Alice R T Bergin, Luc Te Marvelde, Roger L Milne, Luis E Lara Gonzalez, Katie Meehan, Lisa J Spalding, Leanne Pilkington, Benjamin Dessauvagie, Jia-Min B Pang, Franco Caramia, Peter Savas, Jasmine Kay, Jianan Wang, Stephen J Luen, Jay Hamman, Andrea Casey, Nicole Watt, Roberto Salgado, Andrew D Redfern, Sue Evans, Gail Garvey, Sherene Loi
{"title":"Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander females and survival from breast cancer.","authors":"Alice R T Bergin, Luc Te Marvelde, Roger L Milne, Luis E Lara Gonzalez, Katie Meehan, Lisa J Spalding, Leanne Pilkington, Benjamin Dessauvagie, Jia-Min B Pang, Franco Caramia, Peter Savas, Jasmine Kay, Jianan Wang, Stephen J Luen, Jay Hamman, Andrea Casey, Nicole Watt, Roberto Salgado, Andrew D Redfern, Sue Evans, Gail Garvey, Sherene Loi","doi":"10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Despite access to universal health care, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander females (hereafter respectfully referred to as Aboriginal) in Australia have higher breast cancer incidence and mortality rates. We investigated factors contributing to these survival disparities. Methods Aboriginal females (n=395; 0.7%) and non-Aboriginal females (n=57 618; 99.3%) with breast cancer were identified from Victoria, Australia. Clinical, pathological, demographic, and socioeconomic variables were analyzed. Endpoints were all-cause and breast cancer-specific mortality. Hazard ratios (HR) were estimated using Cox regression. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) were evaluated from a subset of Aboriginal females and compared to females in TCGA. Results Registry data revealed that Aboriginal females were younger (P<0.001), had more advanced stage disease (P=0.007), were more likely to live in non-metropolitan areas (P<0.001) and in areas of greater disadvantage (P<0.001) compared to other females, at diagnosis. Age-adjusted multivariate analysis revealed a higher all-cause mortality risk (HR 1.27, 95%CI 1-1.61) for Aboriginal females, but this risk diminished for breast cancer specific mortality and after adjustment for stage and grade. Breast cancers from Aboriginal females had significantly reduced sTILs in the luminal and triple-negative subtypes, compared to TCGA. Conclusions Mortality for females with breast cancer was influenced by socio-economic, geographic and clinical factors. Notably, Aboriginal females with tumour features typically associated with favourable outcomes, experienced poorer outcomes. The reduced immune infiltrate warrants further investigation. Impact These findings highlight the need to address socioeconomic inequities and ensure culturally safe cancer care. Further research should explore biological and environmental factors influencing outcomes for Australian Aboriginal females.</p>","PeriodicalId":9458,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1526","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background Despite access to universal health care, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander females (hereafter respectfully referred to as Aboriginal) in Australia have higher breast cancer incidence and mortality rates. We investigated factors contributing to these survival disparities. Methods Aboriginal females (n=395; 0.7%) and non-Aboriginal females (n=57 618; 99.3%) with breast cancer were identified from Victoria, Australia. Clinical, pathological, demographic, and socioeconomic variables were analyzed. Endpoints were all-cause and breast cancer-specific mortality. Hazard ratios (HR) were estimated using Cox regression. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) were evaluated from a subset of Aboriginal females and compared to females in TCGA. Results Registry data revealed that Aboriginal females were younger (P<0.001), had more advanced stage disease (P=0.007), were more likely to live in non-metropolitan areas (P<0.001) and in areas of greater disadvantage (P<0.001) compared to other females, at diagnosis. Age-adjusted multivariate analysis revealed a higher all-cause mortality risk (HR 1.27, 95%CI 1-1.61) for Aboriginal females, but this risk diminished for breast cancer specific mortality and after adjustment for stage and grade. Breast cancers from Aboriginal females had significantly reduced sTILs in the luminal and triple-negative subtypes, compared to TCGA. Conclusions Mortality for females with breast cancer was influenced by socio-economic, geographic and clinical factors. Notably, Aboriginal females with tumour features typically associated with favourable outcomes, experienced poorer outcomes. The reduced immune infiltrate warrants further investigation. Impact These findings highlight the need to address socioeconomic inequities and ensure culturally safe cancer care. Further research should explore biological and environmental factors influencing outcomes for Australian Aboriginal females.
期刊介绍:
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention publishes original peer-reviewed, population-based research on cancer etiology, prevention, surveillance, and survivorship. The following topics are of special interest: descriptive, analytical, and molecular epidemiology; biomarkers including assay development, validation, and application; chemoprevention and other types of prevention research in the context of descriptive and observational studies; the role of behavioral factors in cancer etiology and prevention; survivorship studies; risk factors; implementation science and cancer care delivery; and the science of cancer health disparities. Besides welcoming manuscripts that address individual subjects in any of the relevant disciplines, CEBP editors encourage the submission of manuscripts with a transdisciplinary approach.