Perceptual discrimination learning in children with and without autism: The effect of feedback, modality, and progressive-learning.

IF 3.2 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Barbara A Church, Jonathan D Rodgers, Brooke N Jackson, Matthew G Wisniewski, Stacy Moppert, Christopher Lopata, Marcus L Thomeer, Eduardo Mercado
{"title":"Perceptual discrimination learning in children with and without autism: The effect of feedback, modality, and progressive-learning.","authors":"Barbara A Church, Jonathan D Rodgers, Brooke N Jackson, Matthew G Wisniewski, Stacy Moppert, Christopher Lopata, Marcus L Thomeer, Eduardo Mercado","doi":"10.3758/s13423-025-02688-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research suggests autistic children learn and generalize visual family-resemblance categories atypically (e.g., Church, et al., 2010, 2015), particularly when learning incidentally from exposure. This may reflect differences in perceptual learning (Mercado et al., 2020). However, it is unknown whether perceptual discrimination learning is also atypical and if differences extend to other modalities. To address this, autistic children with normal language abilities and IQ and typically developing (TD) matched comparison children completed auditory and visual discrimination tasks, after either incidental exposure to or direct training with stimuli presented in either progressive (easy-to-hard) or random orders of difficulty. In the visual task, both autistic and TD children only performed well after progressive training, suggesting limited perceptual learning from incidental visual exposure. In the auditory task, autistic children showed a progressive learning advantage after both exposure and training, but TD children only showed this advantage after training. They also had significantly better auditory discrimination than TD children after progressive training. These findings suggest typical visual discrimination learning after progressive training and enhanced auditory discrimination learning after progressive training and exposure. This enhanced auditory perceptual learning may help explain why these autistic children are socially impaired while retaining the capacity to learn language.</p>","PeriodicalId":20763,"journal":{"name":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-025-02688-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research suggests autistic children learn and generalize visual family-resemblance categories atypically (e.g., Church, et al., 2010, 2015), particularly when learning incidentally from exposure. This may reflect differences in perceptual learning (Mercado et al., 2020). However, it is unknown whether perceptual discrimination learning is also atypical and if differences extend to other modalities. To address this, autistic children with normal language abilities and IQ and typically developing (TD) matched comparison children completed auditory and visual discrimination tasks, after either incidental exposure to or direct training with stimuli presented in either progressive (easy-to-hard) or random orders of difficulty. In the visual task, both autistic and TD children only performed well after progressive training, suggesting limited perceptual learning from incidental visual exposure. In the auditory task, autistic children showed a progressive learning advantage after both exposure and training, but TD children only showed this advantage after training. They also had significantly better auditory discrimination than TD children after progressive training. These findings suggest typical visual discrimination learning after progressive training and enhanced auditory discrimination learning after progressive training and exposure. This enhanced auditory perceptual learning may help explain why these autistic children are socially impaired while retaining the capacity to learn language.

自闭症儿童和非自闭症儿童的知觉辨别学习:反馈、模态和渐进式学习的影响。
研究表明,自闭症儿童学习和概括视觉家族相似性类别是非典型的(例如,Church等人,2010年,2015年),特别是在偶然接触学习时。这可能反映了感知学习的差异(Mercado et al., 2020)。然而,尚不清楚知觉辨别学习是否也是非典型的,以及差异是否延伸到其他模式。为了解决这个问题,具有正常语言能力和智商的自闭症儿童与典型发育儿童(TD)相匹配的对照组儿童完成了听觉和视觉辨别任务,他们要么偶然接触刺激,要么直接接受渐进式(容易-困难)或随机难度顺序的刺激训练。在视觉任务中,自闭症儿童和TD儿童只有在渐进式训练后才表现良好,这表明偶然视觉暴露的知觉学习有限。在听觉任务中,自闭症儿童在暴露和训练后均表现出渐进式学习优势,而TD儿童仅在训练后才表现出这种优势。经过渐进式训练后,他们的听觉辨别能力也明显优于TD儿童。这些结果表明,渐进式训练后的视觉辨别学习是典型的,而渐进式训练和暴露后的听觉辨别学习是增强的。这种增强的听觉感知学习可能有助于解释为什么这些自闭症儿童在保持学习语言的能力的同时社交受损。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
165
期刊介绍: The journal provides coverage spanning a broad spectrum of topics in all areas of experimental psychology. The journal is primarily dedicated to the publication of theory and review articles and brief reports of outstanding experimental work. Areas of coverage include cognitive psychology broadly construed, including but not limited to action, perception, & attention, language, learning & memory, reasoning & decision making, and social cognition. We welcome submissions that approach these issues from a variety of perspectives such as behavioral measurements, comparative psychology, development, evolutionary psychology, genetics, neuroscience, and quantitative/computational modeling. We particularly encourage integrative research that crosses traditional content and methodological boundaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信