Co-occurring positive and negative prediction error signals are independent of stimulus repetition effects.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Sophie Siestrup, Lena Maria Leeners, Jennifer Pomp, Marlen A Roehe, Anoushiravan Zahedi, Ricarda I Schubotz
{"title":"Co-occurring positive and negative prediction error signals are independent of stimulus repetition effects.","authors":"Sophie Siestrup, Lena Maria Leeners, Jennifer Pomp, Marlen A Roehe, Anoushiravan Zahedi, Ricarda I Schubotz","doi":"10.1093/cercor/bhaf078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Both the absence of a predicted stimulus and the unexpected presentation of another stimulus result in increased activation in the areas processing the stimuli. These signals are termed negative and positive prediction errors, respectively. Here, we showed that both types of prediction errors can occur simultaneously and independently of stimulus repetition effects. Participants performed a reaction time task in a magnetic resonance scanner while being exposed to face and place stimuli with a distinct probabilistic distribution resulting in unexpected omissions and unexpected presentations of those stimuli. Participants' responses were significantly faster for expected as compared to neutral or unexpected trials, showing that they learned the statistical regularities inherent to the task. Moreover, the region of interest analysis of beta estimates extracted from the fusiform face area and the parahippocampal place area revealed co-occurring negative and positive prediction error signals. This was evidenced by increases in brain activation for unexpected omissions and unexpected presentations of visual stimuli when compared to expected stimuli. Our results also underlined that these effects occur independently of stimulus repetition effects. Altogether, these findings support a predictive coding model of cognition, highlighting the importance of considering the potential dual nature of expectation violations.</p>","PeriodicalId":9715,"journal":{"name":"Cerebral cortex","volume":"35 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cerebral cortex","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhaf078","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Both the absence of a predicted stimulus and the unexpected presentation of another stimulus result in increased activation in the areas processing the stimuli. These signals are termed negative and positive prediction errors, respectively. Here, we showed that both types of prediction errors can occur simultaneously and independently of stimulus repetition effects. Participants performed a reaction time task in a magnetic resonance scanner while being exposed to face and place stimuli with a distinct probabilistic distribution resulting in unexpected omissions and unexpected presentations of those stimuli. Participants' responses were significantly faster for expected as compared to neutral or unexpected trials, showing that they learned the statistical regularities inherent to the task. Moreover, the region of interest analysis of beta estimates extracted from the fusiform face area and the parahippocampal place area revealed co-occurring negative and positive prediction error signals. This was evidenced by increases in brain activation for unexpected omissions and unexpected presentations of visual stimuli when compared to expected stimuli. Our results also underlined that these effects occur independently of stimulus repetition effects. Altogether, these findings support a predictive coding model of cognition, highlighting the importance of considering the potential dual nature of expectation violations.

同时出现的正负预测误差信号不受刺激重复效应的影响。
预期刺激的缺失和另一个刺激的意外出现都会导致处理刺激区域的激活增加。这些信号分别被称为负预测误差和正预测误差。在这里,我们发现这两种类型的预测误差可以同时发生,并且独立于刺激重复效应。参与者在磁共振扫描仪中完成了一项反应时间任务,同时暴露在具有不同概率分布的面部和位置刺激下,导致这些刺激的意外遗漏和意外呈现。与中性或意外试验相比,参与者对预期试验的反应要快得多,这表明他们学会了任务固有的统计规律。此外,从梭状回脸区和海马旁区提取的β估计的兴趣区分析显示共同出现的负和正预测误差信号。与预期的刺激相比,意外的遗漏和意外的视觉刺激呈现会增加大脑的激活,这证明了这一点。我们的结果也强调了这些效应独立于刺激重复效应而发生。总之,这些发现支持认知的预测编码模型,强调了考虑期望违反的潜在双重性质的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cerebral cortex
Cerebral cortex 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.10%
发文量
510
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Cerebral Cortex publishes papers on the development, organization, plasticity, and function of the cerebral cortex, including the hippocampus. Studies with clear relevance to the cerebral cortex, such as the thalamocortical relationship or cortico-subcortical interactions, are also included. The journal is multidisciplinary and covers the large variety of modern neurobiological and neuropsychological techniques, including anatomy, biochemistry, molecular neurobiology, electrophysiology, behavior, artificial intelligence, and theoretical modeling. In addition to research articles, special features such as brief reviews, book reviews, and commentaries are included.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信