Unveiling the latest evidence: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis and GRADE assessment on the effectiveness of acupressure in managing labor pain.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Mona Larki, Leila Karimi, Shayesteh Jahanfar, Solmaz Mohammadi, Somayeh Makvandi
{"title":"Unveiling the latest evidence: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis and GRADE assessment on the effectiveness of acupressure in managing labor pain.","authors":"Mona Larki, Leila Karimi, Shayesteh Jahanfar, Solmaz Mohammadi, Somayeh Makvandi","doi":"10.1186/s12906-025-04908-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Labor pain is a significant challenge during childbirth, highlighting the necessity for effective pain management strategies. Acupressure has been recognized as a non-pharmacological method; however, its efficacy requires comprehensive evaluation. This updated systematic review and meta-analysis seeks to consolidate the most recent evidence regarding the effectiveness of Acupressure in alleviating labor pain and to evaluate the quality of this evidence using the GRADE framework.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An updated systematic review was conducted by querying multiple databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the impact of Acupressure on labor pain. Studies were included based on predefined eligibility criteria. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias method for randomized trials (RoB). Meta-analyses were performed to determine the overall effect size, and the GRADE approach was applied to assess the certainty of the evidence. Meta-analyses of all the data were done using RevMan 5.4.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 37 studies met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis revealed that Acupressure significantly reduces labor pain compared to touch (MD = -1.19, 95% CI -1.66 to -0.72, p < 0.00001), Sham (MD = -1.41, 95% CI -2.55 to -0.27, p = 0.01), and no intervention group (MD = -2.32, 95% CI -2.87 to -1.76, p < 0.00001). Although both SP6 and LI4 Acupressure points reduced pain, SP6 had more of an impact compared to previous reviews. The funnel plot comparing the effect of Acupressure with a touch on labor pain intensity suggested a possible publication bias. The GRADE assessment indicated a moderate to low level of certainty regarding these results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Acupressure seems to be a viable method for alleviating labor pain, supported by moderate to low-quality evidence. Additionally, it is advisable to conduct well-designed RCTs to enhance the validity of these findings and investigate the underlying mechanisms that contribute to the effectiveness of Acupressure in this setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":9128,"journal":{"name":"BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies","volume":"25 1","pages":"170"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12065293/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-025-04908-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Labor pain is a significant challenge during childbirth, highlighting the necessity for effective pain management strategies. Acupressure has been recognized as a non-pharmacological method; however, its efficacy requires comprehensive evaluation. This updated systematic review and meta-analysis seeks to consolidate the most recent evidence regarding the effectiveness of Acupressure in alleviating labor pain and to evaluate the quality of this evidence using the GRADE framework.

Methods: An updated systematic review was conducted by querying multiple databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the impact of Acupressure on labor pain. Studies were included based on predefined eligibility criteria. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias method for randomized trials (RoB). Meta-analyses were performed to determine the overall effect size, and the GRADE approach was applied to assess the certainty of the evidence. Meta-analyses of all the data were done using RevMan 5.4.

Results: A total of 37 studies met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis revealed that Acupressure significantly reduces labor pain compared to touch (MD = -1.19, 95% CI -1.66 to -0.72, p < 0.00001), Sham (MD = -1.41, 95% CI -2.55 to -0.27, p = 0.01), and no intervention group (MD = -2.32, 95% CI -2.87 to -1.76, p < 0.00001). Although both SP6 and LI4 Acupressure points reduced pain, SP6 had more of an impact compared to previous reviews. The funnel plot comparing the effect of Acupressure with a touch on labor pain intensity suggested a possible publication bias. The GRADE assessment indicated a moderate to low level of certainty regarding these results.

Conclusions: Acupressure seems to be a viable method for alleviating labor pain, supported by moderate to low-quality evidence. Additionally, it is advisable to conduct well-designed RCTs to enhance the validity of these findings and investigate the underlying mechanisms that contribute to the effectiveness of Acupressure in this setting.

揭示最新的证据:一个更新的系统回顾和荟萃分析和等级评估的有效性穴位按压在管理分娩疼痛。
背景:阵痛是分娩过程中的一个重大挑战,强调了有效的疼痛管理策略的必要性。穴位按压已被公认为一种非药物方法;但其疗效需要综合评价。这一更新的系统回顾和荟萃分析旨在巩固关于穴位按压在减轻分娩疼痛方面的有效性的最新证据,并使用GRADE框架评估这些证据的质量。方法:通过查询多个数据库的随机对照试验(rct),对穴位按压对分娩疼痛的影响进行了更新的系统回顾。研究是根据预先确定的资格标准纳入的。采用Cochrane随机试验风险偏倚法(RoB)评估偏倚风险。进行meta分析以确定总体效应大小,并采用GRADE方法评估证据的确定性。使用RevMan 5.4对所有数据进行meta分析。结果:共有37项研究符合纳入标准。荟萃分析显示,与触摸组(MD = -1.19, 95% CI -1.66 ~ -0.72, p < 0.00001)、假手术组(MD = -1.41, 95% CI -2.55 ~ -0.27, p = 0.01)和无干预组(MD = -2.32, 95% CI -2.87 ~ -1.76, p < 0.00001)相比,穴位按压可显著减轻分娩疼痛。虽然SP6和LI4穴位都能减轻疼痛,但与之前的研究相比,SP6的影响更大。比较穴位按压和触摸对分娩疼痛强度影响的漏斗图显示可能存在发表偏倚。GRADE评估表明这些结果的确定性为中等到低水平。结论:穴位按压似乎是一种可行的减轻分娩疼痛的方法,有中低质量的证据支持。此外,建议进行精心设计的随机对照试验,以提高这些发现的有效性,并调查在这种情况下导致指压疗法有效性的潜在机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.60%
发文量
300
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信