Gut microbiomes and treatment-resistant ulcerative colitis: a case-control study using qPCR.

IF 4 2区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Amjad Ahmadi, Leili Shokoohizadeh, Farshad Sheikhesmaili, Mohammadali Khan Mirzaei, Asadollah Mohammadi, Bahram Nikkhoo, Hakim Khodaei, Mohammad Yousef Alikhani, Rasoul Yousefimashouf
{"title":"Gut microbiomes and treatment-resistant ulcerative colitis: a case-control study using qPCR.","authors":"Amjad Ahmadi, Leili Shokoohizadeh, Farshad Sheikhesmaili, Mohammadali Khan Mirzaei, Asadollah Mohammadi, Bahram Nikkhoo, Hakim Khodaei, Mohammad Yousef Alikhani, Rasoul Yousefimashouf","doi":"10.1186/s12866-025-03963-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The gut microbiome has been identified as a pivotal factor in ulcerative colitis (UC), given its role as the main reservoir of microbes in the body. This community of microorganisms, present in variable concentrations in the digestive tract, makes a wide range of beneficial roles for the host. However, the role of the gut microbiome in patients with refractory UC is still significant, so this study aimed to further investigate the role of these bacteria in patients with refractory UC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This case-control study was conducted on stool samples from four distinct groups: the first group comprised new patients diagnosed with ulcerative colitis (all of them had responded to treatment after follow-up) (N = 24); the second group consisted of patients with treatment-resistant ulcerative colitis (N = 23); the third group included first-degree relatives of group 1 patients (N = 24); and the fourth group consisted of first-degree relatives of group 2 patients (N = 23). The research tools employed in this study included a questionnaire, quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) test, and culture on stool samples.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The mean age of patients in groups 1 and 2 was 45.88 ± 18.51 and 41.30 ± 13.01 years, while the mean age of controls in groups 3 and 4 was 37.29 ± 9.62 and 40.96 ± 13.01 years, respectively. Stool culture results for pathogenic bacteria were negative in all four groups. The of history of consuming dairy products containing probiotics was highest in Group 1, with 22 (91.67%) subjects, while the lowest was observed in Group 3, with 16 (66.67%). The highest history of self-administered antibiotic use was observed in Group 2, with 13 cases (56.52%), while the lowest was noted in Group 3, with 4 cases (16.67%). The findings indicated a statistically significant relationship (P < 0.05) between Groups 2 and 4 with respect to the E. coli and Bifidobacterium ssp. microbial population. Additionally, a significant relationship was identified between the Lactobacillus ssp., Bifidobacterium ssp., and Bacteroides ssp. microbial community between groups 1 and 2 (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of this study demonstrated that several intestinal microbiomes have a substantial impact on the management of ulcerative colitis. The results of this study suggest that by comparing the gut microbiome of treatment-resistant and individuals newly diagnosed with ulcerative colitis, we can gain a better understanding of microbiome differences that may influence treatment outcomes. The results of this study may also lead to the identification of new therapeutic strategies that are based on regulating the gut microbiome. These strategies could include the use of fecal microbiome transplantation (FMT), probiotics, prebiotics, or specific bacteria-based therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":9233,"journal":{"name":"BMC Microbiology","volume":"25 1","pages":"254"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12036124/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-025-03963-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The gut microbiome has been identified as a pivotal factor in ulcerative colitis (UC), given its role as the main reservoir of microbes in the body. This community of microorganisms, present in variable concentrations in the digestive tract, makes a wide range of beneficial roles for the host. However, the role of the gut microbiome in patients with refractory UC is still significant, so this study aimed to further investigate the role of these bacteria in patients with refractory UC.

Methods: This case-control study was conducted on stool samples from four distinct groups: the first group comprised new patients diagnosed with ulcerative colitis (all of them had responded to treatment after follow-up) (N = 24); the second group consisted of patients with treatment-resistant ulcerative colitis (N = 23); the third group included first-degree relatives of group 1 patients (N = 24); and the fourth group consisted of first-degree relatives of group 2 patients (N = 23). The research tools employed in this study included a questionnaire, quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) test, and culture on stool samples.

Result: The mean age of patients in groups 1 and 2 was 45.88 ± 18.51 and 41.30 ± 13.01 years, while the mean age of controls in groups 3 and 4 was 37.29 ± 9.62 and 40.96 ± 13.01 years, respectively. Stool culture results for pathogenic bacteria were negative in all four groups. The of history of consuming dairy products containing probiotics was highest in Group 1, with 22 (91.67%) subjects, while the lowest was observed in Group 3, with 16 (66.67%). The highest history of self-administered antibiotic use was observed in Group 2, with 13 cases (56.52%), while the lowest was noted in Group 3, with 4 cases (16.67%). The findings indicated a statistically significant relationship (P < 0.05) between Groups 2 and 4 with respect to the E. coli and Bifidobacterium ssp. microbial population. Additionally, a significant relationship was identified between the Lactobacillus ssp., Bifidobacterium ssp., and Bacteroides ssp. microbial community between groups 1 and 2 (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: The findings of this study demonstrated that several intestinal microbiomes have a substantial impact on the management of ulcerative colitis. The results of this study suggest that by comparing the gut microbiome of treatment-resistant and individuals newly diagnosed with ulcerative colitis, we can gain a better understanding of microbiome differences that may influence treatment outcomes. The results of this study may also lead to the identification of new therapeutic strategies that are based on regulating the gut microbiome. These strategies could include the use of fecal microbiome transplantation (FMT), probiotics, prebiotics, or specific bacteria-based therapies.

肠道微生物组和治疗抵抗性溃疡性结肠炎:使用qPCR的病例对照研究
背景:肠道微生物群已被确定为溃疡性结肠炎(UC)的关键因素,因为它是体内微生物的主要储存库。这个微生物群落以不同的浓度存在于消化道中,对宿主有广泛的有益作用。然而,肠道微生物组在难治性UC患者中的作用仍然很重要,因此本研究旨在进一步探讨这些细菌在难治性UC患者中的作用。方法:本病例对照研究对四组不同的粪便样本进行了研究:第一组包括新诊断为溃疡性结肠炎的患者(随访后所有患者均对治疗有反应)(N = 24);第二组为难治性溃疡性结肠炎患者(N = 23);第三组为组1患者的一级亲属(N = 24);第四组为组2患者的一级亲属(N = 23)。本研究采用的研究工具包括问卷调查、实时荧光定量PCR (qPCR)检测和粪便培养。结果:1、2组患者的平均年龄分别为45.88±18.51岁和41.30±13.01岁,3、4组患者的平均年龄分别为37.29±9.62岁和40.96±13.01岁。四组粪便病原菌培养结果均为阴性。1组食用含益生菌乳制品的比例最高,为22人(91.67%),3组最低,为16人(66.67%)。用药史最高的是组2,有13例(56.52%),最低的是组3,有4例(16.67%)。结论:本研究结果表明,几种肠道微生物组对溃疡性结肠炎的治疗有重大影响。本研究的结果表明,通过比较治疗耐药和新诊断为溃疡性结肠炎的个体的肠道微生物组,我们可以更好地了解可能影响治疗结果的微生物组差异。这项研究的结果也可能导致基于调节肠道微生物组的新治疗策略的确定。这些策略可能包括使用粪便微生物组移植(FMT)、益生菌、益生元或特定的基于细菌的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Microbiology
BMC Microbiology 生物-微生物学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
280
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: BMC Microbiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on analytical and functional studies of prokaryotic and eukaryotic microorganisms, viruses and small parasites, as well as host and therapeutic responses to them and their interaction with the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信