Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization in the Treatment of Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Shitai Ye, Sixi Zhang, Tianfang Li, Shuchao Wang, Xin Wang, Yong Deng, Longyang Yu, Qi Li, Xinggang Feng, Bingwu Jiang, Zhao Dai, Qifeng Guo, Qin Han, Wei Jin, Shujing Weng, Shunfu Jiang, Zhongming Qiu, Mohamad Abdalkader, Thanh N Nguyen
{"title":"Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization in the Treatment of Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Shitai Ye, Sixi Zhang, Tianfang Li, Shuchao Wang, Xin Wang, Yong Deng, Longyang Yu, Qi Li, Xinggang Feng, Bingwu Jiang, Zhao Dai, Qifeng Guo, Qin Han, Wei Jin, Shujing Weng, Shunfu Jiang, Zhongming Qiu, Mohamad Abdalkader, Thanh N Nguyen","doi":"10.1159/000546001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There is increasing evidence that middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) can be used to treat chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH). The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of MMAE treatment through a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases to obtain articles related to MMAE from inception to December 3, 2024. The effectiveness outcomes were recurrence, progression, or reoperation of subdural hematoma after treatment, 90-day mRS 0-2, and 90-day mRS 0-3. The safety outcomes were severe deterioration of neurologic function and death within 180 days. The quality of the RCTs was evaluated with the Cochrane risk assessment tool, while the cohort studies were evaluated by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). The random-effect model was used to calculate the effect as risk ratio (RR). The heterogeneity of the results of each study was analyzed by χ2 test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 892 articles are retrieved. Among those, 4 RCTs and 5 cohort studies met the inclusion criteria. The RCT analysis showed that MMAE plus traditional treatment reduced the risk of recurrence or progression of hematoma compared with traditional treatment alone (5.3% vs. 9.1%; RR: 0.58, 95% CI, 0.39-0.86, p = 0.03). The heterogeneity was very low (I2 = 22%). There was no significant difference between the two groups for the 90-day mRS 0-2 and 0-3 scores (p = 0.73/p = 0.71, respectively). In terms of safety outcomes, the 180-day mortality was 3.5% in the MMAE plus traditional treatment group and 5.0% in the traditional treatment group (p = 0.49 > 0.05). Neurological deterioration was present in 4.6% of patients with MMAE plus traditional treatment compared to 3.9% with traditional treatment (p = 0.44 > 0.05). Across the 5 cohort studies, similar results were obtained for the incidence of recurrence, progression or reoperation of subdural hematoma (12.9% vs. 40.6%; RR: 0.26, 95% CI, 0.07-0.95, p = 0.04), but the heterogeneity was very high (I2 = 89%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis showed that in cSDH patients, MMAE was associated with a reduced rate of recurrence, progression or reoperation of the subdural hematoma compared to traditional treatment with surgery without increasing the incidence of death or adverse events.</p>","PeriodicalId":9683,"journal":{"name":"Cerebrovascular Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cerebrovascular Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000546001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: There is increasing evidence that middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) can be used to treat chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH). The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of MMAE treatment through a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Methods: We searched the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases to obtain articles related to MMAE from inception to December 3, 2024. The effectiveness outcomes were recurrence, progression, or reoperation of subdural hematoma after treatment, 90-day mRS 0-2, and 90-day mRS 0-3. The safety outcomes were severe deterioration of neurologic function and death within 180 days. The quality of the RCTs was evaluated with the Cochrane risk assessment tool, while the cohort studies were evaluated by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). The random-effect model was used to calculate the effect as risk ratio (RR). The heterogeneity of the results of each study was analyzed by χ2 test.

Results: A total of 892 articles are retrieved. Among those, 4 RCTs and 5 cohort studies met the inclusion criteria. The RCT analysis showed that MMAE plus traditional treatment reduced the risk of recurrence or progression of hematoma compared with traditional treatment alone (5.3% vs. 9.1%; RR: 0.58, 95% CI, 0.39-0.86, p = 0.03). The heterogeneity was very low (I2 = 22%). There was no significant difference between the two groups for the 90-day mRS 0-2 and 0-3 scores (p = 0.73/p = 0.71, respectively). In terms of safety outcomes, the 180-day mortality was 3.5% in the MMAE plus traditional treatment group and 5.0% in the traditional treatment group (p = 0.49 > 0.05). Neurological deterioration was present in 4.6% of patients with MMAE plus traditional treatment compared to 3.9% with traditional treatment (p = 0.44 > 0.05). Across the 5 cohort studies, similar results were obtained for the incidence of recurrence, progression or reoperation of subdural hematoma (12.9% vs. 40.6%; RR: 0.26, 95% CI, 0.07-0.95, p = 0.04), but the heterogeneity was very high (I2 = 89%).

Conclusion: This systematic review and meta-analysis showed that in cSDH patients, MMAE was associated with a reduced rate of recurrence, progression or reoperation of the subdural hematoma compared to traditional treatment with surgery without increasing the incidence of death or adverse events.

脑膜中动脉栓塞治疗慢性硬膜下血肿:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景与目的:越来越多的证据表明,脑膜中动脉栓塞术(MMAE)可用于治疗慢性硬膜下血肿。本研究的目的是通过观察性研究和随机对照试验(rct)的系统回顾和荟萃分析来证明MMAE治疗的有效性和安全性。方法:检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library和Web of Science数据库,获取MMAE成立至2024年12月3日的相关文献。疗效观察为治疗后硬膜下血肿复发、进展或再手术;90天mRS 0-2;90天mRS 0-3。安全性结局为神经功能严重恶化和180天内死亡。随机对照试验的质量采用Cochrane风险评估工具进行评估,队列研究采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)进行评估。采用随机效应模型计算风险比(RR)效应。采用χ2检验分析各研究结果的异质性。结果:共检索到892篇文献。其中4项rct和5项队列研究符合纳入标准。RCT分析显示,与单独使用传统治疗相比,MMAE加传统治疗可降低血肿复发或进展的风险(5.3% vs 9.1%;Rr 0.58, 95%ci 0.39-0.86, p =0.03)。异质性很低(I2=22%)。在90天mRs 0-2、0-3评分方面,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P=0.73/ P=0.71)。安全性方面,MMAE联合传统治疗组180天死亡率为3.5%,传统治疗组为5.0% (P=0.49 bb0 0.05)。神经功能恶化方面,MMAE加传统治疗为4.6%,传统治疗为3.9%,差异无统计学意义(P=0.44 bb0 0.05)。在5项队列研究中,硬膜下血肿的复发、进展或再手术的发生率也得到了类似的结果(12.9% vs 40.6%;RR 0.26, 95%CI 0.07-0.95, P=0.04),但异质性非常高(I2 = 89%)。结论:本系统回顾和荟萃分析显示,在慢性硬膜下血肿患者中,与传统手术治疗相比,MMAE与降低硬膜下血肿的复发率、进展率或再手术率相关,且未增加死亡或不良事件的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cerebrovascular Diseases
Cerebrovascular Diseases 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: A rapidly-growing field, stroke and cerebrovascular research is unique in that it involves a variety of specialties such as neurology, internal medicine, surgery, radiology, epidemiology, cardiology, hematology, psychology and rehabilitation. ''Cerebrovascular Diseases'' is an international forum which meets the growing need for sophisticated, up-to-date scientific information on clinical data, diagnostic testing, and therapeutic issues, dealing with all aspects of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases. It contains original contributions, reviews of selected topics and clinical investigative studies, recent meeting reports and work-in-progress as well as discussions on controversial issues. All aspects related to clinical advances are considered, while purely experimental work appears if directly relevant to clinical issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信