Co-Creating and Refining a Values Assessment Tool (VAsT) for Women With Metastatic Breast Cancer.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Lorinda A Coombs, Victoria Crowder, Madison Black, Kelly Tan, Emily M Ray, Renée M Ferrari, Erin E Kent, Daniel S Reuland, Ashley Leak Bryant
{"title":"Co-Creating and Refining a Values Assessment Tool (VAsT) for Women With Metastatic Breast Cancer.","authors":"Lorinda A Coombs, Victoria Crowder, Madison Black, Kelly Tan, Emily M Ray, Renée M Ferrari, Erin E Kent, Daniel S Reuland, Ashley Leak Bryant","doi":"10.1002/pon.70173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Patients with metastatic breast cancer (mBC) and their families often have differing perspectives on treatment goals. This highlights the need for systematically eliciting patients' and care partners' values to ensure values-aligned treatment decisions. This study aimed to inform the development of a values assessment tool to facilitate communication of priorities and preferences with oncology clinicians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two rounds of semi-structured interviews were conducted with women with mBC from the Southeastern and Northeastern U.S. Recruitment included at least 50% of participants identifying as African American/Black, Latinx, Asian, American Indian, or Native American.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The initial round of 13 interviews yielded eight candidate domains. After confirmatory interviews with additional participants, the researchers identified nine final domains relevant to treatment decisions for mBC: desire not to appear sick; desire to help other women with breast cancer by participating in clinical research; financial concerns; living to care for a loved one; maintaining sexuality; maintaining quality of life; maximizing time away from medical appointments; minimizing and managing side effects; and slowing disease progression with an effective treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Eliciting treatment decision values across multiple domains and effectively communicating them with clinicians is a crucial aspect of patient-centered care to align values with care goals. To help patients identify and express their values to clinicians, we are developing a values assessment tool specifically for mBC. Future research will pilot this tool to assess its impact on communication between clinicians and patients and health outcomes for women with mBC.</p>","PeriodicalId":20779,"journal":{"name":"Psycho‐Oncology","volume":"34 5","pages":"e70173"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12061624/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psycho‐Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.70173","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Patients with metastatic breast cancer (mBC) and their families often have differing perspectives on treatment goals. This highlights the need for systematically eliciting patients' and care partners' values to ensure values-aligned treatment decisions. This study aimed to inform the development of a values assessment tool to facilitate communication of priorities and preferences with oncology clinicians.

Methods: Two rounds of semi-structured interviews were conducted with women with mBC from the Southeastern and Northeastern U.S. Recruitment included at least 50% of participants identifying as African American/Black, Latinx, Asian, American Indian, or Native American.

Results: The initial round of 13 interviews yielded eight candidate domains. After confirmatory interviews with additional participants, the researchers identified nine final domains relevant to treatment decisions for mBC: desire not to appear sick; desire to help other women with breast cancer by participating in clinical research; financial concerns; living to care for a loved one; maintaining sexuality; maintaining quality of life; maximizing time away from medical appointments; minimizing and managing side effects; and slowing disease progression with an effective treatment.

Conclusion: Eliciting treatment decision values across multiple domains and effectively communicating them with clinicians is a crucial aspect of patient-centered care to align values with care goals. To help patients identify and express their values to clinicians, we are developing a values assessment tool specifically for mBC. Future research will pilot this tool to assess its impact on communication between clinicians and patients and health outcomes for women with mBC.

共同创建和完善转移性乳腺癌妇女价值评估工具(VAsT)。
背景和目的:转移性乳腺癌(mBC)患者及其家属通常对治疗目标有不同的看法。这突出表明需要系统地了解患者和护理伙伴的价值观,以确保价值观一致的治疗决策。本研究旨在为价值评估工具的开发提供信息,以促进与肿瘤临床医生的优先事项和偏好沟通。方法:对来自美国东南部和东北部的mBC女性进行了两轮半结构化访谈。招募的参与者中至少有50%是非洲裔美国人/黑人、拉丁裔、亚洲人、美洲印第安人或美洲原住民。结果:最初的13次面试产生了8个候选领域。在与其他参与者进行确认性访谈后,研究人员确定了与mBC治疗决策相关的九个最终领域:不生病的愿望;希望通过参与临床研究来帮助其他患有乳腺癌的妇女;金融问题;活着是为了照顾所爱的人;保持性;维持生活质素;最大限度地利用医疗预约之外的时间;尽量减少和管理副作用;通过有效的治疗来减缓疾病的发展。结论:获取跨多个领域的治疗决策价值并与临床医生进行有效沟通是以患者为中心的护理的关键方面,以使价值观与护理目标保持一致。为了帮助患者识别并向临床医生表达他们的价值观,我们正在开发一种专门针对mBC的价值观评估工具。未来的研究将对该工具进行试点,以评估其对临床医生和患者之间的沟通以及患有mBC的妇女的健康结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psycho‐Oncology
Psycho‐Oncology 医学-心理学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
220
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Psycho-Oncology is concerned with the psychological, social, behavioral, and ethical aspects of cancer. This subspeciality addresses the two major psychological dimensions of cancer: the psychological responses of patients to cancer at all stages of the disease, and that of their families and caretakers; and the psychological, behavioral and social factors that may influence the disease process. Psycho-oncology is an area of multi-disciplinary interest and has boundaries with the major specialities in oncology: the clinical disciplines (surgery, medicine, pediatrics, radiotherapy), epidemiology, immunology, endocrinology, biology, pathology, bioethics, palliative care, rehabilitation medicine, clinical trials research and decision making, as well as psychiatry and psychology. This international journal is published twelve times a year and will consider contributions to research of clinical and theoretical interest. Topics covered are wide-ranging and relate to the psychosocial aspects of cancer and AIDS-related tumors, including: epidemiology, quality of life, palliative and supportive care, psychiatry, psychology, sociology, social work, nursing and educational issues. Special reviews are offered from time to time. There is a section reviewing recently published books. A society news section is available for the dissemination of information relating to meetings, conferences and other society-related topics. Summary proceedings of important national and international symposia falling within the aims of the journal are presented.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信