Unravelling the decision making of foraging vultures: insights from a field experiment.

IF 2.9 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Royal Society Open Science Pub Date : 2025-04-16 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1098/rsos.250085
Eneko Arrondo, Jorge Carracedo, Patrick McAllister, Zebensui Morales-Reyes, Martina Scacco, Roberto Pascual-Rico, Ainara Cortés-Avizanda, Jose Antonio Donazar, Marcos Moleón, Jose Antonio Sánchez-Zapata
{"title":"Unravelling the decision making of foraging vultures: insights from a field experiment.","authors":"Eneko Arrondo, Jorge Carracedo, Patrick McAllister, Zebensui Morales-Reyes, Martina Scacco, Roberto Pascual-Rico, Ainara Cortés-Avizanda, Jose Antonio Donazar, Marcos Moleón, Jose Antonio Sánchez-Zapata","doi":"10.1098/rsos.250085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Optimal Foraging Theory (OFT) integrates both the consumer and the resource, yet their simultaneous assessment is uncommon. Vultures represent an ideal model for OFT studies because carrion requires no capture effort and minimal handling, allowing them to focus primarily on food searching. Here, we combined GPS tracking of 61 Iberian griffon vultures (consumers) with photo-trapping monitoring of 49 carcasses (resources) to assess the determinants of vulture foraging and the consequences for carrion consumption in two areas with different carrion abundances. First, we determined the importance of different factors (distance to the resource, hunger and competition) in the decisions of individuals of whether to descend or not on a carcass. Second, we compared carrion consumption patterns (time of carcass discovery and consumption, and maximum number of vultures gathered around the carcass) between areas. We found that distance, rather than hunger, is the primary factor determining whether a vulture descends to a carcass. In parallel, carrion was consumed similarly in areas with different resource availabilities. These findings indicate that vultures tend to eat whenever a nearby opportunity arises, consistent with a type-I functional response.</p>","PeriodicalId":21525,"journal":{"name":"Royal Society Open Science","volume":"12 4","pages":"250085"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12000686/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Royal Society Open Science","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.250085","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Optimal Foraging Theory (OFT) integrates both the consumer and the resource, yet their simultaneous assessment is uncommon. Vultures represent an ideal model for OFT studies because carrion requires no capture effort and minimal handling, allowing them to focus primarily on food searching. Here, we combined GPS tracking of 61 Iberian griffon vultures (consumers) with photo-trapping monitoring of 49 carcasses (resources) to assess the determinants of vulture foraging and the consequences for carrion consumption in two areas with different carrion abundances. First, we determined the importance of different factors (distance to the resource, hunger and competition) in the decisions of individuals of whether to descend or not on a carcass. Second, we compared carrion consumption patterns (time of carcass discovery and consumption, and maximum number of vultures gathered around the carcass) between areas. We found that distance, rather than hunger, is the primary factor determining whether a vulture descends to a carcass. In parallel, carrion was consumed similarly in areas with different resource availabilities. These findings indicate that vultures tend to eat whenever a nearby opportunity arises, consistent with a type-I functional response.

解开觅食秃鹫的决策:来自野外实验的见解。
最优觅食理论(OFT)整合了消费者和资源,但他们同时评估是罕见的。秃鹫代表了OFT研究的理想模型,因为腐肉不需要捕获努力和最小的处理,使它们主要专注于寻找食物。本研究通过对61只伊比利亚狮鹫(消费者)的GPS追踪和对49具腐肉(资源)的光电捕获监测相结合,评估了两个腐肉丰度不同地区秃鹫觅食的决定因素和腐肉消费的后果。首先,我们确定了不同因素(与资源的距离、饥饿和竞争)在个体决定是否降落在尸体上的重要性。其次,我们比较了不同地区的腐肉消费模式(腐肉发现和消费的时间,以及腐肉周围聚集的秃鹫的最大数量)。我们发现,距离,而不是饥饿,是决定秃鹫是否会降落到尸体上的主要因素。与此同时,腐肉在不同资源可用性的地区也会被消耗。这些发现表明,秃鹫倾向于在附近机会出现时进食,这与i型功能反应相一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Royal Society Open Science
Royal Society Open Science Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
508
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Royal Society Open Science is a new open journal publishing high-quality original research across the entire range of science on the basis of objective peer-review. The journal covers the entire range of science and mathematics and will allow the Society to publish all the high-quality work it receives without the usual restrictions on scope, length or impact.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信