Gracie O Grift, Jack R Dunsford, Jasvir K Dhaliwal, Paolo B Dominelli, Yannick Molgat-Seon
{"title":"Sex differences in the work of breathing during exercise are independent of forced vital capacity in healthy adults.","authors":"Gracie O Grift, Jack R Dunsford, Jasvir K Dhaliwal, Paolo B Dominelli, Yannick Molgat-Seon","doi":"10.1113/EP092586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>During exercise, females have a higher work of breathing (Ẇ<sub>B</sub>) than males for a given minute ventilation ( <math> <semantics> <msub><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>̇</mo></mover> <mi>E</mi></msub> <annotation>$ \\dot {V}_{\\text {E}}$</annotation></semantics> </math> ) ≥ 50-60 L min<sup>-1</sup>, presumably due to sex differences in airway size. However, on average, males have greater forced vital capacity (FVC) than females, and the confounding effect of FVC on sex differences in Ẇ<sub>B</sub> is unknown. To determine the effects of FVC and sex on Ẇ<sub>B</sub> during exercise in healthy adults, 30 healthy adults (15 males, 15 females) completed spirometry and an incremental cycle exercise test to exhaustion. Throughout exercise, Ẇ<sub>B</sub> was calculated based on oesophageal pressure and open-circuit spirometry. The Ẇ<sub>B</sub>- <math> <semantics> <msub><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>̇</mo></mover> <mi>E</mi></msub> <annotation>$ \\dot {V}_{\\text {E}}$</annotation></semantics> </math> relationship was compared between the sexes across all participants and in seven males and seven females matched for FVC and age. Across all participants, FVC had no effect on the Ẇ<sub>B</sub>- <math> <semantics> <msub><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>̇</mo></mover> <mi>E</mi></msub> <annotation>$ \\dot {V}_{\\text {E}}$</annotation></semantics> </math> relationship (P = 0.323), and females had a higher Ẇ<sub>B</sub> than males at a <math> <semantics> <msub><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>̇</mo></mover> <mi>E</mi></msub> <annotation>$ \\dot {V}_{\\text {E}}$</annotation></semantics> </math> of 50 (P = 0.030), 60 (P = 0.023), 70 (P = 0.021) and 80 L min<sup>-1</sup> (P = 0.020). At a <math> <semantics> <msub><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>̇</mo></mover> <mi>E</mi></msub> <annotation>$ \\dot {V}_{\\text {E}}$</annotation></semantics> </math> of 35 ± 2 L min<sup>-1</sup>, FVC was not associated with Ẇ<sub>B</sub> (r<sup>2 </sup>= 0.042, P = 0.278). Conversely, at a <math> <semantics> <msub><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>̇</mo></mover> <mi>E</mi></msub> <annotation>$ \\dot {V}_{\\text {E}}$</annotation></semantics> </math> of 70 ± 5 L min<sup>-1</sup>, FVC was associated with Ẇ<sub>B</sub> across all participants (r<sup>2 </sup>= 0.164, P = 0.026), but not within each sex (males: r<sup>2 </sup>= 0.077, P = 0.317; females: r<sup>2 </sup>= 0.011, P = 0.714). In the males and females matched for FVC and age, females had a higher Ẇ<sub>B</sub> than males at a <math> <semantics> <msub><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>̇</mo></mover> <mi>E</mi></msub> <annotation>$ \\dot {V}_{\\text {E}}$</annotation></semantics> </math> of 60 (P = 0.049), 70 (P = 0.019), 80 (P = 0.020) and 90 L min<sup>-1</sup> (P = 0.014). Overall, our findings indicate that sex differences in Ẇ<sub>B</sub> during exercise are not influenced by male-female differences in FVC.</p>","PeriodicalId":12092,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Physiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1113/EP092586","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
During exercise, females have a higher work of breathing (ẆB) than males for a given minute ventilation ( ) ≥ 50-60 L min-1, presumably due to sex differences in airway size. However, on average, males have greater forced vital capacity (FVC) than females, and the confounding effect of FVC on sex differences in ẆB is unknown. To determine the effects of FVC and sex on ẆB during exercise in healthy adults, 30 healthy adults (15 males, 15 females) completed spirometry and an incremental cycle exercise test to exhaustion. Throughout exercise, ẆB was calculated based on oesophageal pressure and open-circuit spirometry. The ẆB- relationship was compared between the sexes across all participants and in seven males and seven females matched for FVC and age. Across all participants, FVC had no effect on the ẆB- relationship (P = 0.323), and females had a higher ẆB than males at a of 50 (P = 0.030), 60 (P = 0.023), 70 (P = 0.021) and 80 L min-1 (P = 0.020). At a of 35 ± 2 L min-1, FVC was not associated with ẆB (r2 = 0.042, P = 0.278). Conversely, at a of 70 ± 5 L min-1, FVC was associated with ẆB across all participants (r2 = 0.164, P = 0.026), but not within each sex (males: r2 = 0.077, P = 0.317; females: r2 = 0.011, P = 0.714). In the males and females matched for FVC and age, females had a higher ẆB than males at a of 60 (P = 0.049), 70 (P = 0.019), 80 (P = 0.020) and 90 L min-1 (P = 0.014). Overall, our findings indicate that sex differences in ẆB during exercise are not influenced by male-female differences in FVC.
期刊介绍:
Experimental Physiology publishes research papers that report novel insights into homeostatic and adaptive responses in health, as well as those that further our understanding of pathophysiological mechanisms in disease. We encourage papers that embrace the journal’s orientation of translation and integration, including studies of the adaptive responses to exercise, acute and chronic environmental stressors, growth and aging, and diseases where integrative homeostatic mechanisms play a key role in the response to and evolution of the disease process. Examples of such diseases include hypertension, heart failure, hypoxic lung disease, endocrine and neurological disorders. We are also keen to publish research that has a translational aspect or clinical application. Comparative physiology work that can be applied to aid the understanding human physiology is also encouraged.
Manuscripts that report the use of bioinformatic, genomic, molecular, proteomic and cellular techniques to provide novel insights into integrative physiological and pathophysiological mechanisms are welcomed.