Reproducibility of Lung Density Quantification across Photon-counting and Conventional Energy-integrating CT: A Comparative Study.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Saman Sotoudeh-Paima, Ehsan Samei, And Ehsan Abadi
{"title":"Reproducibility of Lung Density Quantification across Photon-counting and Conventional Energy-integrating CT: A Comparative Study.","authors":"Saman Sotoudeh-Paima, Ehsan Samei, And Ehsan Abadi","doi":"10.1093/bjr/tqaf103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate how photon-counting CT (PCCT) reproducibly quantifies lung density compared to conventional CT (energy-integrating CT or EICT) and assess the relevance of image quality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective analysis of a prospective study, subjects underwent acquisitions using EICT and PCCT systems (August-December 2021) on the same day. PCCT projections were reconstructed with four kernels and two voxel sizes using 2024 reconstruction software (ReconCT, Siemens). PCCT and EICT data were compared using lung density measurements: percentage of low-attenuation areas <-950 HU (LAA-950), 15th percentile of lung density histogram (Perc15), and mean lung density (MLD). Measurement reproducibility and its relation to image quality parameters (modulation transfer function and noise) were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-four subjects (mean age, 67.4 years ± 9.6, 30 female) were studied. PCCT images had the closest agreement to EICT under identical voxel size and similar kernels, yielding lower LAA-950 (-0.9%±2.7, p < 0.05), higher Perc15 (1.4HU ± 7.9, p > 0.05), and higher MLD (2.4 HU ± 10.8, p > 0.05). At higher PCCT resolution (1024 × 1024 matrix, 0.2 mm slice thickness), the smoother quantitative kernel (Qr36) improved agreement, with differences of -0.5%±3.0, -0.1HU ± 9.8, and 2.8HU ± 11.1, for LAA-950, Perc15, and MLD (p > 0.05). Image quality parameters strongly correlated with density measurements (RPerc152=85.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PCCT yields reproducible lung density measurements comparable to EICT, with optimal reproducibility dependent on optimized reconstruction parameters and explainable by image quality parameters.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>Lung density reproducibility is critical for integrating PCCT into EICT-based workflows. In our study, PCCT aligned more closely with EICT using similar kernels at identical voxel sizes, or smoother kernels at smaller voxel sizes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9306,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqaf103","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate how photon-counting CT (PCCT) reproducibly quantifies lung density compared to conventional CT (energy-integrating CT or EICT) and assess the relevance of image quality.

Methods: In this retrospective analysis of a prospective study, subjects underwent acquisitions using EICT and PCCT systems (August-December 2021) on the same day. PCCT projections were reconstructed with four kernels and two voxel sizes using 2024 reconstruction software (ReconCT, Siemens). PCCT and EICT data were compared using lung density measurements: percentage of low-attenuation areas <-950 HU (LAA-950), 15th percentile of lung density histogram (Perc15), and mean lung density (MLD). Measurement reproducibility and its relation to image quality parameters (modulation transfer function and noise) were analyzed.

Results: Fifty-four subjects (mean age, 67.4 years ± 9.6, 30 female) were studied. PCCT images had the closest agreement to EICT under identical voxel size and similar kernels, yielding lower LAA-950 (-0.9%±2.7, p < 0.05), higher Perc15 (1.4HU ± 7.9, p > 0.05), and higher MLD (2.4 HU ± 10.8, p > 0.05). At higher PCCT resolution (1024 × 1024 matrix, 0.2 mm slice thickness), the smoother quantitative kernel (Qr36) improved agreement, with differences of -0.5%±3.0, -0.1HU ± 9.8, and 2.8HU ± 11.1, for LAA-950, Perc15, and MLD (p > 0.05). Image quality parameters strongly correlated with density measurements (RPerc152=85.3%).

Conclusions: PCCT yields reproducible lung density measurements comparable to EICT, with optimal reproducibility dependent on optimized reconstruction parameters and explainable by image quality parameters.

Advances in knowledge: Lung density reproducibility is critical for integrating PCCT into EICT-based workflows. In our study, PCCT aligned more closely with EICT using similar kernels at identical voxel sizes, or smoother kernels at smaller voxel sizes.

光子计数和常规能量积分CT肺密度定量再现性的比较研究。
目的:评估光子计数CT (PCCT)与传统CT(能量积分CT或EICT)相比如何可重复性地量化肺密度,并评估图像质量的相关性。方法:在这项前瞻性研究的回顾性分析中,受试者在同一天使用EICT和PCCT系统(2021年8月至12月)进行获取。使用2024重建软件(Siemens的ReconCT)对PCCT投影进行4个核和2个体素大小的重建。使用肺密度测量比较PCCT和EICT数据:低衰减区百分比结果:研究了54例受试者(平均年龄67.4岁±9.6岁,女性30例)。在相同体素大小和相似核的情况下,PCCT图像与EICT最接近,LAA-950较低(-0.9%±2.7,p 0.05), MLD较高(2.4 HU±10.8,p > 0.05)。在更高的PCCT分辨率下(1024 × 1024矩阵,0.2 mm切片厚度),更平滑的定量核(Qr36)提高了一致性,LAA-950、Perc15和MLD的差异分别为-0.5%±3.0、-0.1HU±9.8和2.8HU±11.1 (p > 0.05)。图像质量参数与密度测量值密切相关(RPerc152=85.3%)。结论:PCCT可获得与EICT相当的可重复性肺密度测量,其最佳重复性取决于优化的重建参数,并可通过图像质量参数解释。知识进步:肺密度可重复性对于将PCCT整合到基于eict的工作流程至关重要。在我们的研究中,PCCT与EICT更接近,使用相同体素大小的相似核,或较小体素大小的更平滑核。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Radiology
British Journal of Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
330
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: BJR is the international research journal of the British Institute of Radiology and is the oldest scientific journal in the field of radiology and related sciences. Dating back to 1896, BJR’s history is radiology’s history, and the journal has featured some landmark papers such as the first description of Computed Tomography "Computerized transverse axial tomography" by Godfrey Hounsfield in 1973. A valuable historical resource, the complete BJR archive has been digitized from 1896. Quick Facts: - 2015 Impact Factor – 1.840 - Receipt to first decision – average of 6 weeks - Acceptance to online publication – average of 3 weeks - ISSN: 0007-1285 - eISSN: 1748-880X Open Access option
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信