Theories and concepts about society, dying, and bereavement commonly discussed in education about death, dying, and bereavement.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Charles A Corr, Kenneth J Doka
{"title":"Theories and concepts about society, dying, and bereavement commonly discussed in education about death, dying, and bereavement.","authors":"Charles A Corr, Kenneth J Doka","doi":"10.1080/07481187.2025.2487770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article describes and offers some evaluations of fifteen prominent theories and concepts in the field of death, dying, and bereavement. These theories and concepts range from claims about \"death-denying societies\" and the concept of \"societal death systems\" to theories about coping with dying and coping with loss, grief, and bereavement. Also examined are the concept of disenfranchised grief and theories about contrasting grief styles. Because each of these theories and concepts is often discussed in education about death, dying, and bereavement, it is important that instructors and students understand both their strengths and limitations. The goal of this analysis is twofold: (1) To help guide educators as they explain these theories and concepts to their students and readers, and (2) To assist educators in commenting on the soundness and usefulness of these theoretical frameworks. Five specific lessons for educators are also set forth in the course of this discussion.</p>","PeriodicalId":11041,"journal":{"name":"Death Studies","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Death Studies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2025.2487770","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article describes and offers some evaluations of fifteen prominent theories and concepts in the field of death, dying, and bereavement. These theories and concepts range from claims about "death-denying societies" and the concept of "societal death systems" to theories about coping with dying and coping with loss, grief, and bereavement. Also examined are the concept of disenfranchised grief and theories about contrasting grief styles. Because each of these theories and concepts is often discussed in education about death, dying, and bereavement, it is important that instructors and students understand both their strengths and limitations. The goal of this analysis is twofold: (1) To help guide educators as they explain these theories and concepts to their students and readers, and (2) To assist educators in commenting on the soundness and usefulness of these theoretical frameworks. Five specific lessons for educators are also set forth in the course of this discussion.

关于社会、死亡和丧亲之痛的理论和概念,在关于死亡、临终和丧亲之痛的教育中经常被讨论。
本文对死亡、临终和丧亲之痛领域的15个重要理论和概念进行了描述和评价。这些理论和概念的范围从“否认死亡的社会”和“社会死亡系统”的概念,到关于应对死亡和应对损失、悲伤和丧亲之痛的理论。也检查了被剥夺的悲伤的概念和理论的对比悲伤风格。因为这些理论和概念经常在关于死亡、临终和丧亲之痛的教育中被讨论,所以教师和学生了解它们的优点和局限性是很重要的。这一分析的目的是双重的:(1)帮助指导教育工作者向学生和读者解释这些理论和概念,(2)帮助教育工作者评论这些理论框架的合理性和实用性。在讨论的过程中,还为教育工作者提出了五个具体的教训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Death Studies
Death Studies Multiple-
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
7.90%
发文量
94
期刊介绍: Now published ten times each year, this acclaimed journal provides refereed papers on significant research, scholarship, and practical approaches in the fast growing areas of bereavement and loss, grief therapy, death attitudes, suicide, and death education. It provides an international interdisciplinary forum in which a variety of professionals share results of research and practice, with the aim of better understanding the human encounter with death and assisting those who work with the dying and their families.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信