3390/jcdd12040137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients with heart failure (HF) and their caregivers are a dyad inextricably linked that exert influence on patients' quality of life (QoL).</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to explore factors affecting HF patients' QoL. Factors were: (a) HF patients' characteristics, (b) anxiety/depression of the dyad (patient-caregiver) and (c) caregivers' QoL.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, we enrolled 340 patients and 340 caregivers. Data collection was performed by the method of an interview using \"The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale\", HADS) to assess anxiety and depression (patient-caregiver) as well as the \"Minnesota Living with Heart Failure\" and the \"SF-36 Health Survey (SF-36)\" to assess QoL (patient-caregiver, respectively).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From the 340 dyads who comprised the sample, 81.3% and 77.5% of patients experienced anxiety and depression, respectively, while 79.3% and 62.2% of caregivers experienced anxiety and depression, respectively. A statistically significant difference between patients and caregivers was only detected for depression (<i>p</i> = 0.001) and not for anxiety (<i>p</i> = 0.567). Patients with scores in HADS that indicate anxiety and depression had a worse QoL (total, physical, and mental). All subscales of the caregiver's QoL were significantly associated with the patient's QoL (<i>p</i> < 0.001) apart from the physical functioning scale. The correlation coefficients were all negative, indicating that a better caregiver's QoL (higher SF36 scores) is associated with a better patient's QoL (lower Minnesota scores). After controlling for the patient's characteristics, the anxiety and depression of caregivers did not affect the patient's QoL (confounding effect) whereas the patient's anxiety/depression remained significant factors. Patients with anxiety and depression had 5.58 and 6.49 points, respectively, higher QoL score, meaning a worse QoL, compared to those with no anxiety/depression.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Evaluating the impact of HF on patients' QoL and anxiety/depression along with their caregivers permits acknowledgment of this dyadic relationship.</p>","PeriodicalId":15197,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease","volume":"12 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12027841/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd12040137","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patients with heart failure (HF) and their caregivers are a dyad inextricably linked that exert influence on patients' quality of life (QoL).

Purpose: The aim of this study was to explore factors affecting HF patients' QoL. Factors were: (a) HF patients' characteristics, (b) anxiety/depression of the dyad (patient-caregiver) and (c) caregivers' QoL.

Material and methods: In this cross-sectional study, we enrolled 340 patients and 340 caregivers. Data collection was performed by the method of an interview using "The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale", HADS) to assess anxiety and depression (patient-caregiver) as well as the "Minnesota Living with Heart Failure" and the "SF-36 Health Survey (SF-36)" to assess QoL (patient-caregiver, respectively).

Results: From the 340 dyads who comprised the sample, 81.3% and 77.5% of patients experienced anxiety and depression, respectively, while 79.3% and 62.2% of caregivers experienced anxiety and depression, respectively. A statistically significant difference between patients and caregivers was only detected for depression (p = 0.001) and not for anxiety (p = 0.567). Patients with scores in HADS that indicate anxiety and depression had a worse QoL (total, physical, and mental). All subscales of the caregiver's QoL were significantly associated with the patient's QoL (p < 0.001) apart from the physical functioning scale. The correlation coefficients were all negative, indicating that a better caregiver's QoL (higher SF36 scores) is associated with a better patient's QoL (lower Minnesota scores). After controlling for the patient's characteristics, the anxiety and depression of caregivers did not affect the patient's QoL (confounding effect) whereas the patient's anxiety/depression remained significant factors. Patients with anxiety and depression had 5.58 and 6.49 points, respectively, higher QoL score, meaning a worse QoL, compared to those with no anxiety/depression.

Conclusions: Evaluating the impact of HF on patients' QoL and anxiety/depression along with their caregivers permits acknowledgment of this dyadic relationship.

心衰患者的生活质量:焦虑和抑郁(患者-照顾者)与照顾者生活质量的影响
心力衰竭(HF)患者及其护理人员是密不可分的二元关系,对患者的生活质量(QoL)产生影响。目的:探讨影响心衰患者生活质量的因素。影响因素包括:(a) HF患者的特征,(b)患者-照顾者的焦虑/抑郁,(c)照顾者的生活质量。材料和方法:在这项横断面研究中,我们招募了340名患者和340名护理人员。数据收集采用访谈法,采用“医院焦虑和抑郁量表”(HADS)评估焦虑和抑郁(患者-照顾者),并采用“明尼苏达州心力衰竭患者生活”和“SF-36健康调查(SF-36)”评估生活质量(患者-照顾者)。结果:在组成样本的340对夫妇中,分别有81.3%和77.5%的患者感到焦虑和抑郁,而79.3%和62.2%的护理人员分别感到焦虑和抑郁。患者和护理人员之间仅在抑郁(p = 0.001)和焦虑(p = 0.567)方面存在统计学上的显著差异。HADS评分显示焦虑和抑郁的患者生活质量(总体、身体和精神)较差。除身体功能量表外,护理者生活质量的所有亚量表均与患者生活质量显著相关(p < 0.001)。相关系数均为负,表明护理者的生活质量越好(SF36评分越高),患者的生活质量越好(明尼苏达评分越低)。在控制了患者的特征后,护理者的焦虑和抑郁不影响患者的生活质量(混淆效应),而患者的焦虑/抑郁仍然是显著因素。焦虑和抑郁患者的生活质量得分分别为5.58分和6.49分,与无焦虑/抑郁患者相比,生活质量得分较高,生活质量较差。结论:评估心衰对患者生活质量和焦虑/抑郁的影响及其护理人员允许承认这种二元关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease
Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
381
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信