Patient portal messaging to address delayed follow-up for uncontrolled diabetes: a pragmatic, randomised clinical trial.

IF 5.6 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Arielle R Nagler, Leora Idit Horwitz, Aamina Ahmed, Amrita Mukhopadhyay, Isaac Dapkins, William King, Simon A Jones, Adam Szerencsy, Claudia Pulgarin, Jennifer Gray, Tony Mei, Saul Blecker
{"title":"Patient portal messaging to address delayed follow-up for uncontrolled diabetes: a pragmatic, randomised clinical trial.","authors":"Arielle R Nagler, Leora Idit Horwitz, Aamina Ahmed, Amrita Mukhopadhyay, Isaac Dapkins, William King, Simon A Jones, Adam Szerencsy, Claudia Pulgarin, Jennifer Gray, Tony Mei, Saul Blecker","doi":"10.1136/bmjqs-2024-018249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Patients with poor glycaemic control have a high risk for major cardiovascular events. Improving glycaemic monitoring in patients with diabetes can improve morbidity and mortality.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the effectiveness of a patient portal message in prompting patients with poorly controlled diabetes without a recent glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) result to have their HbA1c repeated.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A pragmatic, randomised clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A large academic health system consisting of over 350 ambulatory practices.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Patients who had an HbA1c greater than 10% who had not had a repeat HbA1c in the prior 6 months.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>A single electronic health record (EHR)-based patient portal message to prompt patients to have a repeat HbA1c test versus usual care.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes: </strong>The primary outcome was a follow-up HbA1c test result within 90 days of randomisation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 2573 patients with a mean (SD) HbA1c of 11.2%. Among 1317 patients in the intervention group, 24.2% had follow-up HbA1c tests completed within 90 days, versus 21.1% of 1256 patients in the control group (p=0.07). Patients in the intervention group were more likely to log into the patient portal within 60 days as compared with the control group (61.2% vs 52.3%, p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among patients with poorly controlled diabetes and no recent HbA1c result, a brief patient portal message did not significantly increase follow-up testing but did increase patient engagement with the patient portal. Automated patient messages could be considered as a part of multipronged efforts to involve patients in their diabetes care.</p>","PeriodicalId":9077,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Quality & Safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Quality & Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2024-018249","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Patients with poor glycaemic control have a high risk for major cardiovascular events. Improving glycaemic monitoring in patients with diabetes can improve morbidity and mortality.

Objective: To assess the effectiveness of a patient portal message in prompting patients with poorly controlled diabetes without a recent glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) result to have their HbA1c repeated.

Design: A pragmatic, randomised clinical trial.

Setting: A large academic health system consisting of over 350 ambulatory practices.

Participants: Patients who had an HbA1c greater than 10% who had not had a repeat HbA1c in the prior 6 months.

Exposures: A single electronic health record (EHR)-based patient portal message to prompt patients to have a repeat HbA1c test versus usual care.

Main outcomes: The primary outcome was a follow-up HbA1c test result within 90 days of randomisation.

Results: The study included 2573 patients with a mean (SD) HbA1c of 11.2%. Among 1317 patients in the intervention group, 24.2% had follow-up HbA1c tests completed within 90 days, versus 21.1% of 1256 patients in the control group (p=0.07). Patients in the intervention group were more likely to log into the patient portal within 60 days as compared with the control group (61.2% vs 52.3%, p<0.001).

Conclusions: Among patients with poorly controlled diabetes and no recent HbA1c result, a brief patient portal message did not significantly increase follow-up testing but did increase patient engagement with the patient portal. Automated patient messages could be considered as a part of multipronged efforts to involve patients in their diabetes care.

患者门户信息传递解决未控制糖尿病延迟随访:一项实用的随机临床试验。
重要性:血糖控制不良的患者发生主要心血管事件的风险较高。改善糖尿病患者的血糖监测可以改善发病率和死亡率。目的:评估患者门户信息在提示近期无糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)结果控制不良的糖尿病患者重复其HbA1c的有效性。设计:一项实用的随机临床试验。设置:一个大型学术卫生系统,由350多个门诊实践组成。参与者:HbA1c大于10%且在过去6个月内没有重复HbA1c的患者。暴露:基于单一电子健康记录(EHR)的患者门户信息提示患者与常规护理相比进行重复HbA1c检测。主要结局:主要结局为随机分组后90天内的随访HbA1c检测结果。结果:该研究纳入2573例患者,平均(SD) HbA1c为11.2%。在干预组的1317例患者中,24.2%的患者在90天内完成了随访HbA1c检测,而对照组的1256例患者中有21.1% (p=0.07)。与对照组相比,干预组患者更有可能在60天内登录患者门户(61.2% vs 52.3%)。结论:在糖尿病控制不佳且近期没有HbA1c结果的患者中,简短的患者门户信息并未显著增加随访检测,但确实增加了患者对患者门户的参与度。自动患者信息可以被认为是多管齐下的努力的一部分,让患者参与到他们的糖尿病护理中来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Quality & Safety
BMJ Quality & Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
104
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Quality & Safety (previously Quality & Safety in Health Care) is an international peer review publication providing research, opinions, debates and reviews for academics, clinicians and healthcare managers focused on the quality and safety of health care and the science of improvement. The journal receives approximately 1000 manuscripts a year and has an acceptance rate for original research of 12%. Time from submission to first decision averages 22 days and accepted articles are typically published online within 20 days. Its current impact factor is 3.281.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信