Exploring disparities in the proportion of ultra-processed foods and beverages purchased in grocery stores by US households in 2020.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Elizabeth K Dunford, Donna R Miles, Barry M Popkin
{"title":"Exploring disparities in the proportion of ultra-processed foods and beverages purchased in grocery stores by US households in 2020.","authors":"Elizabeth K Dunford, Donna R Miles, Barry M Popkin","doi":"10.1017/S1368980025000606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>American diets are increasingly based on ultra-processed foods (UPF). Current research, particularly on socio-economic differentials, is lacking. This study aimed to provide an updated examination of US household purchases of UPF and how this differs by race-ethnicity, household income and household education.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The NielsenIQ Consumer Panel 2020 was utilised for analysis. Each food and beverage product purchased by US households was assigned a level of processing under the Nova level of processing classification system. The volume of UPF purchased overall and by food group was determined for each Nova processing group and examined by race-ethnicity, education and income. Results were stratified by race-ethnicity within each income group. A <i>P</i> value < 0·0001 was considered significant.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>This study analysed data from the Nielsen IQ Consumer Panel 2020 which recorded household food purchases in the USA.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>The Nielsen IQ Homescan Consumer Panel is a nationally representative longitudinal survey of around 35 000 and 60 000 US households.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 33 054 687 products purchased by 59 939 US households in 2020, 48 % of foods and 38 % of beverages were considered UPF. Categories with the highest proportion of purchases deriving from UPF included carbonated soft drinks (90 %), mixed dishes and soups (81 %) and sweets and snacks (71 %). Slightly higher but statistically significant proportions of UPF purchases occurred in the lowest income and education groups and among non-Hispanic whites.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It is concerning that household purchases of UPF in the USA are high. Policies that reduce consumption of UPF may help reduce diet-related health inequalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":20951,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":"e85"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12100555/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980025000606","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: American diets are increasingly based on ultra-processed foods (UPF). Current research, particularly on socio-economic differentials, is lacking. This study aimed to provide an updated examination of US household purchases of UPF and how this differs by race-ethnicity, household income and household education.

Design: The NielsenIQ Consumer Panel 2020 was utilised for analysis. Each food and beverage product purchased by US households was assigned a level of processing under the Nova level of processing classification system. The volume of UPF purchased overall and by food group was determined for each Nova processing group and examined by race-ethnicity, education and income. Results were stratified by race-ethnicity within each income group. A P value < 0·0001 was considered significant.

Setting: This study analysed data from the Nielsen IQ Consumer Panel 2020 which recorded household food purchases in the USA.

Participants: The Nielsen IQ Homescan Consumer Panel is a nationally representative longitudinal survey of around 35 000 and 60 000 US households.

Results: Of 33 054 687 products purchased by 59 939 US households in 2020, 48 % of foods and 38 % of beverages were considered UPF. Categories with the highest proportion of purchases deriving from UPF included carbonated soft drinks (90 %), mixed dishes and soups (81 %) and sweets and snacks (71 %). Slightly higher but statistically significant proportions of UPF purchases occurred in the lowest income and education groups and among non-Hispanic whites.

Conclusions: It is concerning that household purchases of UPF in the USA are high. Policies that reduce consumption of UPF may help reduce diet-related health inequalities.

探索2020年美国家庭在杂货店购买超加工食品和饮料比例的差异。
目的:美国人的饮食越来越多地基于超加工食品(upf)。目前缺乏关于社会经济差异的研究。本研究旨在提供美国家庭购买upf的最新检查,以及种族,家庭收入和家庭教育的差异。设计:采用NielsenIQ Consumer Panel 2020进行分析。美国家庭购买的每一种食品和饮料产品在Nova等级加工分类系统下被分配了一个加工等级。确定每个Nova加工组的upf总体购买量和按食品组购买量,并按种族、民族、教育和收入进行检查。结果在每个收入群体中按种族分层。A P值< 0.0001被认为是显著的。背景:本研究分析了尼尔森智商消费者小组2020年的数据,该小组记录了美国家庭食品购买情况。Nielsen IQ Homescan消费者小组是一项具有全国代表性的纵向调查,涉及约35,000至60,000个美国家庭。结果:在2020年59,939个美国家庭购买的33,054,687种产品中,48%的食品和38%的饮料被认为是upf。使用统一消费计划购买的物品比例最高的类别包括碳酸软饮料(90%)、混合菜肴和汤(81%)以及糖果和零食(71%)。在最低收入和受教育程度的群体以及非西班牙裔白人中,UPF购买比例略高,但在统计上具有重要意义。结论:令人担忧的是,美国家庭upf的购买量很高。减少普遍健康食品消费的政策可能有助于减少与饮食有关的健康不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Public Health Nutrition
Public Health Nutrition 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
521
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Public Health Nutrition provides an international peer-reviewed forum for the publication and dissemination of research and scholarship aimed at understanding the causes of, and approaches and solutions to nutrition-related public health achievements, situations and problems around the world. The journal publishes original and commissioned articles, commentaries and discussion papers for debate. The journal is of interest to epidemiologists and health promotion specialists interested in the role of nutrition in disease prevention; academics and those involved in fieldwork and the application of research to identify practical solutions to important public health problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信