Validation of the Zwolle Risk Score in STEMI Patients Undergoing Primary PCI: Insights from the ISCAS-STEMI COVID-19 Registry.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Giuseppe De Luca, Magdy Algowhary, Berat Uguz, Dinaldo C Oliveira, Vladimir Ganyukov, Zan Zimbakov, Miha Cercek, Lisette Okkels Jensen, Poay Huan Loh, Lucian Calmac, Gerard Roura I Ferrer, Alexandre Quadros, Marek Malewski, Fortunato Scotto Di Uccio, Clemens Von Birgelen, Francesco Versaci, Jurrien Ten Berg, Gianni Casella, Aaron Wong Sung Lung, Petr Kala, José Luis Díez Gil, Xavier Carillo, Maurits T Dirksen, Victor Manuel Becerra-Munoz, Michael Kang-Yin Lee, Dafsah Arifa Juzar, Rodrigo de Moura Joaquim, Roberto Paladino, Davor Miličić, Periklis Davlouros, Nikola Bakraceski, Filippo Zilio, Luca Donazzan, Adriaan Kraaijeveld, Gennaro Galasso, Lux Arpad, Lucia Marinucci, Vincenzo Guiducci, Maurizio Menichelli, Alessandra Scoccia, Aylin Hatice Yamac, Kadir Ugur Mert, Xacobe Flores Rios, Tomas Kovarnik, Michal Kidawa, Jose Moreu, Flavien Vincent, Enrico Fabris, Inigo Lozano Martínez-Luengas, Marco Boccalatte, Francisco Bosa Ojeda, Carlos Arellano-Serrano, Gianluca Caiazzo, Giuseppe Cirrincione, Hsien-Li Kao, Juan Sanchis Fores, Luigi Vignali, Hélder Pereira, Stephane Manzo-Silbermann, Santiago Ordonez, Alev Arat Ozkan, Bruno Scheller, Heidi Lehtola, Rui Teles, Christos Mantis, Ylitalo Antti, Joao Antonio Brum Silveira, Rodrigo Zoni, Ivan Bessonov, Stefano Savonitto, George Kochiadakis, Dimitrios Alexopulos, Carlos E Uribe, John Kanakakis, Benjamin Faurie, Gabriele Gabrielli, Alexandro Gutierrez Barrios, Jaun Pablo Bachini, Alex Rocha, Frankie Chor-Cheung Tam, Alfredo Rodriguez, Antonia Anna Lukito, Veauthyelau Saint Joy, Gustavo Pessah, Giuliana Cortese, Guido Parodi, Mohammed Abed Burgadha, Elvin Kedhi, Pablo Lamelas, Harry Suryapranata, Matteo Nardin, Monica Verdoia
{"title":"Validation of the Zwolle Risk Score in STEMI Patients Undergoing Primary PCI: Insights from the ISCAS-STEMI COVID-19 Registry.","authors":"Giuseppe De Luca, Magdy Algowhary, Berat Uguz, Dinaldo C Oliveira, Vladimir Ganyukov, Zan Zimbakov, Miha Cercek, Lisette Okkels Jensen, Poay Huan Loh, Lucian Calmac, Gerard Roura I Ferrer, Alexandre Quadros, Marek Malewski, Fortunato Scotto Di Uccio, Clemens Von Birgelen, Francesco Versaci, Jurrien Ten Berg, Gianni Casella, Aaron Wong Sung Lung, Petr Kala, José Luis Díez Gil, Xavier Carillo, Maurits T Dirksen, Victor Manuel Becerra-Munoz, Michael Kang-Yin Lee, Dafsah Arifa Juzar, Rodrigo de Moura Joaquim, Roberto Paladino, Davor Miličić, Periklis Davlouros, Nikola Bakraceski, Filippo Zilio, Luca Donazzan, Adriaan Kraaijeveld, Gennaro Galasso, Lux Arpad, Lucia Marinucci, Vincenzo Guiducci, Maurizio Menichelli, Alessandra Scoccia, Aylin Hatice Yamac, Kadir Ugur Mert, Xacobe Flores Rios, Tomas Kovarnik, Michal Kidawa, Jose Moreu, Flavien Vincent, Enrico Fabris, Inigo Lozano Martínez-Luengas, Marco Boccalatte, Francisco Bosa Ojeda, Carlos Arellano-Serrano, Gianluca Caiazzo, Giuseppe Cirrincione, Hsien-Li Kao, Juan Sanchis Fores, Luigi Vignali, Hélder Pereira, Stephane Manzo-Silbermann, Santiago Ordonez, Alev Arat Ozkan, Bruno Scheller, Heidi Lehtola, Rui Teles, Christos Mantis, Ylitalo Antti, Joao Antonio Brum Silveira, Rodrigo Zoni, Ivan Bessonov, Stefano Savonitto, George Kochiadakis, Dimitrios Alexopulos, Carlos E Uribe, John Kanakakis, Benjamin Faurie, Gabriele Gabrielli, Alexandro Gutierrez Barrios, Jaun Pablo Bachini, Alex Rocha, Frankie Chor-Cheung Tam, Alfredo Rodriguez, Antonia Anna Lukito, Veauthyelau Saint Joy, Gustavo Pessah, Giuliana Cortese, Guido Parodi, Mohammed Abed Burgadha, Elvin Kedhi, Pablo Lamelas, Harry Suryapranata, Matteo Nardin, Monica Verdoia","doi":"10.2174/0115701611335913250408214530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Several scores have been developed to facilitate risk stratification and early discharge following primary angioplasty, particularly the Zwolle Risk Score (ZRS). However, validation in large-sized studies is still lacking. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to validate the use of the ZRS in a contemporary global population, including patients who were treated during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and enrolled in a large intercontinental observational study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The ISACS-STEMI COVID-19 is a large-scale retrospective multicenter registry involving primary PCI centers from Europe, Latin America, South-East Asia, and NorthAfrica, including patients treated from March 1st until June 30th, in 2019 and 2020]. ZRS was calculated for each patient. The patients were additionally categorized according to the following values of the ZRS [≤3; 4-6; 7-9; ≥10]. Our study outcomes were in-hospital and 30-day mortality. The discriminatory capacity of the ZRS was assessed by the area under the ROC curve [c statistic] as an index of model performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our population is represented by 16084 STEMI patients undergoing mechanical reperfusion enrolled in 109 centers. The score showed a very good performance in the predicting mortality both in-hospital [AUC=0.83 [0.82-0.85], p<0.0001] and at 30- day follow-up [AUC=0.82 [0.81-0.84, p<0.0001]. The results were confirmed when the ZRS was separately applied to patients treated in 2019 and 2020, with good stability across time. ZRS was able to identify a large cohort [n=10672, 66.3%] of low-risk patients [score ≤3] with a very low mortality rate at 2 days [1%] and between 3 and 10 days [0.7%], with a very good negative predictive value for in-hospital [98.3%] and 30-day mortality [97.7%], with similar results in 2019 and 2020.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study is the first to demonstrate the good prognostic performance of the ZRS in a large-scale contemporary global multicenter validation set. Similar results were obtained both in the pre-pandemic and the COVID-19 era. ZRS ≤3 identified a very low-risk population that could be discharged early, even during the COVID-19 pandemic, with expected advantages in the availability of hospital beds and nursing staff, costs of medical care, and in-hospital risk of contagion.</p>","PeriodicalId":11278,"journal":{"name":"Current vascular pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current vascular pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115701611335913250408214530","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Several scores have been developed to facilitate risk stratification and early discharge following primary angioplasty, particularly the Zwolle Risk Score (ZRS). However, validation in large-sized studies is still lacking. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to validate the use of the ZRS in a contemporary global population, including patients who were treated during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and enrolled in a large intercontinental observational study.

Methods: The ISACS-STEMI COVID-19 is a large-scale retrospective multicenter registry involving primary PCI centers from Europe, Latin America, South-East Asia, and NorthAfrica, including patients treated from March 1st until June 30th, in 2019 and 2020]. ZRS was calculated for each patient. The patients were additionally categorized according to the following values of the ZRS [≤3; 4-6; 7-9; ≥10]. Our study outcomes were in-hospital and 30-day mortality. The discriminatory capacity of the ZRS was assessed by the area under the ROC curve [c statistic] as an index of model performance.

Results: Our population is represented by 16084 STEMI patients undergoing mechanical reperfusion enrolled in 109 centers. The score showed a very good performance in the predicting mortality both in-hospital [AUC=0.83 [0.82-0.85], p<0.0001] and at 30- day follow-up [AUC=0.82 [0.81-0.84, p<0.0001]. The results were confirmed when the ZRS was separately applied to patients treated in 2019 and 2020, with good stability across time. ZRS was able to identify a large cohort [n=10672, 66.3%] of low-risk patients [score ≤3] with a very low mortality rate at 2 days [1%] and between 3 and 10 days [0.7%], with a very good negative predictive value for in-hospital [98.3%] and 30-day mortality [97.7%], with similar results in 2019 and 2020.

Conclusion: This study is the first to demonstrate the good prognostic performance of the ZRS in a large-scale contemporary global multicenter validation set. Similar results were obtained both in the pre-pandemic and the COVID-19 era. ZRS ≤3 identified a very low-risk population that could be discharged early, even during the COVID-19 pandemic, with expected advantages in the availability of hospital beds and nursing staff, costs of medical care, and in-hospital risk of contagion.

接受初级PCI治疗的STEMI患者Zwolle风险评分的验证:来自ISCAS-STEMI COVID-19注册表的见解
背景:在初次血管成形术后,已经开发了几个评分来促进风险分层和早期出院,特别是Zwolle风险评分(ZRS)。然而,大规模研究的验证仍然缺乏。因此,本研究的目的是验证ZRS在当代全球人群中的使用,包括在SARS-CoV-2大流行期间接受治疗的患者,并参加了一项大型洲际观察性研究。ISACS-STEMI COVID-19是一项大型回顾性多中心注册研究,涉及来自欧洲、拉丁美洲、东南亚和北非的主要PCI中心,包括2019年3月1日至6月30日在2019年和2020年治疗的患者。计算每位患者的ZRS。根据ZRS值[≤3;4 - 6;7 - 9;≥10]。我们的研究结果是住院死亡率和30天死亡率。以ROC曲线下面积[c statistic]作为模型性能的指标来评价ZRS的判别能力。结果:我们的人群由109个中心的16084名接受机械再灌注的STEMI患者代表。该评分在预测院内死亡率方面表现非常好[AUC=0.83[0.82-0.85]]。结论:本研究首次在大规模的当代全球多中心验证集中证明了ZRS的良好预后性能。在大流行前和COVID-19时代都获得了类似的结果。ZRS≤3确定了极低风险人群,即使在COVID-19大流行期间也可以提前出院,在医院床位和护理人员的可用性、医疗费用和院内传染风险方面具有预期优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current vascular pharmacology
Current vascular pharmacology 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
4.40%
发文量
54
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Vascular Pharmacology publishes clinical and research-based reviews/mini-reviews, original research articles, letters, debates, drug clinical trial studies and guest edited issues to update all those concerned with the treatment of vascular disease, bridging the gap between clinical practice and ongoing research. Vascular disease is the commonest cause of death in Westernized countries and its incidence is on the increase in developing countries. It follows that considerable research is directed at establishing effective treatment for acute vascular events. Long-term treatment has also received considerable attention (e.g. for symptomatic relief). Furthermore, effective prevention, whether primary or secondary, is backed by the findings of several landmark trials. Vascular disease is a complex field with primary care physicians and nurse practitioners as well as several specialties involved. The latter include cardiology, vascular and cardio thoracic surgery, general medicine, radiology, clinical pharmacology and neurology (stroke units).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信