A Comparative Analysis of Mobile versus Stationary Mammography Units: Performance and Outcomes in a Breast Cancer Screening Program.

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Breast Cancer : Targets and Therapy Pub Date : 2025-05-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/BCTT.S516918
Daniele Ugo Tari, Davide Raffaele De Lucia, Rosalinda Santonastaso, Marika Santarsiere, Amedeo Blasotti
{"title":"A Comparative Analysis of Mobile versus Stationary Mammography Units: Performance and Outcomes in a Breast Cancer Screening Program.","authors":"Daniele Ugo Tari, Davide Raffaele De Lucia, Rosalinda Santonastaso, Marika Santarsiere, Amedeo Blasotti","doi":"10.2147/BCTT.S516918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Breast cancer screening programs often encounter challenges related to high costs and limited accessibility, particularly in rural areas. Mobile mammography units (MMUs) have emerged as a potential solution to address these barriers. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of mammography screenings conducted in fixed units and MMUs, focusing on recall rates, follow-up adherence, and screen-detected breast cancer (BC) rates.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This retrospective study analyzed data from 790 women aged 50-69 years who underwent mammography screening between January and February 2023. Participants were divided into two groups: group A (525 women, screened at fixed units) and group B (265 women, screened at MMUs). Key metrics included recall rates, biopsy rates, screen-detected BC rates, and refusal rates for follow-up evaluations. Statistical comparisons were made between the two groups to assess differences in outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In group A (mean age 58.8 ± 5.7 years), the recall rate was 6.1%, with 32 recalls, 8 biopsies, and 7 confirmed BC cases, yielding a screen-detected BC rate of 1.33%. In group B (mean age 59.6 ± 5.8 years), the recall rate was higher at 10.6%, with 28 recalls, 5 biopsies, and 3 BC cases, resulting in a screen-detected BC rate of 1.13%. Notably, refusal rates for follow-up evaluations were significantly higher in group B (42.9%) compared to group A (9%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While MMUs improve accessibility to underserved areas, they face challenges such as higher refusal rates for follow-up evaluations. The comparable screen-detected BC rates between MMUs and fixed units underscore the potential of combining both approaches in breast cancer screening programs. These findings highlight the importance of awareness campaigns to improve follow-up adherence and suggest that future research should focus on cost-effectiveness and sociocultural factors to optimize breast cancer prevention strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":9106,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer : Targets and Therapy","volume":"17 ","pages":"373-383"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12067976/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer : Targets and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/BCTT.S516918","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Breast cancer screening programs often encounter challenges related to high costs and limited accessibility, particularly in rural areas. Mobile mammography units (MMUs) have emerged as a potential solution to address these barriers. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of mammography screenings conducted in fixed units and MMUs, focusing on recall rates, follow-up adherence, and screen-detected breast cancer (BC) rates.

Patients and methods: This retrospective study analyzed data from 790 women aged 50-69 years who underwent mammography screening between January and February 2023. Participants were divided into two groups: group A (525 women, screened at fixed units) and group B (265 women, screened at MMUs). Key metrics included recall rates, biopsy rates, screen-detected BC rates, and refusal rates for follow-up evaluations. Statistical comparisons were made between the two groups to assess differences in outcomes.

Results: In group A (mean age 58.8 ± 5.7 years), the recall rate was 6.1%, with 32 recalls, 8 biopsies, and 7 confirmed BC cases, yielding a screen-detected BC rate of 1.33%. In group B (mean age 59.6 ± 5.8 years), the recall rate was higher at 10.6%, with 28 recalls, 5 biopsies, and 3 BC cases, resulting in a screen-detected BC rate of 1.13%. Notably, refusal rates for follow-up evaluations were significantly higher in group B (42.9%) compared to group A (9%).

Conclusion: While MMUs improve accessibility to underserved areas, they face challenges such as higher refusal rates for follow-up evaluations. The comparable screen-detected BC rates between MMUs and fixed units underscore the potential of combining both approaches in breast cancer screening programs. These findings highlight the importance of awareness campaigns to improve follow-up adherence and suggest that future research should focus on cost-effectiveness and sociocultural factors to optimize breast cancer prevention strategies.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

移动与固定乳房x线照相术的比较分析:乳腺癌筛查项目的表现和结果。
目的:乳腺癌筛查项目经常遇到与高成本和有限的可及性相关的挑战,特别是在农村地区。移动乳房x线照相术(MMUs)已成为解决这些障碍的潜在解决方案。本研究旨在比较固定单位和mmu进行乳房x线摄影筛查的结果,重点关注召回率、随访依从性和筛查发现的乳腺癌(BC)率。患者和方法:本回顾性研究分析了2023年1月至2月期间接受乳房x光检查的790名年龄在50-69岁之间的女性的数据。参与者分为两组:A组(525名女性,在固定单位进行筛查)和B组(265名女性,在mmu进行筛查)。关键指标包括召回率、活检率、筛查BC率和拒绝随访评估率。对两组患者进行统计学比较,以评估结果的差异。结果:A组患者平均年龄58.8±5.7岁,召回32例,活检8例,确诊BC 7例,筛查BC率1.33%。在B组(平均年龄59.6±5.8岁)中,召回率为10.6%,召回28例,活检5例,BC病例3例,筛查BC率为1.13%。值得注意的是,B组的随访评估拒绝率(42.9%)明显高于A组(9%)。结论:虽然mmu改善了服务不足地区的可及性,但它们面临着诸如后续评估拒签率较高等挑战。mmu和固定单元之间可比较的筛查检测BC率强调了将两种方法结合在乳腺癌筛查项目中的潜力。这些发现强调了宣传活动对提高随访依从性的重要性,并建议未来的研究应侧重于成本效益和社会文化因素,以优化乳腺癌预防策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信