"Why shouldn't I expect a lot from life?" - a qualitative study of what facilitates long-term recovery in first-episode psychosis.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Gina Åsbø, Hanne Haavind, Sindre Hembre Kruse, Kristin Fjelnseth Wold, Wenche Ten Velden Hegelstad, Kristin Lie Romm, Mike Slade, Torill Ueland, Ingrid Melle, Carmen Simonsen
{"title":"\"Why shouldn't I expect a lot from life?\" - a qualitative study of what facilitates long-term recovery in first-episode psychosis.","authors":"Gina Åsbø, Hanne Haavind, Sindre Hembre Kruse, Kristin Fjelnseth Wold, Wenche Ten Velden Hegelstad, Kristin Lie Romm, Mike Slade, Torill Ueland, Ingrid Melle, Carmen Simonsen","doi":"10.1186/s12888-025-06681-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Qualitative research frequently characterises recovery, but more knowledge on subjective experiences of facilitators of long-term recovery in psychosis is needed. This interview study aimed to explore what people with first-episode psychosis (FEP) highlight as important for their long-term recovery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Interviews with 20 individuals in recovery (personal and/or clinical) participating in two follow-up studies, 10 and 20-years after treatment start for a first episode schizophrenia or bipolar spectrum disorder. Interviews were thematically analysed by a research team that included a peer researcher.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis generated that personal resources and agency were experienced as the overarching facilitators of recovery, with five themes: (1) Doing recovery in everyday life, involving agency in daily life; (2) Re-evaluating risk, involving re-evaluating limitations and stress reduction; (3) Becoming a caregiver, involving development from being cared for to taking care of others; (4) Negotiating normality, involving identity and social inclusion; (5) Owning and sharing your story, involving accepting lived experience and overcoming stigma.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>All participants described themselves as the main facilitators of their own recovery, and treatment as secondary to their efforts. Gradually testing limitations and taking risks, providing social support to others, as well as owning and sharing your story were crucial for promoting long-term recovery in FEP. Clinical implications include supporting service users' agency with strength- based interventions and shared-decision making, as well as refining psychoeducation on stress reduction in a long-term perspective.</p>","PeriodicalId":9029,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychiatry","volume":"25 1","pages":"423"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12036267/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-025-06681-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Qualitative research frequently characterises recovery, but more knowledge on subjective experiences of facilitators of long-term recovery in psychosis is needed. This interview study aimed to explore what people with first-episode psychosis (FEP) highlight as important for their long-term recovery.

Methods: Interviews with 20 individuals in recovery (personal and/or clinical) participating in two follow-up studies, 10 and 20-years after treatment start for a first episode schizophrenia or bipolar spectrum disorder. Interviews were thematically analysed by a research team that included a peer researcher.

Results: The analysis generated that personal resources and agency were experienced as the overarching facilitators of recovery, with five themes: (1) Doing recovery in everyday life, involving agency in daily life; (2) Re-evaluating risk, involving re-evaluating limitations and stress reduction; (3) Becoming a caregiver, involving development from being cared for to taking care of others; (4) Negotiating normality, involving identity and social inclusion; (5) Owning and sharing your story, involving accepting lived experience and overcoming stigma.

Discussion: All participants described themselves as the main facilitators of their own recovery, and treatment as secondary to their efforts. Gradually testing limitations and taking risks, providing social support to others, as well as owning and sharing your story were crucial for promoting long-term recovery in FEP. Clinical implications include supporting service users' agency with strength- based interventions and shared-decision making, as well as refining psychoeducation on stress reduction in a long-term perspective.

“我为什么不能对生活抱有更多的期望呢?”-一项关于促进首发精神病长期康复的定性研究。
背景:定性研究经常描述康复的特征,但需要更多关于精神病长期康复促进者的主观经验的知识。本访谈研究旨在探讨首发精神病患者(FEP)对其长期康复的重要意义。方法:对20名参与两项随访研究的康复者(个人和/或临床)进行访谈,随访时间为首次发作精神分裂症或双相情感障碍治疗开始后10年和20年。访谈由包括同行研究员在内的一个研究小组按主题进行分析。结果:个体资源和能动性是康复的主要促进因素,有五个主题:(1)在日常生活中进行康复,在日常生活中参与能动性;(2)重新评估风险,包括重新评估限制和减少压力;(3)成为照顾者,包括从被照顾发展到照顾他人;(4)协商常态,涉及身份认同和社会包容;(5)拥有和分享你的故事,包括接受生活经历和克服耻辱。讨论:所有参与者都将自己描述为自己康复的主要促进者,治疗是他们努力的次要因素。逐步测试极限和承担风险,为他人提供社会支持,以及拥有和分享你的故事对于促进FEP的长期恢复至关重要。临床意义包括以力量为基础的干预和共同决策支持服务使用者的代理,以及从长远角度改进心理教育以减轻压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Psychiatry
BMC Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
716
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychiatry is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of psychiatric disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信