{"title":"Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization in the Treatment of Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Shitai Ye, Sixi Zhang, Tianfang Li, Shuchao Wang, Xin Wang, Yong Deng, Longyang Yu, Qi Li, Xinggang Feng, Bingwu Jiang, Zhao Dai, Qifeng Guo, Qin Han, Wei Jin, Shujing Weng, Shunfu Jiang, Zhongming Qiu, Mohamad Abdalkader, Thanh N Nguyen","doi":"10.1159/000546001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There is increasing evidence that middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) can be used to treat chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH). The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of MMAE treatment through a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases to obtain articles related to MMAE from inception to December 3, 2024. The effectiveness outcomes were recurrence, progression, or reoperation of subdural hematoma after treatment, 90-day mRS 0-2, and 90-day mRS 0-3. The safety outcomes were severe deterioration of neurologic function and death within 180 days. The quality of the RCTs was evaluated with the Cochrane risk assessment tool, while the cohort studies were evaluated by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). The random-effect model was used to calculate the effect as risk ratio (RR). The heterogeneity of the results of each study was analyzed by χ2 test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 892 articles are retrieved. Among those, 4 RCTs and 5 cohort studies met the inclusion criteria. The RCT analysis showed that MMAE plus traditional treatment reduced the risk of recurrence or progression of hematoma compared with traditional treatment alone (5.3% vs. 9.1%; RR: 0.58, 95% CI, 0.39-0.86, p = 0.03). The heterogeneity was very low (I2 = 22%). There was no significant difference between the two groups for the 90-day mRS 0-2 and 0-3 scores (p = 0.73/p = 0.71, respectively). In terms of safety outcomes, the 180-day mortality was 3.5% in the MMAE plus traditional treatment group and 5.0% in the traditional treatment group (p = 0.49 > 0.05). Neurological deterioration was present in 4.6% of patients with MMAE plus traditional treatment compared to 3.9% with traditional treatment (p = 0.44 > 0.05). Across the 5 cohort studies, similar results were obtained for the incidence of recurrence, progression or reoperation of subdural hematoma (12.9% vs. 40.6%; RR: 0.26, 95% CI, 0.07-0.95, p = 0.04), but the heterogeneity was very high (I2 = 89%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis showed that in cSDH patients, MMAE was associated with a reduced rate of recurrence, progression or reoperation of the subdural hematoma compared to traditional treatment with surgery without increasing the incidence of death or adverse events.</p>","PeriodicalId":9683,"journal":{"name":"Cerebrovascular Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cerebrovascular Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000546001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: There is increasing evidence that middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) can be used to treat chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH). The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of MMAE treatment through a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
Methods: We searched the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases to obtain articles related to MMAE from inception to December 3, 2024. The effectiveness outcomes were recurrence, progression, or reoperation of subdural hematoma after treatment, 90-day mRS 0-2, and 90-day mRS 0-3. The safety outcomes were severe deterioration of neurologic function and death within 180 days. The quality of the RCTs was evaluated with the Cochrane risk assessment tool, while the cohort studies were evaluated by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). The random-effect model was used to calculate the effect as risk ratio (RR). The heterogeneity of the results of each study was analyzed by χ2 test.
Results: A total of 892 articles are retrieved. Among those, 4 RCTs and 5 cohort studies met the inclusion criteria. The RCT analysis showed that MMAE plus traditional treatment reduced the risk of recurrence or progression of hematoma compared with traditional treatment alone (5.3% vs. 9.1%; RR: 0.58, 95% CI, 0.39-0.86, p = 0.03). The heterogeneity was very low (I2 = 22%). There was no significant difference between the two groups for the 90-day mRS 0-2 and 0-3 scores (p = 0.73/p = 0.71, respectively). In terms of safety outcomes, the 180-day mortality was 3.5% in the MMAE plus traditional treatment group and 5.0% in the traditional treatment group (p = 0.49 > 0.05). Neurological deterioration was present in 4.6% of patients with MMAE plus traditional treatment compared to 3.9% with traditional treatment (p = 0.44 > 0.05). Across the 5 cohort studies, similar results were obtained for the incidence of recurrence, progression or reoperation of subdural hematoma (12.9% vs. 40.6%; RR: 0.26, 95% CI, 0.07-0.95, p = 0.04), but the heterogeneity was very high (I2 = 89%).
Conclusion: This systematic review and meta-analysis showed that in cSDH patients, MMAE was associated with a reduced rate of recurrence, progression or reoperation of the subdural hematoma compared to traditional treatment with surgery without increasing the incidence of death or adverse events.
期刊介绍:
A rapidly-growing field, stroke and cerebrovascular research is unique in that it involves a variety of specialties such as neurology, internal medicine, surgery, radiology, epidemiology, cardiology, hematology, psychology and rehabilitation. ''Cerebrovascular Diseases'' is an international forum which meets the growing need for sophisticated, up-to-date scientific information on clinical data, diagnostic testing, and therapeutic issues, dealing with all aspects of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases. It contains original contributions, reviews of selected topics and clinical investigative studies, recent meeting reports and work-in-progress as well as discussions on controversial issues. All aspects related to clinical advances are considered, while purely experimental work appears if directly relevant to clinical issues.