Safety and Efficacy of Aneurysms Treated with Endovascular Devices (SEATED).

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Ahmed R Bassiouny, Anand Sastry, Alex Mortimer, Jeremy Lynch, Hemant Sonwalkar, Aaron Bleakley, Ahmed Iqbal, Ana Paula Narata, Tufail Patankar, Islim Fathallah, Naga Kandasamy, Parthiban Balasundaram, Sara Sciacca, Juveria Siddiqui, Thomas C Booth
{"title":"Safety and Efficacy of Aneurysms Treated with Endovascular Devices (SEATED).","authors":"Ahmed R Bassiouny, Anand Sastry, Alex Mortimer, Jeremy Lynch, Hemant Sonwalkar, Aaron Bleakley, Ahmed Iqbal, Ana Paula Narata, Tufail Patankar, Islim Fathallah, Naga Kandasamy, Parthiban Balasundaram, Sara Sciacca, Juveria Siddiqui, Thomas C Booth","doi":"10.1093/bjr/tqaf094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To create a nationwide consortium to gather all the data related to advanced devices used for aneurysm treatment and conduct pragmatic real-world studies despite the variations amongst all centres. The strength of this study will be in pooling data of the less commonly used recent devices where there is less evidence. The study will be prospective and retrospective where the initial recruitment figure is expected to be around 5000 patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To assess how endovascular techniques vary among different UK centres we illustrate the results of initial surveys that were sent to those centres across the UK using a single device, the pipeline embolization device with vantage technology (PEDV).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although the centres were using the same device, the antiplatelet protocol varied from one centre to another as well as follow-up protocols according to the local experience, patient clinical status or even according to the adjuncts uses (e.g., adjunct coiling).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The illustrated results show that although the centres were using the same device, the antiplatelet protocol varied from one centre to another. Also, follow-up protocols vary from one centre to another according to the local experience, patient clinical status or even according to the adjuncts used (e.g. adjunct coiling). This exemplar serves to illustrate that a nationwide consortium can pool and analyse data of any recent endovascular device.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>Obtaining nationwide data regarding safety, efficacy as well as risk factors for aneurysm recurrence when using recent devices. This study will add valuable data regarding the less commonly used recent devices where there is less evidence.\\.</p>","PeriodicalId":9306,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqaf094","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To create a nationwide consortium to gather all the data related to advanced devices used for aneurysm treatment and conduct pragmatic real-world studies despite the variations amongst all centres. The strength of this study will be in pooling data of the less commonly used recent devices where there is less evidence. The study will be prospective and retrospective where the initial recruitment figure is expected to be around 5000 patients.

Methods: To assess how endovascular techniques vary among different UK centres we illustrate the results of initial surveys that were sent to those centres across the UK using a single device, the pipeline embolization device with vantage technology (PEDV).

Results: Although the centres were using the same device, the antiplatelet protocol varied from one centre to another as well as follow-up protocols according to the local experience, patient clinical status or even according to the adjuncts uses (e.g., adjunct coiling).

Conclusions: The illustrated results show that although the centres were using the same device, the antiplatelet protocol varied from one centre to another. Also, follow-up protocols vary from one centre to another according to the local experience, patient clinical status or even according to the adjuncts used (e.g. adjunct coiling). This exemplar serves to illustrate that a nationwide consortium can pool and analyse data of any recent endovascular device.

Advances in knowledge: Obtaining nationwide data regarding safety, efficacy as well as risk factors for aneurysm recurrence when using recent devices. This study will add valuable data regarding the less commonly used recent devices where there is less evidence.\.

血管内装置治疗动脉瘤的安全性和有效性。
目的:建立一个全国性的联盟,收集所有用于动脉瘤治疗的先进设备的相关数据,并进行实用的现实世界研究,尽管各中心之间存在差异。这项研究的优势在于汇集了最近不太常用的设备的数据,这些设备的证据较少。该研究将是前瞻性和回顾性的,最初的招募数字预计约为5000名患者。方法:为了评估血管内技术在不同的英国中心之间的差异,我们说明了使用单一设备发送到英国各地中心的初步调查结果,即优势技术管道栓塞装置(PEDV)。结果:虽然各中心使用相同的设备,但各中心的抗血小板方案不同,随访方案也因当地经验、患者临床状况甚至辅助使用(如辅助盘绕)而异。结论:图示结果表明,虽然中心使用相同的设备,抗血小板方案从一个中心到另一个不同。此外,根据当地经验、患者临床状况,甚至根据所使用的辅助装置(如辅助线圈),每个中心的随访方案也各不相同。这个例子说明,一个全国性的联盟可以汇集和分析任何最近的血管内装置的数据。知识的进步:获得全国范围内关于使用最新设备时动脉瘤复发的安全性、有效性和危险因素的数据。这项研究将为最近不太常用的设备提供有价值的数据,但证据较少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Radiology
British Journal of Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
330
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: BJR is the international research journal of the British Institute of Radiology and is the oldest scientific journal in the field of radiology and related sciences. Dating back to 1896, BJR’s history is radiology’s history, and the journal has featured some landmark papers such as the first description of Computed Tomography "Computerized transverse axial tomography" by Godfrey Hounsfield in 1973. A valuable historical resource, the complete BJR archive has been digitized from 1896. Quick Facts: - 2015 Impact Factor – 1.840 - Receipt to first decision – average of 6 weeks - Acceptance to online publication – average of 3 weeks - ISSN: 0007-1285 - eISSN: 1748-880X Open Access option
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信