{"title":"Artificial intelligence applications for the diagnosis of pulmonary nodules.","authors":"David E Ost","doi":"10.1097/MCP.0000000000001179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review evaluates the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in diagnosing solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs), focusing on clinical applications and limitations in pulmonary medicine. It explores AI's utility in imaging and blood/tissue-based diagnostics, emphasizing practical challenges over technical details of deep learning methods.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>AI enhances computed tomography (CT)-based computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) through steps like nodule detection, false positive reduction, segmentation, and classification, leveraging convolutional neural networks and machine learning. Segmentation achieves Dice similarity coefficients of 0.70-0.92, while malignancy classification yields areas under the curve of 0.86-0.97. AI-driven blood tests, incorporating RNA sequencing and clinical data, report AUCs up to 0.907 for distinguishing benign from malignant nodules. However, most models lack prospective, multiinstitutional validation, risking overfitting and limited generalizability. The \"black box\" nature of AI, coupled with overlapping inputs (e.g., nodule size, smoking history) with physician assessments, complicates integration into clinical workflows and precludes standard Bayesian analysis.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>AI shows promise for SPN diagnosis but requires rigorous validation in diverse populations and better clinician training for effective use. Rather than replacing judgment, AI should serve as a second opinion, with its reported performance metrics understood as study-specific, not directly applicable at the bedside due to double-counting issues.</p>","PeriodicalId":11090,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCP.0000000000001179","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose of review: This review evaluates the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in diagnosing solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs), focusing on clinical applications and limitations in pulmonary medicine. It explores AI's utility in imaging and blood/tissue-based diagnostics, emphasizing practical challenges over technical details of deep learning methods.
Recent findings: AI enhances computed tomography (CT)-based computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) through steps like nodule detection, false positive reduction, segmentation, and classification, leveraging convolutional neural networks and machine learning. Segmentation achieves Dice similarity coefficients of 0.70-0.92, while malignancy classification yields areas under the curve of 0.86-0.97. AI-driven blood tests, incorporating RNA sequencing and clinical data, report AUCs up to 0.907 for distinguishing benign from malignant nodules. However, most models lack prospective, multiinstitutional validation, risking overfitting and limited generalizability. The "black box" nature of AI, coupled with overlapping inputs (e.g., nodule size, smoking history) with physician assessments, complicates integration into clinical workflows and precludes standard Bayesian analysis.
Summary: AI shows promise for SPN diagnosis but requires rigorous validation in diverse populations and better clinician training for effective use. Rather than replacing judgment, AI should serve as a second opinion, with its reported performance metrics understood as study-specific, not directly applicable at the bedside due to double-counting issues.
期刊介绍:
Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine is a highly regarded journal offering insightful editorials and on-the-mark invited reviews, covering key subjects such as asthma; cystic fibrosis; infectious diseases; diseases of the pleura; and sleep and respiratory neurobiology. Published bimonthly, each issue of Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine introduces world renowned guest editors and internationally recognized academics within the pulmonary field, delivering a widespread selection of expert assessments on the latest developments from the most recent literature.