Sex differences in the work of breathing during exercise are independent of forced vital capacity in healthy adults.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 PHYSIOLOGY
Gracie O Grift, Jack R Dunsford, Jasvir K Dhaliwal, Paolo B Dominelli, Yannick Molgat-Seon
{"title":"Sex differences in the work of breathing during exercise are independent of forced vital capacity in healthy adults.","authors":"Gracie O Grift, Jack R Dunsford, Jasvir K Dhaliwal, Paolo B Dominelli, Yannick Molgat-Seon","doi":"10.1113/EP092586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>During exercise, females have a higher work of breathing (Ẇ<sub>B</sub>) than males for a given minute ventilation ( <math> <semantics> <msub><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>̇</mo></mover> <mi>E</mi></msub> <annotation>$ \\dot {V}_{\\text {E}}$</annotation></semantics> </math> ) ≥ 50-60 L min<sup>-1</sup>, presumably due to sex differences in airway size. However, on average, males have greater forced vital capacity (FVC) than females, and the confounding effect of FVC on sex differences in Ẇ<sub>B</sub> is unknown. To determine the effects of FVC and sex on Ẇ<sub>B</sub> during exercise in healthy adults, 30 healthy adults (15 males, 15 females) completed spirometry and an incremental cycle exercise test to exhaustion. Throughout exercise, Ẇ<sub>B</sub> was calculated based on oesophageal pressure and open-circuit spirometry. The Ẇ<sub>B</sub>- <math> <semantics> <msub><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>̇</mo></mover> <mi>E</mi></msub> <annotation>$ \\dot {V}_{\\text {E}}$</annotation></semantics> </math> relationship was compared between the sexes across all participants and in seven males and seven females matched for FVC and age. Across all participants, FVC had no effect on the Ẇ<sub>B</sub>- <math> <semantics> <msub><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>̇</mo></mover> <mi>E</mi></msub> <annotation>$ \\dot {V}_{\\text {E}}$</annotation></semantics> </math> relationship (P = 0.323), and females had a higher Ẇ<sub>B</sub> than males at a <math> <semantics> <msub><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>̇</mo></mover> <mi>E</mi></msub> <annotation>$ \\dot {V}_{\\text {E}}$</annotation></semantics> </math> of 50 (P = 0.030), 60 (P = 0.023), 70 (P = 0.021) and 80 L min<sup>-1</sup> (P = 0.020). At a <math> <semantics> <msub><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>̇</mo></mover> <mi>E</mi></msub> <annotation>$ \\dot {V}_{\\text {E}}$</annotation></semantics> </math> of 35 ± 2 L min<sup>-1</sup>, FVC was not associated with Ẇ<sub>B</sub> (r<sup>2 </sup>= 0.042, P = 0.278). Conversely, at a <math> <semantics> <msub><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>̇</mo></mover> <mi>E</mi></msub> <annotation>$ \\dot {V}_{\\text {E}}$</annotation></semantics> </math> of 70 ± 5 L min<sup>-1</sup>, FVC was associated with Ẇ<sub>B</sub> across all participants (r<sup>2 </sup>= 0.164, P = 0.026), but not within each sex (males: r<sup>2 </sup>= 0.077, P = 0.317; females: r<sup>2 </sup>= 0.011, P = 0.714). In the males and females matched for FVC and age, females had a higher Ẇ<sub>B</sub> than males at a <math> <semantics> <msub><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>̇</mo></mover> <mi>E</mi></msub> <annotation>$ \\dot {V}_{\\text {E}}$</annotation></semantics> </math> of 60 (P = 0.049), 70 (P = 0.019), 80 (P = 0.020) and 90 L min<sup>-1</sup> (P = 0.014). Overall, our findings indicate that sex differences in Ẇ<sub>B</sub> during exercise are not influenced by male-female differences in FVC.</p>","PeriodicalId":12092,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Physiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1113/EP092586","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During exercise, females have a higher work of breathing (ẆB) than males for a given minute ventilation ( V ̇ E $ \dot {V}_{\text {E}}$ ) ≥ 50-60 L min-1, presumably due to sex differences in airway size. However, on average, males have greater forced vital capacity (FVC) than females, and the confounding effect of FVC on sex differences in ẆB is unknown. To determine the effects of FVC and sex on ẆB during exercise in healthy adults, 30 healthy adults (15 males, 15 females) completed spirometry and an incremental cycle exercise test to exhaustion. Throughout exercise, ẆB was calculated based on oesophageal pressure and open-circuit spirometry. The ẆB- V ̇ E $ \dot {V}_{\text {E}}$ relationship was compared between the sexes across all participants and in seven males and seven females matched for FVC and age. Across all participants, FVC had no effect on the ẆB- V ̇ E $ \dot {V}_{\text {E}}$ relationship (P = 0.323), and females had a higher ẆB than males at a V ̇ E $ \dot {V}_{\text {E}}$ of 50 (P = 0.030), 60 (P = 0.023), 70 (P = 0.021) and 80 L min-1 (P = 0.020). At a V ̇ E $ \dot {V}_{\text {E}}$ of 35 ± 2 L min-1, FVC was not associated with ẆB (r= 0.042, P = 0.278). Conversely, at a V ̇ E $ \dot {V}_{\text {E}}$ of 70 ± 5 L min-1, FVC was associated with ẆB across all participants (r= 0.164, P = 0.026), but not within each sex (males: r= 0.077, P = 0.317; females: r= 0.011, P = 0.714). In the males and females matched for FVC and age, females had a higher ẆB than males at a V ̇ E $ \dot {V}_{\text {E}}$ of 60 (P = 0.049), 70 (P = 0.019), 80 (P = 0.020) and 90 L min-1 (P = 0.014). Overall, our findings indicate that sex differences in ẆB during exercise are not influenced by male-female differences in FVC.

健康成人在运动中呼吸功的性别差异与强迫肺活量无关。
在运动过程中,在给定的一分钟通气条件下,女性的呼吸功(ẆB)高于男性(V * E $ \dot {V}_{\text {E}}$)≥50-60 L min-1,可能是由于气道大小的性别差异。然而,平均而言,男性的强迫肺活量(FVC)高于女性,而FVC对ẆB性别差异的混淆作用尚不清楚。为了确定运动期间FVC和性别对健康成年人ẆB的影响,30名健康成年人(15名男性,15名女性)完成了肺活量测定和增量循环运动试验。在整个运动过程中,根据食管压力和开路肺活量计计算ẆB。研究人员比较了所有参与者的ẆB- V * E $ \dot {V}_{\text {E}}$关系,并对FVC和年龄相匹配的7名男性和7名女性进行了比较。在所有参与者中,FVC对ẆB- V * E $ \dot {V}_{\text {E}}$的关系没有影响(P = 0.323),在V * E $ \dot {V}_{\text {E}}$为50 (P = 0.030)、60 (P = 0.023)、70 (P = 0.021)和80 L min-1 (P = 0.020)时,女性的ẆB高于男性。在V * E $ \dot {V}_{\text {E}}$ 35±2 L min-1时,FVC与ẆB无相关性(r2 = 0.042, P = 0.278)。相反,当V * E $ \dot {V}_{\text {E}}$ = 70±5 L min-1时,FVC在所有参与者中与ẆB相关(r2 = 0.164, P = 0.026),但在每个性别中不相关(男性:r2 = 0.077, P = 0.317;女性:r2 = 0.011, P = 0.714)。在FVC和年龄匹配的男女中,女性的ẆB高于男性,分别为60 (P = 0.049)、70 (P = 0.019)、80 (P = 0.020)和90 L min-1 (P = 0.014)。总的来说,我们的研究结果表明,运动过程中ẆB的性别差异不受男女FVC差异的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Experimental Physiology
Experimental Physiology 医学-生理学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.70%
发文量
262
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Experimental Physiology publishes research papers that report novel insights into homeostatic and adaptive responses in health, as well as those that further our understanding of pathophysiological mechanisms in disease. We encourage papers that embrace the journal’s orientation of translation and integration, including studies of the adaptive responses to exercise, acute and chronic environmental stressors, growth and aging, and diseases where integrative homeostatic mechanisms play a key role in the response to and evolution of the disease process. Examples of such diseases include hypertension, heart failure, hypoxic lung disease, endocrine and neurological disorders. We are also keen to publish research that has a translational aspect or clinical application. Comparative physiology work that can be applied to aid the understanding human physiology is also encouraged. Manuscripts that report the use of bioinformatic, genomic, molecular, proteomic and cellular techniques to provide novel insights into integrative physiological and pathophysiological mechanisms are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信