Self-Administered Taste Testing Without Water: Normative Data for the 53-Item Waterless Empirical Taste Test (WETT®).

IF 7.2 2区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Richard L Doty, Ryan Sharetts, Shima T Moein
{"title":"Self-Administered Taste Testing Without Water: Normative Data for the 53-Item Waterless Empirical Taste Test (WETT<sup>®</sup>).","authors":"Richard L Doty, Ryan Sharetts, Shima T Moein","doi":"10.1002/alr.23587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>According to the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), more than 20 million Americans suffer from chronic taste problems. Unfortunately, quantitative testing is rarely performed, self-reports are inaccurate, and \"taste\" is often confused with olfaction-dependent flavors. Clearly, a reliable, practical, and norm-based clinical taste test is sorely needed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The recently developed 53-item Waterless Empirical Taste Test (WETT<sup>®</sup>) was self-administered by 1392 healthy subjects (493 men and 899 women) spanning the ages of 10-94. Normative percentile ranks were developed, and the influences of sex, age, COVID-19 infection history, and smoking behavior were evaluated using general linear models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On average, WETT<sup>®</sup> scores declined with age beginning in the 30s and were lower in men than in women (ps < 0.0001), with the sex difference most apparent between 40 and 70 years of age. Subtest scores for the five basic taste qualities followed similar age- and sex-related patterns. No influences of COVID-19 history were evident. Smokers had lower salty (NaCl) and bitter (caffeine) WETT<sup>®</sup> scores than nonsmokers. The developed normative tables make it possible to determine a patient's absolute dysfunction score as well as a relative score based on age- and sex-related percentiles.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides normative data based on 1392 healthy subjects for interpreting a patient's performance on a reliable self-administered taste test that requires no liquid stimuli or rinses. Its findings support the view that both sex and age are significant determinants of taste function in the general population.</p>","PeriodicalId":13716,"journal":{"name":"International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology","volume":" ","pages":"e23587"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.23587","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: According to the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), more than 20 million Americans suffer from chronic taste problems. Unfortunately, quantitative testing is rarely performed, self-reports are inaccurate, and "taste" is often confused with olfaction-dependent flavors. Clearly, a reliable, practical, and norm-based clinical taste test is sorely needed.

Methods: The recently developed 53-item Waterless Empirical Taste Test (WETT®) was self-administered by 1392 healthy subjects (493 men and 899 women) spanning the ages of 10-94. Normative percentile ranks were developed, and the influences of sex, age, COVID-19 infection history, and smoking behavior were evaluated using general linear models.

Results: On average, WETT® scores declined with age beginning in the 30s and were lower in men than in women (ps < 0.0001), with the sex difference most apparent between 40 and 70 years of age. Subtest scores for the five basic taste qualities followed similar age- and sex-related patterns. No influences of COVID-19 history were evident. Smokers had lower salty (NaCl) and bitter (caffeine) WETT® scores than nonsmokers. The developed normative tables make it possible to determine a patient's absolute dysfunction score as well as a relative score based on age- and sex-related percentiles.

Conclusion: This study provides normative data based on 1392 healthy subjects for interpreting a patient's performance on a reliable self-administered taste test that requires no liquid stimuli or rinses. Its findings support the view that both sex and age are significant determinants of taste function in the general population.

无水自我味觉测试:53项无水经验味觉测试(WETT®)的规范性数据。
背景:根据国家健康和营养检查调查(NHANES),超过2000万美国人患有慢性味觉问题。不幸的是,定量测试很少进行,自我报告是不准确的,而且“味道”经常与依赖嗅觉的味道混淆。显然,一个可靠的,实用的,基于规范的临床口味测试是迫切需要的。方法:采用新开发的53项无水经验味觉测试(WETT®),对年龄在10 ~ 94岁的1392名健康受试者(男性493人,女性899人)进行自我测试。建立规范的百分位等级,并使用一般线性模型评估性别、年龄、COVID-19感染史和吸烟行为的影响。结果:平均而言,WETT®评分从30岁开始随着年龄的增长而下降,男性低于女性(ps < 0.0001),性别差异在40至70岁之间最为明显。五种基本味觉品质的子测试得分也遵循着与年龄和性别相关的模式。COVID-19病史无明显影响。吸烟者的盐(NaCl)和苦(咖啡因)WETT®评分低于不吸烟者。开发的规范表使得确定患者的绝对功能障碍评分以及基于年龄和性别相关百分位数的相对评分成为可能。结论:本研究提供了基于1392名健康受试者的规范性数据,用于解释患者在不需要液体刺激或冲洗的可靠自我管理的味觉测试中的表现。研究结果支持了性别和年龄是普通人群味觉功能的重要决定因素的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
10.90%
发文量
185
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Forum of Allergy & Rhinologyis a peer-reviewed scientific journal, and the Official Journal of the American Rhinologic Society and the American Academy of Otolaryngic Allergy. International Forum of Allergy Rhinology provides a forum for clinical researchers, basic scientists, clinicians, and others to publish original research and explore controversies in the medical and surgical treatment of patients with otolaryngic allergy, rhinologic, and skull base conditions. The application of current research to the management of otolaryngic allergy, rhinologic, and skull base diseases and the need for further investigation will be highlighted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信