{"title":"A Systematic Review of Mortality Risk Prediction Models for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.","authors":"Yingxu Wu, Pin Li, Mei Wang, Yongming Liu, Jiapeng Leng, Xuetao Li, Xiaodong Lv, Lijian Pang, Ningzi Zang","doi":"10.12968/hmed.2024.0934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aims/Background</b> Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is associated with an increased mortality risk. However, the factors that contribute to this risk remain unknown. This study aimed to systematically review existing predictive models for IPF-related mortality and to evaluate prognostic factors associated with patient outcomes. <b>Methods</b> A comprehensive literature search was conducted on PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase for studies on IPF mortality risk prediction models published between 1 January 1984 and 15 November 2024. Two independent reviewers screened, extracted, and cross-checked the data. The risk of bias and model applicability were also evaluated. <b>Results</b> A total of 17 risk prediction models were identified. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) ranged from 0.728 to 0.907, while the model validation results ranged from 0.750 to 0.920. The concordance index (C-index) of 10 studies was more than 0.7, indicating good predictive performance. This study encompassed a total of 17 risk prediction models incorporating between 3 and 8 combined prognostic variables, with the most frequently included predictors being forced vital capacity as a percentage of the predicted value (FVC%pred), carbon monoxide diffusion capacity as a percentage of the predicted value (DLCO%pred), gender, age, six-minute walk test (6MWT) results, and dyspnea severity. <b>Conclusion</b> Current IPF mortality risk prediction models remain in an exploratory phase, with a generally high risk of bias. Furthermore, the lack of external validation in some models limits their generalizability. Future research should focus on improving the applicability of the model to enhance clinical application.</p>","PeriodicalId":9256,"journal":{"name":"British journal of hospital medicine","volume":"86 4","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of hospital medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/hmed.2024.0934","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims/Background Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is associated with an increased mortality risk. However, the factors that contribute to this risk remain unknown. This study aimed to systematically review existing predictive models for IPF-related mortality and to evaluate prognostic factors associated with patient outcomes. Methods A comprehensive literature search was conducted on PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase for studies on IPF mortality risk prediction models published between 1 January 1984 and 15 November 2024. Two independent reviewers screened, extracted, and cross-checked the data. The risk of bias and model applicability were also evaluated. Results A total of 17 risk prediction models were identified. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) ranged from 0.728 to 0.907, while the model validation results ranged from 0.750 to 0.920. The concordance index (C-index) of 10 studies was more than 0.7, indicating good predictive performance. This study encompassed a total of 17 risk prediction models incorporating between 3 and 8 combined prognostic variables, with the most frequently included predictors being forced vital capacity as a percentage of the predicted value (FVC%pred), carbon monoxide diffusion capacity as a percentage of the predicted value (DLCO%pred), gender, age, six-minute walk test (6MWT) results, and dyspnea severity. Conclusion Current IPF mortality risk prediction models remain in an exploratory phase, with a generally high risk of bias. Furthermore, the lack of external validation in some models limits their generalizability. Future research should focus on improving the applicability of the model to enhance clinical application.
期刊介绍:
British Journal of Hospital Medicine was established in 1966, and is still true to its origins: a monthly, peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary review journal for hospital doctors and doctors in training.
The journal publishes an authoritative mix of clinical reviews, education and training updates, quality improvement projects and case reports, and book reviews from recognized leaders in the profession. The Core Training for Doctors section provides clinical information in an easily accessible format for doctors in training.
British Journal of Hospital Medicine is an invaluable resource for hospital doctors at all stages of their career.
The journal is indexed on Medline, CINAHL, the Sociedad Iberoamericana de Información Científica and Scopus.