Determinants of cancer care pathways at Wajir County, Kenya: patient perspectives.

IF 1.3 Q4 ONCOLOGY
ecancermedicalscience Pub Date : 2025-02-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3332/ecancer.2025.1841
Fatuma Affey, Dabo Galgalo Halake, Grace Muira Wainaina, Hussein Ali Osman, James G Ndukui, Houda Abdourahman, Omar Abdihamid
{"title":"Determinants of cancer care pathways at Wajir County, Kenya: patient perspectives.","authors":"Fatuma Affey, Dabo Galgalo Halake, Grace Muira Wainaina, Hussein Ali Osman, James G Ndukui, Houda Abdourahman, Omar Abdihamid","doi":"10.3332/ecancer.2025.1841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cancer represents a major public health issue with substantial morbidity and mortality in low-resource settings such as Kenya. This study focuses on Wajir County in northern Kenya, a region with limited cancer care infrastructure and high unmet needs. Despite recent efforts to decentralize cancer care in Kenya, including establishing regional cancer centres in Garissa, Nakuru, and Mombasa, access to screening, diagnostics, and treatment remains constrained, particularly in rural areas. The absence of comprehensive cancer care pathways and a specialized oncology workforce in Wajir County exacerbates challenges in early detection, treatment, and palliative care. The study evaluated the availability of cancer care services at Wajir County Referral Hospital (WCRH), including screening, diagnostic services, treatment modalities, and referral systems. The study further explores the gaps in cancer care, focusing on patient perspectives, and proposes potential solutions to address these challenges.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used mixed-methods (qualitative and quantitative) methods to understand cancer care from the perspective of patients at WCRH. It involved adult patients (over 18) with a confirmed cancer diagnosis who were receiving treatment or follow-up care between February and April 2024. Data were gathered through interviews and surveys, with research assistants helping with language translation and community navigation. The study collected information on demographics, cancer types, and prevalence rates, which were analysed using descriptive statistics. The qualitative data focused on patients' experiences with cancer awareness, treatment, and care gaps, and were analysed for common themes. Ethical approval was obtained, and informed consent was given by all participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study involved 25 cancer patients (12 males, 13 females) receiving treatment at WCRH. The most common cancers were esophageal (44%), cervical (28%), breast (24%), and prostate (8%). Delays in diagnosis were significant, with 12% of patients waiting over 6 years, 24% waiting 4-6 years, and 40% waiting 1-3 years before seeking care. Most diagnoses were made at WCRH (64%), with others diagnosed at the Garissa Cancer Centre (22%) or in Nairobi (20%). Diagnostic tools available at WCRH included pap smears, mammograms, PSA tests, ultrasound, CT scans, and biopsies. However, access to these tools was limited, with barium swallow (32%) being the most frequently used for esophageal cancer, followed by pap smears, biopsies, and ultrasound (16% each). Patient awareness of cancer screening was higher for cervical (68%) and breast cancer (60%) but lower for prostate cancer (32%) and esophageal cancer (4%). Despite awareness, only 8% had previously undergone screening. Regarding treatment, most patients (80%) were aware of surgical options, while fewer knew about chemotherapy (28%) or palliative care (12%). When treatment was unavailable at WCRH, most patients preferred the Garissa Cancer Centre (80%) or Nairobi (52%). Financial challenges were the primary barrier to treatment for 88% of patients, and patients suggested improving local cancer care, subsidizing treatment, and enhancing early detection and screening services.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings indicate a high burden of late-stage cancer diagnoses, insufficient cancer screening and treatment services, and limited access to cancer care pathways and patient navigation systems. These results underscore the urgent need for improved cancer care pathways, enhanced awareness, and increased healthcare capacity to reduce cancer morbidity and mortality in northern Kenya. This study contributes to understanding the cancer care landscape in Wajir County and provides a foundation for future health policy initiatives aimed at bridging existing gaps in cancer care.</p>","PeriodicalId":11460,"journal":{"name":"ecancermedicalscience","volume":"19 ","pages":"1841"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12003981/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ecancermedicalscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2025.1841","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cancer represents a major public health issue with substantial morbidity and mortality in low-resource settings such as Kenya. This study focuses on Wajir County in northern Kenya, a region with limited cancer care infrastructure and high unmet needs. Despite recent efforts to decentralize cancer care in Kenya, including establishing regional cancer centres in Garissa, Nakuru, and Mombasa, access to screening, diagnostics, and treatment remains constrained, particularly in rural areas. The absence of comprehensive cancer care pathways and a specialized oncology workforce in Wajir County exacerbates challenges in early detection, treatment, and palliative care. The study evaluated the availability of cancer care services at Wajir County Referral Hospital (WCRH), including screening, diagnostic services, treatment modalities, and referral systems. The study further explores the gaps in cancer care, focusing on patient perspectives, and proposes potential solutions to address these challenges.

Methods: This study used mixed-methods (qualitative and quantitative) methods to understand cancer care from the perspective of patients at WCRH. It involved adult patients (over 18) with a confirmed cancer diagnosis who were receiving treatment or follow-up care between February and April 2024. Data were gathered through interviews and surveys, with research assistants helping with language translation and community navigation. The study collected information on demographics, cancer types, and prevalence rates, which were analysed using descriptive statistics. The qualitative data focused on patients' experiences with cancer awareness, treatment, and care gaps, and were analysed for common themes. Ethical approval was obtained, and informed consent was given by all participants.

Results: This study involved 25 cancer patients (12 males, 13 females) receiving treatment at WCRH. The most common cancers were esophageal (44%), cervical (28%), breast (24%), and prostate (8%). Delays in diagnosis were significant, with 12% of patients waiting over 6 years, 24% waiting 4-6 years, and 40% waiting 1-3 years before seeking care. Most diagnoses were made at WCRH (64%), with others diagnosed at the Garissa Cancer Centre (22%) or in Nairobi (20%). Diagnostic tools available at WCRH included pap smears, mammograms, PSA tests, ultrasound, CT scans, and biopsies. However, access to these tools was limited, with barium swallow (32%) being the most frequently used for esophageal cancer, followed by pap smears, biopsies, and ultrasound (16% each). Patient awareness of cancer screening was higher for cervical (68%) and breast cancer (60%) but lower for prostate cancer (32%) and esophageal cancer (4%). Despite awareness, only 8% had previously undergone screening. Regarding treatment, most patients (80%) were aware of surgical options, while fewer knew about chemotherapy (28%) or palliative care (12%). When treatment was unavailable at WCRH, most patients preferred the Garissa Cancer Centre (80%) or Nairobi (52%). Financial challenges were the primary barrier to treatment for 88% of patients, and patients suggested improving local cancer care, subsidizing treatment, and enhancing early detection and screening services.

Conclusion: The findings indicate a high burden of late-stage cancer diagnoses, insufficient cancer screening and treatment services, and limited access to cancer care pathways and patient navigation systems. These results underscore the urgent need for improved cancer care pathways, enhanced awareness, and increased healthcare capacity to reduce cancer morbidity and mortality in northern Kenya. This study contributes to understanding the cancer care landscape in Wajir County and provides a foundation for future health policy initiatives aimed at bridging existing gaps in cancer care.

肯尼亚Wajir县癌症治疗途径的决定因素:患者观点。
背景:癌症是一个重大的公共卫生问题,在肯尼亚等资源匮乏的国家发病率和死亡率都很高。本研究的重点是肯尼亚北部的瓦吉尔县,该地区癌症护理基础设施有限,未满足的需求很高。尽管肯尼亚最近努力分散癌症治疗,包括在加里萨、纳库鲁和蒙巴萨建立区域癌症中心,但获得筛查、诊断和治疗的机会仍然有限,特别是在农村地区。Wajir县缺乏全面的癌症治疗途径和专业的肿瘤学工作人员,这加剧了早期发现、治疗和姑息治疗方面的挑战。该研究评估了Wajir县转诊医院(WCRH)癌症护理服务的可用性,包括筛查、诊断服务、治疗方式和转诊系统。该研究进一步探讨了癌症治疗的差距,关注患者的观点,并提出了应对这些挑战的潜在解决方案。方法:本研究采用定性与定量相结合的方法,从WCRH患者的角度了解肿瘤护理。该研究涉及确诊癌症的成年患者(18岁以上),他们在2024年2月至4月期间接受了治疗或后续护理。数据是通过访谈和调查收集的,研究助理帮助进行语言翻译和社区导航。该研究收集了有关人口统计学、癌症类型和患病率的信息,并使用描述性统计对其进行了分析。定性数据侧重于患者对癌症的认识、治疗和护理差距的经历,并对共同主题进行了分析。获得伦理批准,所有参与者均给予知情同意。结果:本研究纳入25例在WCRH接受治疗的癌症患者(男性12例,女性13例)。最常见的癌症是食道癌(44%)、宫颈癌(28%)、乳腺癌(24%)和前列腺癌(8%)。诊断延误很严重,12%的患者等待6年以上,24%等待4-6年,40%等待1-3年才寻求治疗。大多数诊断是在WCRH做出的(64%),其他诊断是在加里萨癌症中心(22%)或内罗毕(20%)做出的。WCRH提供的诊断工具包括巴氏涂片、乳房x光检查、PSA检查、超声波、CT扫描和活组织检查。然而,获得这些工具的机会有限,钡剂吞检(32%)是食管癌最常用的检查方法,其次是巴氏涂片检查、活检和超声检查(各占16%)。患者对宫颈癌(68%)和乳腺癌(60%)的癌症筛查意识较高,但对前列腺癌(32%)和食管癌(4%)的癌症筛查意识较低。尽管意识到了这一点,但只有8%的人曾经接受过筛查。在治疗方面,大多数患者(80%)知道手术选择,而知道化疗(28%)或姑息治疗(12%)的患者较少。当WCRH无法提供治疗时,大多数患者选择加里萨癌症中心(80%)或内罗毕(52%)。经济困难是88%患者治疗的主要障碍,患者建议改善当地癌症护理,补贴治疗,加强早期发现和筛查服务。结论:研究结果表明,晚期癌症诊断负担高,癌症筛查和治疗服务不足,癌症护理途径和患者导航系统的可及性有限。这些结果强调迫切需要改善癌症治疗途径,提高认识,提高医疗保健能力,以降低肯尼亚北部的癌症发病率和死亡率。这项研究有助于了解瓦吉尔县的癌症护理状况,并为未来旨在弥合癌症护理方面现有差距的卫生政策举措奠定基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
138
审稿时长
27 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信