Bridging the ESG Credibility Gap: The Role of Institutional Investors in Mitigating ESG Decoupling

IF 12.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Catarina Cepêda, Albertina Paula Monteiro, Beatriz Aibar‐Guzmán
{"title":"Bridging the ESG Credibility Gap: The Role of Institutional Investors in Mitigating ESG Decoupling","authors":"Catarina Cepêda, Albertina Paula Monteiro, Beatriz Aibar‐Guzmán","doi":"10.1002/bse.4336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Because of their capacity for sustained and informed monitoring, institutional investors are uniquely positioned to enhance corporate transparency and mitigate ESG decoupling, the gap between corporate sustainability rhetoric and reality. This study examines whether and under what circumstances institutional ownership contributes to aligning ESG disclosure with actual sustainability performance. Analysing an international sample of 3465 listed companies (13,488 firm‐year observations) from 2009 to 2023, we find that institutional investors play a crucial role in reducing ESG decoupling. However, this effect depends on their investment horizon: long‐term institutional investors mitigate ESG decoupling, whereas short‐term institutional investors exacerbate it. These findings contribute to the corporate governance and sustainability literature by showing that institutional investors are not a homogeneous group and that their monitoring effectiveness varies depending on their investment horizon. From a practical perspective, our results highlight the need for regulatory initiatives that incentivise long‐term institutional engagement and more stringent ESG reporting requirements to curb opportunistic disclosure practices.","PeriodicalId":9518,"journal":{"name":"Business Strategy and The Environment","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Strategy and The Environment","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.4336","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Because of their capacity for sustained and informed monitoring, institutional investors are uniquely positioned to enhance corporate transparency and mitigate ESG decoupling, the gap between corporate sustainability rhetoric and reality. This study examines whether and under what circumstances institutional ownership contributes to aligning ESG disclosure with actual sustainability performance. Analysing an international sample of 3465 listed companies (13,488 firm‐year observations) from 2009 to 2023, we find that institutional investors play a crucial role in reducing ESG decoupling. However, this effect depends on their investment horizon: long‐term institutional investors mitigate ESG decoupling, whereas short‐term institutional investors exacerbate it. These findings contribute to the corporate governance and sustainability literature by showing that institutional investors are not a homogeneous group and that their monitoring effectiveness varies depending on their investment horizon. From a practical perspective, our results highlight the need for regulatory initiatives that incentivise long‐term institutional engagement and more stringent ESG reporting requirements to curb opportunistic disclosure practices.
弥合ESG信誉差距:机构投资者在缓解ESG脱钩中的作用
由于机构投资者有能力进行持续和知情的监督,他们在提高企业透明度和缓解ESG脱钩(企业可持续性言论与现实之间的差距)方面处于独特的地位。本研究考察了机构所有权是否以及在何种情况下有助于将ESG披露与实际可持续性绩效相一致。通过对2009年至2023年3465家上市公司(13488家公司年观察)的国际样本分析,我们发现机构投资者在减少ESG脱钩方面发挥了至关重要的作用。然而,这种影响取决于他们的投资范围:长期机构投资者缓解了ESG脱钩,而短期机构投资者则加剧了ESG脱钩。这些发现有助于公司治理和可持续性文献,表明机构投资者不是一个同质群体,他们的监测有效性取决于他们的投资范围。从实践的角度来看,我们的研究结果强调了监管举措的必要性,以激励长期机构参与和更严格的ESG报告要求,以遏制投机披露行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
22.50
自引率
19.40%
发文量
336
期刊介绍: Business Strategy and the Environment (BSE) is a leading academic journal focused on business strategies for improving the natural environment. It publishes peer-reviewed research on various topics such as systems and standards, environmental performance, disclosure, eco-innovation, corporate environmental management tools, organizations and management, supply chains, circular economy, governance, green finance, industry sectors, and responses to climate change and other contemporary environmental issues. The journal aims to provide original contributions that enhance the understanding of sustainability in business. Its target audience includes academics, practitioners, business managers, and consultants. However, BSE does not accept papers on corporate social responsibility (CSR), as this topic is covered by its sibling journal Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. The journal is indexed in several databases and collections such as ABI/INFORM Collection, Agricultural & Environmental Science Database, BIOBASE, Emerald Management Reviews, GeoArchive, Environment Index, GEOBASE, INSPEC, Technology Collection, and Web of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信