A machine learning-based severity stratification tool for high altitude pulmonary edema.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Luobu Gesang, Yangzong Suona, Zhuoga Danzeng, Bai Ci, Quzhen Gesang, WangJiu Cidan, Qiangba Dingzeng, Zhuoga Baima, Quzhen Zhaxi
{"title":"A machine learning-based severity stratification tool for high altitude pulmonary edema.","authors":"Luobu Gesang, Yangzong Suona, Zhuoga Danzeng, Bai Ci, Quzhen Gesang, WangJiu Cidan, Qiangba Dingzeng, Zhuoga Baima, Quzhen Zhaxi","doi":"10.1186/s12911-025-02992-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to identify key predictors for the severity of High Altitude Pulmonary Edema (HAPE) to assist clinicians in promptly recognizing severely affected patients in the emergency department, thereby reducing associated mortality rates. Multinomail logistic regression, random forest, and decision tree methods were utilized to determine important predictor variables and evaluate model performance. A total of 508 patients diagnosed with HAPE were included in the study, with 53 variables analyzed. Lung rales, sputum sputuming, heart rate, and oxygen saturation were identified as the most relevant predictors for the LASSO model. Subsequently, Multinomail logistic regression, decision tree, and random forest models were trained and evaluated using these factors on a test set. The random forest model showed the highest performance, with an accuracy of 77.94%, precision of 70.27%, recall of 68.22%, and F1 score of 68.96%, outperforming the other models. Further analysis revealed significant differences in predictive capabilities among the models for HAPE patients at varying severity levels. The random forest model demonstrated high predictive accuracy across all severity levels of HAPE, particularly excelling in identifying severely ill patients with an impressive AUC of 0.86. The study assessed the reliability and effectiveness of the HAPE severity scoring model by validating Multinomail logistic regression and random forest models. This study introduces a valuable screening tool for categorizing the severity of HAPE, aiding healthcare providers in recognizing individuals with severe HAPE, enabling prompt treatment and the formulation of suitable therapeutic approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":9340,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","volume":"25 1","pages":"171"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12008950/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-025-02992-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to identify key predictors for the severity of High Altitude Pulmonary Edema (HAPE) to assist clinicians in promptly recognizing severely affected patients in the emergency department, thereby reducing associated mortality rates. Multinomail logistic regression, random forest, and decision tree methods were utilized to determine important predictor variables and evaluate model performance. A total of 508 patients diagnosed with HAPE were included in the study, with 53 variables analyzed. Lung rales, sputum sputuming, heart rate, and oxygen saturation were identified as the most relevant predictors for the LASSO model. Subsequently, Multinomail logistic regression, decision tree, and random forest models were trained and evaluated using these factors on a test set. The random forest model showed the highest performance, with an accuracy of 77.94%, precision of 70.27%, recall of 68.22%, and F1 score of 68.96%, outperforming the other models. Further analysis revealed significant differences in predictive capabilities among the models for HAPE patients at varying severity levels. The random forest model demonstrated high predictive accuracy across all severity levels of HAPE, particularly excelling in identifying severely ill patients with an impressive AUC of 0.86. The study assessed the reliability and effectiveness of the HAPE severity scoring model by validating Multinomail logistic regression and random forest models. This study introduces a valuable screening tool for categorizing the severity of HAPE, aiding healthcare providers in recognizing individuals with severe HAPE, enabling prompt treatment and the formulation of suitable therapeutic approaches.

基于机器学习的高原肺水肿严重程度分层工具。
本研究旨在确定高原肺水肿(HAPE)严重程度的关键预测因素,以帮助临床医生及时识别急诊科的严重患者,从而降低相关死亡率。多邮件逻辑回归、随机森林和决策树方法被用来确定重要的预测变量和评估模型的性能。共有508名确诊为HAPE的患者被纳入研究,分析了53个变量。肺啰音、痰液、心率和血氧饱和度被认为是LASSO模型最相关的预测因子。随后,多邮件逻辑回归、决策树和随机森林模型在测试集上使用这些因素进行训练和评估。随机森林模型的准确率为77.94%,精密度为70.27%,召回率为68.22%,F1得分为68.96%,优于其他模型。进一步分析显示,不同严重程度的HAPE患者模型的预测能力存在显著差异。随机森林模型在所有严重程度的HAPE中都显示出很高的预测准确性,特别是在识别重症患者方面表现出色,AUC为0.86。本研究通过验证多邮件逻辑回归和随机森林模型来评估HAPE严重性评分模型的可靠性和有效性。本研究介绍了一种有价值的筛选工具,用于对HAPE的严重程度进行分类,帮助医疗保健提供者识别患有严重HAPE的个体,使及时治疗和制定合适的治疗方法成为可能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the design, development, implementation, use, and evaluation of health information technologies and decision-making for human health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信