Correlation between systemic bleeding during thrombolysis and intracranial hemorrhage after thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-10 DOI:10.1080/14737175.2025.2491674
Xin-Lei Mao, Si-Si He, Ya-Xi Zhang, Cai-Dan Lin, Xin-Xin Chen, Shi-Zheng Zhang, Li-Na Ge, Qing-Qing Zhuang
{"title":"Correlation between systemic bleeding during thrombolysis and intracranial hemorrhage after thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke.","authors":"Xin-Lei Mao, Si-Si He, Ya-Xi Zhang, Cai-Dan Lin, Xin-Xin Chen, Shi-Zheng Zhang, Li-Na Ge, Qing-Qing Zhuang","doi":"10.1080/14737175.2025.2491674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current models primarily predict outcomes before thrombolytic therapy. This study explored if systemic bleeding during thrombolysis predicts hemorrhagic transformation (HT) within 36 hours post-thrombolysis.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Data from 591 acute ischemic stroke patients treated with rt-PA at Wenzhou Central Hospital (2016-2023) were prospectively collected and analyzed. The incidence of systemic bleeding was compared with the Stroke Prognostication using Age and the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (Span100) index, as well as the Hemorrhage After Thrombolysis (HAT) scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Systemic bleeding occurred in 285 patients, including 92 with HT. The HT rate was significantly higher in patients with late-onset oral bleeding (35.90%) or other systemic bleeding (38.89%) than in those without (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Late-onset oral and systemic bleeding during thrombolysis predicted HT in anterior circulation infarction (<i>p</i> < 0.001) but not in posterior circulation infarction (<i>p</i> = 0.70). The AUC for predicting HT was 0.578 for these bleeding types, versus 0.568 for Span-100 and 0.61 for HAT. Incorporating bleeding types increased Span-100 sensitivity to 0.623 and HAT to 0.648.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Late-onset oral and other systemic bleeding during thrombolysis effectively predict HT in anterior circulation infarction, enhancing the sensitivity of Span100 and HAT scales when combined.</p>","PeriodicalId":12190,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"727-735"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737175.2025.2491674","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Current models primarily predict outcomes before thrombolytic therapy. This study explored if systemic bleeding during thrombolysis predicts hemorrhagic transformation (HT) within 36 hours post-thrombolysis.

Research design and methods: Data from 591 acute ischemic stroke patients treated with rt-PA at Wenzhou Central Hospital (2016-2023) were prospectively collected and analyzed. The incidence of systemic bleeding was compared with the Stroke Prognostication using Age and the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (Span100) index, as well as the Hemorrhage After Thrombolysis (HAT) scale.

Results: Systemic bleeding occurred in 285 patients, including 92 with HT. The HT rate was significantly higher in patients with late-onset oral bleeding (35.90%) or other systemic bleeding (38.89%) than in those without (p < 0.01). Late-onset oral and systemic bleeding during thrombolysis predicted HT in anterior circulation infarction (p < 0.001) but not in posterior circulation infarction (p = 0.70). The AUC for predicting HT was 0.578 for these bleeding types, versus 0.568 for Span-100 and 0.61 for HAT. Incorporating bleeding types increased Span-100 sensitivity to 0.623 and HAT to 0.648.

Conclusions: Late-onset oral and other systemic bleeding during thrombolysis effectively predict HT in anterior circulation infarction, enhancing the sensitivity of Span100 and HAT scales when combined.

急性缺血性脑卒中溶栓时全身性出血与溶栓后颅内出血的相关性。
背景:目前的模型主要预测溶栓治疗前的预后。本研究探讨溶栓期间全身性出血是否预示溶栓后36小时内的出血性转化(HT)。研究设计与方法:前瞻性收集2016-2023年温州市中心医院591例接受rt-PA治疗的急性缺血性脑卒中患者资料并进行分析。采用年龄、美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(Span100)指数以及溶栓后出血(HAT)量表,将全体性出血的发生率与卒中预后进行比较。结果:全身性出血285例,其中HT 92例。有迟发性口腔出血(35.90%)或其他全身性出血(38.89%)的患者HT率明显高于无迟发性口腔出血的患者(p p p = 0.70)。这些出血类型预测HT的AUC为0.578,而Span-100的AUC为0.568,HAT的AUC为0.61。合并出血类型将Span-100敏感性提高到0.623,HAT提高到0.648。结论:溶栓过程中迟发性口服及其他全体性出血可有效预测前循环梗死HT,联合使用Span100和HAT量表可提高敏感性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics
Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
2.30%
发文量
61
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics (ISSN 1473-7175) provides expert reviews on the use of drugs and medicines in clinical neurology and neuropsychiatry. Coverage includes disease management, new medicines and drugs in neurology, therapeutic indications, diagnostics, medical treatment guidelines and neurological diseases such as stroke, epilepsy, Alzheimer''s and Parkinson''s. Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Review format and includes the following sections: Expert Opinion - a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信