Adrian Militaru, Catalin Andrei Bulai, Cosmin Victor Ene, Razvan Ionut Popescu, Cristian Mares, Stefan Marian Balacescu, Razvan Dragos Multescu, Dragos Adrian Georgescu, Petrisor Aurelian Geavlete, Bogdan Florin Geavlete
{"title":"Changes in Ureteral Stone Treatment During COVID-19: A Single-Center Emergency Department Study.","authors":"Adrian Militaru, Catalin Andrei Bulai, Cosmin Victor Ene, Razvan Ionut Popescu, Cristian Mares, Stefan Marian Balacescu, Razvan Dragos Multescu, Dragos Adrian Georgescu, Petrisor Aurelian Geavlete, Bogdan Florin Geavlete","doi":"10.2147/RRU.S518331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We evaluated the hospitalization rate, length of stay, and management of patients with ureteric lithiasis admitted under emergency conditions at a single institution during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted on 219 patients with ureteral lithiasis, divided into pre-COVID-19 (1.10.2019-29.02.2020) and COVID-19 groups (1.10.2020-29.02.2021). The study examined patient and stone characteristics, hospitalization duration, surgical interventions, creatinine levels, and associated urinary tract infections. It also evaluated the complications related to delayed treatment during the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study found a 73.41% reduction in admissions for obstructive ureteral lithiasis during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to the pre-pandemic period. Notable differences were observed in age (61.5 vs 46 years, p=0.000), gender (p=0.046), stone laterality (p=0.024), location (p=0.002), serum creatinine levels (1.59 vs 1.09 mg/dL, p=0.000), and urine cultures (45.65% vs 23.12%, p=0.002). During the pandemic period, the rate of primary stone extraction procedures decreased (32.6% vs 59%, p<0.001), while operative time (52.89 vs 39.84 minutes, p<0.001) and hospital stay significantly increased (13.09 vs 3.76 days, p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The pandemic resulted in fewer hospitalizations for ureteral lithiasis and an increase in complications, likely due to reduced access to medical care and a greater tendency for upper urinary tract drainage.</p>","PeriodicalId":21008,"journal":{"name":"Research and Reports in Urology","volume":"17 ","pages":"129-138"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12036590/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Reports in Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S518331","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: We evaluated the hospitalization rate, length of stay, and management of patients with ureteric lithiasis admitted under emergency conditions at a single institution during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Patients and methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 219 patients with ureteral lithiasis, divided into pre-COVID-19 (1.10.2019-29.02.2020) and COVID-19 groups (1.10.2020-29.02.2021). The study examined patient and stone characteristics, hospitalization duration, surgical interventions, creatinine levels, and associated urinary tract infections. It also evaluated the complications related to delayed treatment during the pandemic.
Results: The study found a 73.41% reduction in admissions for obstructive ureteral lithiasis during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to the pre-pandemic period. Notable differences were observed in age (61.5 vs 46 years, p=0.000), gender (p=0.046), stone laterality (p=0.024), location (p=0.002), serum creatinine levels (1.59 vs 1.09 mg/dL, p=0.000), and urine cultures (45.65% vs 23.12%, p=0.002). During the pandemic period, the rate of primary stone extraction procedures decreased (32.6% vs 59%, p<0.001), while operative time (52.89 vs 39.84 minutes, p<0.001) and hospital stay significantly increased (13.09 vs 3.76 days, p<0.001).
Conclusion: The pandemic resulted in fewer hospitalizations for ureteral lithiasis and an increase in complications, likely due to reduced access to medical care and a greater tendency for upper urinary tract drainage.
目的:我们评估在COVID-19大流行期间在一家机构急诊收治的输尿管结石患者的住院率、住院时间和管理。患者与方法:对219例输尿管结石患者进行回顾性研究,分为COVID-19前期(1.10.2019-29.02.2020)组和COVID-19组(1.10.2020-29.02.2021)。该研究检查了患者和结石特征、住院时间、手术干预、肌酐水平和相关的尿路感染。它还评估了大流行期间与延迟治疗有关的并发症。结果:研究发现,与大流行前相比,COVID-19大流行期间输尿管梗阻性结石入院率下降了73.41%。在年龄(61.5 vs 46岁,p=0.000)、性别(p=0.046)、结石侧边性(p=0.024)、位置(p=0.002)、血清肌酐水平(1.59 vs 1.09 mg/dL, p=0.000)和尿培养(45.65% vs 23.12%, p=0.002)方面观察到显著差异。大流行期间,原发性结石取出手术的比例下降(32.6%对59%)。结论:大流行导致输尿管结石住院人数减少,并发症增加,可能是由于获得医疗服务的机会减少和上尿路引流的趋势增加。
期刊介绍:
Research and Reports in Urology is an international, peer-reviewed, open access, online journal. Publishing original research, reports, editorials, reviews and commentaries on all aspects of adult and pediatric urology in the clinic and laboratory including the following topics: Pathology, pathophysiology of urological disease Investigation and treatment of urological disease Pharmacology of drugs used for the treatment of urological disease Although the main focus of the journal is to publish research and clinical results in humans; preclinical, animal and in vitro studies will be published where they will shed light on disease processes and potential new therapies. Issues of patient safety and quality of care will also be considered.