Outcomes of a pilot feasibility study of comprehensive geriatric assessment for younger frail patients with severe mental illness.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Urska Arnautovska, Rebecca Soole, Winona Wing Ling Kwan, Natasha Reid, Andrea Baker, Emily H Gordon, Ruth E Hubbard, Dan Siskind, Nicola Warren
{"title":"Outcomes of a pilot feasibility study of comprehensive geriatric assessment for younger frail patients with severe mental illness.","authors":"Urska Arnautovska, Rebecca Soole, Winona Wing Ling Kwan, Natasha Reid, Andrea Baker, Emily H Gordon, Ruth E Hubbard, Dan Siskind, Nicola Warren","doi":"10.1186/s12888-025-06830-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Individuals with severe mental illness (SMI) are at risk of early-onset frailty, leading to adverse outcomes. Effective interventions for reducing frailty in this population are currently lacking.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To assess the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA), delivered by an Advanced Trainee in Geriatric Medicine, as an intervention for individuals with co-occurring frailty and SMI.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Participants, aged 18-64, with frailty and SMI were recruited from public community outpatient clinics between July 2022 and January 2023. Feasibility of CGA was evaluated through mixed methods. Secondary outcomes included a range of mental and physical health factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 38 eligible individuals, 17 were enrolled and 14 completed the study; three dropped out post-baseline assessment and CGA. 86% were male, average age was 48.4, Body Mass Index 34.6, and Frailty Index 0.35. Participants expressed high acceptability and perceived benefits of CGA, including increased insight about one's health and receipt of multidisciplinary holistic care. While this study was inadequately powered to show statistically significant changes in secondary outcomes, positive trends were observed in overall psychosis symptoms and weekly physical activity engagement which increased by 56.6 min, reaching the recommended levels to achieve health benefits.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of this study support the feasibility of CGA as an intervention in routine care of people with SMI and provide evidence for designing future trials of frailty interventions in this population. The study underscores the significance of tailored, multidisciplinary, and individualised approaches, though further research is required to substantiate its efficacy in this priority population.</p>","PeriodicalId":9029,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychiatry","volume":"25 1","pages":"473"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12070768/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-025-06830-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Individuals with severe mental illness (SMI) are at risk of early-onset frailty, leading to adverse outcomes. Effective interventions for reducing frailty in this population are currently lacking.

Aims: To assess the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA), delivered by an Advanced Trainee in Geriatric Medicine, as an intervention for individuals with co-occurring frailty and SMI.

Method: Participants, aged 18-64, with frailty and SMI were recruited from public community outpatient clinics between July 2022 and January 2023. Feasibility of CGA was evaluated through mixed methods. Secondary outcomes included a range of mental and physical health factors.

Results: Out of 38 eligible individuals, 17 were enrolled and 14 completed the study; three dropped out post-baseline assessment and CGA. 86% were male, average age was 48.4, Body Mass Index 34.6, and Frailty Index 0.35. Participants expressed high acceptability and perceived benefits of CGA, including increased insight about one's health and receipt of multidisciplinary holistic care. While this study was inadequately powered to show statistically significant changes in secondary outcomes, positive trends were observed in overall psychosis symptoms and weekly physical activity engagement which increased by 56.6 min, reaching the recommended levels to achieve health benefits.

Conclusion: The findings of this study support the feasibility of CGA as an intervention in routine care of people with SMI and provide evidence for designing future trials of frailty interventions in this population. The study underscores the significance of tailored, multidisciplinary, and individualised approaches, though further research is required to substantiate its efficacy in this priority population.

对伴有严重精神疾病的年轻体弱患者进行老年综合评估的试点可行性研究结果
背景:患有严重精神疾病(SMI)的个体有早发性虚弱的风险,导致不良后果。目前缺乏有效的干预措施来减少这一人群的脆弱性。目的:评估由老年医学高级培训生提供的综合老年评估(CGA)作为同时发生虚弱和重度精神分裂症个体的干预措施的可行性、可接受性和初步效果。方法:在2022年7月至2023年1月期间从公共社区门诊招募年龄在18-64岁、体弱多病和重度精神障碍的参与者。采用混合方法对CGA的可行性进行了评价。次要结果包括一系列心理和身体健康因素。结果:38名符合条件的受试者中,17人入组,14人完成研究;3人退出基线后评估和CGA。86%为男性,平均年龄48.4岁,体质指数34.6,体质指数0.35。参与者表达了对CGA的高度可接受性和可感知的益处,包括对个人健康的更深入了解和接受多学科整体护理。虽然这项研究不足以显示次要结果的统计学显著变化,但在总体精神病症状和每周体育活动增加56.6分钟方面观察到积极趋势,达到了实现健康益处的推荐水平。结论:本研究的结果支持了CGA作为重度精神障碍患者常规护理干预的可行性,并为设计未来在该人群中进行虚弱干预的试验提供了证据。该研究强调了量身定制、多学科和个性化方法的重要性,尽管需要进一步的研究来证实其在这一优先人群中的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Psychiatry
BMC Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
716
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychiatry is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of psychiatric disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信