Ahmed R Bassiouny, Anand Sastry, Alex Mortimer, Jeremy Lynch, Hemant Sonwalkar, Aaron Bleakley, Ahmed Iqbal, Ana Paula Narata, Tufail Patankar, Islim Fathallah, Naga Kandasamy, Parthiban Balasundaram, Sara Sciacca, Juveria Siddiqui, Thomas C Booth
{"title":"Safety and Efficacy of Aneurysms Treated with Endovascular Devices (SEATED).","authors":"Ahmed R Bassiouny, Anand Sastry, Alex Mortimer, Jeremy Lynch, Hemant Sonwalkar, Aaron Bleakley, Ahmed Iqbal, Ana Paula Narata, Tufail Patankar, Islim Fathallah, Naga Kandasamy, Parthiban Balasundaram, Sara Sciacca, Juveria Siddiqui, Thomas C Booth","doi":"10.1093/bjr/tqaf094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To create a nationwide consortium to gather all the data related to advanced devices used for aneurysm treatment and conduct pragmatic real-world studies despite the variations amongst all centres. The strength of this study will be in pooling data of the less commonly used recent devices where there is less evidence. The study will be prospective and retrospective where the initial recruitment figure is expected to be around 5000 patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To assess how endovascular techniques vary among different UK centres we illustrate the results of initial surveys that were sent to those centres across the UK using a single device, the pipeline embolization device with vantage technology (PEDV).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although the centres were using the same device, the antiplatelet protocol varied from one centre to another as well as follow-up protocols according to the local experience, patient clinical status or even according to the adjuncts uses (e.g., adjunct coiling).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The illustrated results show that although the centres were using the same device, the antiplatelet protocol varied from one centre to another. Also, follow-up protocols vary from one centre to another according to the local experience, patient clinical status or even according to the adjuncts used (e.g. adjunct coiling). This exemplar serves to illustrate that a nationwide consortium can pool and analyse data of any recent endovascular device.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>Obtaining nationwide data regarding safety, efficacy as well as risk factors for aneurysm recurrence when using recent devices. This study will add valuable data regarding the less commonly used recent devices where there is less evidence.\\.</p>","PeriodicalId":9306,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqaf094","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To create a nationwide consortium to gather all the data related to advanced devices used for aneurysm treatment and conduct pragmatic real-world studies despite the variations amongst all centres. The strength of this study will be in pooling data of the less commonly used recent devices where there is less evidence. The study will be prospective and retrospective where the initial recruitment figure is expected to be around 5000 patients.
Methods: To assess how endovascular techniques vary among different UK centres we illustrate the results of initial surveys that were sent to those centres across the UK using a single device, the pipeline embolization device with vantage technology (PEDV).
Results: Although the centres were using the same device, the antiplatelet protocol varied from one centre to another as well as follow-up protocols according to the local experience, patient clinical status or even according to the adjuncts uses (e.g., adjunct coiling).
Conclusions: The illustrated results show that although the centres were using the same device, the antiplatelet protocol varied from one centre to another. Also, follow-up protocols vary from one centre to another according to the local experience, patient clinical status or even according to the adjuncts used (e.g. adjunct coiling). This exemplar serves to illustrate that a nationwide consortium can pool and analyse data of any recent endovascular device.
Advances in knowledge: Obtaining nationwide data regarding safety, efficacy as well as risk factors for aneurysm recurrence when using recent devices. This study will add valuable data regarding the less commonly used recent devices where there is less evidence.\.
期刊介绍:
BJR is the international research journal of the British Institute of Radiology and is the oldest scientific journal in the field of radiology and related sciences.
Dating back to 1896, BJR’s history is radiology’s history, and the journal has featured some landmark papers such as the first description of Computed Tomography "Computerized transverse axial tomography" by Godfrey Hounsfield in 1973. A valuable historical resource, the complete BJR archive has been digitized from 1896.
Quick Facts:
- 2015 Impact Factor – 1.840
- Receipt to first decision – average of 6 weeks
- Acceptance to online publication – average of 3 weeks
- ISSN: 0007-1285
- eISSN: 1748-880X
Open Access option