Planetary health diet, mediterranean diet and micronutrient intake adequacy in the Seguimiento Universidad de Navarra (SUN) cohort.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Karen Berenice Guzmán-Castellanos, Susana Santiago Neri, Itziar Zazpe García, Aitor Hernández-Hernández, Mariano Valdés-Mas, Maira Bes-Rastrollo, Miguel Ángel Martinez-González
{"title":"Planetary health diet, mediterranean diet and micronutrient intake adequacy in the Seguimiento Universidad de Navarra (SUN) cohort.","authors":"Karen Berenice Guzmán-Castellanos, Susana Santiago Neri, Itziar Zazpe García, Aitor Hernández-Hernández, Mariano Valdés-Mas, Maira Bes-Rastrollo, Miguel Ángel Martinez-González","doi":"10.1007/s00394-025-03657-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Our study aimed to investigate and compare the association between adherence to a priori Planetary Health Diet Index and two well-known Mediterranean indices, the Mediterranean Diet Score (MDS) and the Mediterranean Adherence Screener (MEDAS), and micronutrient intake adequacy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We assessed 18,259 Spanish university graduates at baseline who participated in the SUN cohort using a validated semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire. Inadequate intake of Zn, I, Se, Fe, Ca, P, Mg, Cr, K, vitamins B<sub>1</sub>, B<sub>2</sub>, B<sub>3</sub>, B<sub>6</sub>, B<sub>12</sub>, C, A, D, E, and folic acid was evaluated using the estimated average requirement (EAR) cut-point approach and the probabilistic approach. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to estimate the probability of failing to meet EAR for either ≥ 3 or ≥ 6 micronutrients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants with higher adherence to the Planetary Health Diet had a lower risk of overall inadequacy, while the Mediterranean Diet (MedDiet) showed even greater nutritional adequacy. The adjusted Odds Ratio (OR) for failing to meet ≥ 3 EAR was 0·24 (95% CI 0·21 - 0·27) for the Planetary Health Diet Index, whereas it was substantially lower for MEDAS with OR = 0·12, 95% CI 0·11 - 0·13, and for MDS with OR = 0·09, 95% CI 0·08 - 0·10, always for the comparison of the fourth v. first quartile and using the probabilistic approach method.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this Mediterranean cohort, better adherence to both the Planetary Health Diet and the MedDiet (with a stronger inverse association) showed lower risk of micronutrient inadequacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12030,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Nutrition","volume":"64 4","pages":"149"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11982129/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-025-03657-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Our study aimed to investigate and compare the association between adherence to a priori Planetary Health Diet Index and two well-known Mediterranean indices, the Mediterranean Diet Score (MDS) and the Mediterranean Adherence Screener (MEDAS), and micronutrient intake adequacy.

Methods: We assessed 18,259 Spanish university graduates at baseline who participated in the SUN cohort using a validated semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire. Inadequate intake of Zn, I, Se, Fe, Ca, P, Mg, Cr, K, vitamins B1, B2, B3, B6, B12, C, A, D, E, and folic acid was evaluated using the estimated average requirement (EAR) cut-point approach and the probabilistic approach. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to estimate the probability of failing to meet EAR for either ≥ 3 or ≥ 6 micronutrients.

Results: Participants with higher adherence to the Planetary Health Diet had a lower risk of overall inadequacy, while the Mediterranean Diet (MedDiet) showed even greater nutritional adequacy. The adjusted Odds Ratio (OR) for failing to meet ≥ 3 EAR was 0·24 (95% CI 0·21 - 0·27) for the Planetary Health Diet Index, whereas it was substantially lower for MEDAS with OR = 0·12, 95% CI 0·11 - 0·13, and for MDS with OR = 0·09, 95% CI 0·08 - 0·10, always for the comparison of the fourth v. first quartile and using the probabilistic approach method.

Conclusion: In this Mediterranean cohort, better adherence to both the Planetary Health Diet and the MedDiet (with a stronger inverse association) showed lower risk of micronutrient inadequacy.

行星健康饮食、地中海饮食和微量营养素摄入充足性在纳瓦拉大学(SUN)队列中的研究
目的:我们的研究旨在调查和比较遵守先验行星健康饮食指数和两个著名的地中海指数,地中海饮食评分(MDS)和地中海依从性筛查(MEDAS)与微量营养素摄入充足性之间的关系。方法:我们使用经过验证的半定量食物频率问卷评估了18259名参加SUN队列的西班牙大学毕业生。锌、碘、硒、铁、钙、磷、镁、铬、钾、维生素B1、B2、B3、B6、B12、C、A、D、E和叶酸的摄入不足采用估计平均需要量(EAR)临界值法和概率法进行评估。采用Logistic回归分析估计≥3或≥6种微量营养素未达到EAR的概率。结果:坚持行星健康饮食的参与者总体营养不足的风险较低,而地中海饮食(MedDiet)显示出更大的营养充足性。对于行星健康饮食指数,未达到≥3 EAR的调整优势比(OR)为0.24 (95% CI 0.21 - 0.27),而MEDAS的调整优势比(OR = 0.12, 95% CI 0.11 - 0.13)和MDS的调整优势比(OR = 0.09, 95% CI 0.08 - 0.10)要低得多,通常用于比较第四个四分位数和第一个四分位数并使用概率方法。结论:在这个地中海队列中,更好地遵守行星健康饮食和MedDiet(具有更强的负相关)表明微量营养素缺乏的风险较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
2.00%
发文量
295
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Nutrition publishes original papers, reviews, and short communications in the nutritional sciences. The manuscripts submitted to the European Journal of Nutrition should have their major focus on the impact of nutrients and non-nutrients on immunology and inflammation, gene expression, metabolism, chronic diseases, or carcinogenesis, or a major focus on epidemiology, including intervention studies with healthy subjects and with patients, biofunctionality of food and food components, or the impact of diet on the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信