Relevance of the LOEM Classification in Chronic Rhinosinusitis Management: A Retrospective Analysis of Surgical Outcomes.

IF 7.2 2区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Daniel Martin-Jimenez, Meritxell Clari-Comes, Miriam Gonzalez-Garcia, Juan Maza-Solano, Jaime Gonzalez-Garcia, Alfonso Del Cuvillo, Ramon Moreno-Luna, Serafin Sanchez-Gomez
{"title":"Relevance of the LOEM Classification in Chronic Rhinosinusitis Management: A Retrospective Analysis of Surgical Outcomes.","authors":"Daniel Martin-Jimenez, Meritxell Clari-Comes, Miriam Gonzalez-Garcia, Juan Maza-Solano, Jaime Gonzalez-Garcia, Alfonso Del Cuvillo, Ramon Moreno-Luna, Serafin Sanchez-Gomez","doi":"10.1002/alr.23594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The lack of a standardized framework for defining endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) has led to ambiguity and inconsistency in surgical descriptions. This study evaluates the recently described lamella ostium extent mucosa (LOEM) classification's usefulness, aiming to solidify its role in enhancing clinical decision-making and the reproducibility of surgical studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A nonrandomized retrospective study compared CRS patients who underwent ESS, categorized into four groups based on LOEM. Baseline characteristics, disease severity, and QoL were compared at baseline and 2 years postsurgery. Predictors of clinically meaningful improvements in QoL were assessed using linear and logistic regression models, analyzing changes in the Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT)-22. Additionally, a subgroup analysis evaluated QoL outcomes specific to different clinical phenotypes and the ESS type (t) performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>305 patients were analyzed, with significant baseline differences across ESS groups, showing increasing disease severity and comorbidities from t1 to t4 surgeries. The t4 ESS showed the greatest postoperative improvements in SNOT-22, nasal polyp score, and Lund Mackay scale. Multivariate regression confirmed t4 ESS as a significant predictor of greater QoL improvements and higher responder rates (OR = 8.49, p = 0.036). Subgroup analyses found that prior ESS negatively impacted outcomes, while t4 ESS was more effective across CRS phenotypes, except in exclusive atopy, where t3 ESS proved superior.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The LOEM classification correlates surgical complexity with disease burden. The t4 ESS demonstrated superior clinical outcomes, particularly in CRS patients with poorly controlled asthma, severe N-ERD, or several prior ESS. These findings underscore the importance of personalized surgical planning and the potential utility of the LOEM system in optimizing patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":13716,"journal":{"name":"International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology","volume":" ","pages":"e23594"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.23594","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The lack of a standardized framework for defining endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) has led to ambiguity and inconsistency in surgical descriptions. This study evaluates the recently described lamella ostium extent mucosa (LOEM) classification's usefulness, aiming to solidify its role in enhancing clinical decision-making and the reproducibility of surgical studies.

Methods: A nonrandomized retrospective study compared CRS patients who underwent ESS, categorized into four groups based on LOEM. Baseline characteristics, disease severity, and QoL were compared at baseline and 2 years postsurgery. Predictors of clinically meaningful improvements in QoL were assessed using linear and logistic regression models, analyzing changes in the Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT)-22. Additionally, a subgroup analysis evaluated QoL outcomes specific to different clinical phenotypes and the ESS type (t) performed.

Results: 305 patients were analyzed, with significant baseline differences across ESS groups, showing increasing disease severity and comorbidities from t1 to t4 surgeries. The t4 ESS showed the greatest postoperative improvements in SNOT-22, nasal polyp score, and Lund Mackay scale. Multivariate regression confirmed t4 ESS as a significant predictor of greater QoL improvements and higher responder rates (OR = 8.49, p = 0.036). Subgroup analyses found that prior ESS negatively impacted outcomes, while t4 ESS was more effective across CRS phenotypes, except in exclusive atopy, where t3 ESS proved superior.

Conclusions: The LOEM classification correlates surgical complexity with disease burden. The t4 ESS demonstrated superior clinical outcomes, particularly in CRS patients with poorly controlled asthma, severe N-ERD, or several prior ESS. These findings underscore the importance of personalized surgical planning and the potential utility of the LOEM system in optimizing patient outcomes.

LOEM分类与慢性鼻窦炎治疗的相关性:手术结果的回顾性分析。
背景:慢性鼻窦炎(CRS)中内镜鼻窦手术(ESS)的定义缺乏标准化框架,导致手术描述的模糊性和不一致性。本研究评估最近描述的板层口范围粘膜(LOEM)分类的实用性,旨在巩固其在提高临床决策和外科研究可重复性方面的作用。方法:一项非随机回顾性研究比较了接受ESS治疗的CRS患者,根据LOEM分为四组。在基线和术后2年比较基线特征、疾病严重程度和生活质量。使用线性和逻辑回归模型评估临床有意义的生活质量改善的预测因子,分析鼻窦结局测试(SNOT)-22的变化。此外,亚组分析评估了特定于不同临床表型和ESS类型(t)的生活质量结果。结果:305例患者被分析,在ESS组之间有显著的基线差异,从t1到t4手术显示疾病严重程度和合并症增加。术后t4 ESS在SNOT-22、鼻息肉评分和Lund Mackay评分方面改善最大。多因素回归证实t4 ESS是更大的生活质量改善和更高的应答率的重要预测因子(OR = 8.49, p = 0.036)。亚组分析发现,先前的ESS会对结果产生负面影响,而t4 ESS在所有CRS表型中都更有效,除了在排他特应性中,t3 ESS被证明是更好的。结论:LOEM分类与手术复杂性和疾病负担相关。t4 ESS表现出优越的临床结果,特别是在患有控制不良的哮喘、严重N-ERD或先前有多次ESS的CRS患者中。这些发现强调了个性化手术计划的重要性以及LOEM系统在优化患者预后方面的潜在效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
10.90%
发文量
185
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Forum of Allergy & Rhinologyis a peer-reviewed scientific journal, and the Official Journal of the American Rhinologic Society and the American Academy of Otolaryngic Allergy. International Forum of Allergy Rhinology provides a forum for clinical researchers, basic scientists, clinicians, and others to publish original research and explore controversies in the medical and surgical treatment of patients with otolaryngic allergy, rhinologic, and skull base conditions. The application of current research to the management of otolaryngic allergy, rhinologic, and skull base diseases and the need for further investigation will be highlighted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信