Prevalence and recovery rate of persistent olfactory dysfunction in COVID-19: the COVORTS study.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Rhinology Pub Date : 2025-04-21 DOI:10.4193/Rhin24.331
B van Dijk, E M Postma, W M Boek, D M A Kamalski, S Boesveldt
{"title":"Prevalence and recovery rate of persistent olfactory dysfunction in COVID-19: the COVORTS study.","authors":"B van Dijk, E M Postma, W M Boek, D M A Kamalski, S Boesveldt","doi":"10.4193/Rhin24.331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Olfactory dysfunction is a well-recognized symptom of COVID-19 infection. However, prevalence and recovery rate of these persistent symptoms differ across reports. Here, we report prevalence and recovery rate of psychophysically measured quantitative olfactory dysfunction, qualitative complaints, and subjective olfactory functioning up to 15 months after infection.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>The COVORTS cohort included 76 patients between 18-60 years with recent (1 month) olfactory dysfunction. The (extended) Sniffin' Sticks test was performed at baseline (T1), and 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months later (T13). Monthly online questionnaires were completed on self-reported overall olfactory functioning and qualitative complaints.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Prevalence of quantitative olfactory dysfunction was 89.5% at baseline, and 69.1% at T13. Clinically relevant recovery was achieved by 29.4% of patients at T13. Prevalence of parosmia remained around 50%, while phantosmia slowly decreased from 43.4% to 23.5%. Subjective olfactory functioning slowly improved over time before levelling out at around half of pre-illness ability. At T13, 37.9% of patients reported an improvement of at least 80% of pre-COVID function. Fluctuations were observed within individuals for all three measurements.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Irrespective of measurement method, prevalence of olfactory dysfunction remains high up to 15 months after infection, and recovery rate is low. Individual fluctuations were observed between timepoints, indicating that recovery is not stable. Acknowledgement of symptoms, knowledge of fluctuations, and longer follow-up to evaluate further recovery are crucial to improve patient management.</p>","PeriodicalId":21361,"journal":{"name":"Rhinology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rhinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4193/Rhin24.331","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Olfactory dysfunction is a well-recognized symptom of COVID-19 infection. However, prevalence and recovery rate of these persistent symptoms differ across reports. Here, we report prevalence and recovery rate of psychophysically measured quantitative olfactory dysfunction, qualitative complaints, and subjective olfactory functioning up to 15 months after infection.

Methodology: The COVORTS cohort included 76 patients between 18-60 years with recent (1 month) olfactory dysfunction. The (extended) Sniffin' Sticks test was performed at baseline (T1), and 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months later (T13). Monthly online questionnaires were completed on self-reported overall olfactory functioning and qualitative complaints.

Results: Prevalence of quantitative olfactory dysfunction was 89.5% at baseline, and 69.1% at T13. Clinically relevant recovery was achieved by 29.4% of patients at T13. Prevalence of parosmia remained around 50%, while phantosmia slowly decreased from 43.4% to 23.5%. Subjective olfactory functioning slowly improved over time before levelling out at around half of pre-illness ability. At T13, 37.9% of patients reported an improvement of at least 80% of pre-COVID function. Fluctuations were observed within individuals for all three measurements.

Conclusions: Irrespective of measurement method, prevalence of olfactory dysfunction remains high up to 15 months after infection, and recovery rate is low. Individual fluctuations were observed between timepoints, indicating that recovery is not stable. Acknowledgement of symptoms, knowledge of fluctuations, and longer follow-up to evaluate further recovery are crucial to improve patient management.

COVID-19患者持续性嗅觉功能障碍的患病率和恢复率:COVORTS研究
背景:嗅觉功能障碍是COVID-19感染的常见症状。然而,这些持续性症状的患病率和恢复率在不同的报告中有所不同。在这里,我们报告了心理物理测量的定量嗅觉功能障碍、定性抱怨和主观嗅觉功能在感染后15个月的患病率和恢复率。方法:COVORTS队列包括76例18-60岁近期(1个月)嗅觉功能障碍的患者。在基线(T1)、3个月、6个月、9个月和12个月后(T13)进行(延长的)嗅探棒试验。每个月都要完成关于自我报告的整体嗅觉功能和定性投诉的在线问卷。结果:定量嗅觉功能障碍的患病率在基线时为89.5%,在T13时为69.1%。T13期患者临床相关恢复率为29.4%。畸形的患病率保持在50%左右,而幻型则从43.4%缓慢下降到23.5%。主观嗅觉功能随着时间的推移慢慢改善,直到达到病前能力的一半左右。在T13时,37.9%的患者报告covid前功能至少改善了80%。在所有三种测量中都观察到个体的波动。结论:无论采用何种测量方法,感染后15个月嗅觉功能障碍的患病率仍然很高,恢复率很低。在时间点之间观察到个别波动,表明恢复并不稳定。对症状的认识、对波动的认识以及对进一步恢复情况的长期随访对改善患者管理至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rhinology
Rhinology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
15.80
自引率
9.70%
发文量
135
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Rhinology serves as the official Journal of the International Rhinologic Society and is recognized as one of the journals of the European Rhinologic Society. It offers a prominent platform for disseminating rhinologic research, reviews, position papers, task force reports, and guidelines to an international scientific audience. The journal also boasts the prestigious European Position Paper in Rhinosinusitis (EPOS), a highly influential publication first released in 2005 and subsequently updated in 2007, 2012, and most recently in 2020. Employing a double-blind peer review system, Rhinology welcomes original articles, review articles, and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信