Spiritual Communication Between Pediatric Oncologists, Caregivers, and Patients With Brain Tumors.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Alexandra K Superdock, Amy S Porter, Walter Spears, Justin N Baker, Jennifer W Mack, Erica C Kaye
{"title":"Spiritual Communication Between Pediatric Oncologists, Caregivers, and Patients With Brain Tumors.","authors":"Alexandra K Superdock, Amy S Porter, Walter Spears, Justin N Baker, Jennifer W Mack, Erica C Kaye","doi":"10.1002/pbc.31721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Spiritual care is recognized as an essential component of standard care for children with cancer and their families. Oncologists lack training in navigating spirituality discussions in primary cancer care. The current landscape of spiritual dialog during clinical oncology encounters remains understudied.</p><p><strong>Procedures: </strong>This qualitative study described the frequency, context, and content of religious and spiritual communication between pediatric neuro-oncologists, caregivers, and patients with brain tumors during disease re-evaluation encounters. This study is part of the U-CHAT trial (NCT02846038), a prospective longitudinal investigation of real-time clinical communication across the trajectory of poor-prognosis cancer. Patients with brain tumors and their caregivers were eligible if their primary oncologist estimated ≤50% survival. All disease re-evaluation encounters for enrolled patients were audio-recorded and underwent rapid qualitative analysis to identify, summarize, and synthesize religious and spiritual communication.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Religious or spiritual references were identified in 23 (18%) of 129 total encounters. References usually comprised a single religious or spiritual term, with \"prayer\"-related language representing the majority of references. Caregivers introduced spiritual dialog more often than oncologists (65% vs. 35%). References were most often identified in the context of a discussion about an uncertain or uncontrollable future.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results suggest oncologists rarely integrate spiritual care into disease re-evaluation discussions. In light of recommendations from multiple consensus groups to integrate spiritual care into cancer care, future work should explore how generalist spiritual care training could better equip oncologists to attend to spiritual needs that arise along the cancer trajectory.</p>","PeriodicalId":19822,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Blood & Cancer","volume":" ","pages":"e31721"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Blood & Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.31721","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Spiritual care is recognized as an essential component of standard care for children with cancer and their families. Oncologists lack training in navigating spirituality discussions in primary cancer care. The current landscape of spiritual dialog during clinical oncology encounters remains understudied.

Procedures: This qualitative study described the frequency, context, and content of religious and spiritual communication between pediatric neuro-oncologists, caregivers, and patients with brain tumors during disease re-evaluation encounters. This study is part of the U-CHAT trial (NCT02846038), a prospective longitudinal investigation of real-time clinical communication across the trajectory of poor-prognosis cancer. Patients with brain tumors and their caregivers were eligible if their primary oncologist estimated ≤50% survival. All disease re-evaluation encounters for enrolled patients were audio-recorded and underwent rapid qualitative analysis to identify, summarize, and synthesize religious and spiritual communication.

Results: Religious or spiritual references were identified in 23 (18%) of 129 total encounters. References usually comprised a single religious or spiritual term, with "prayer"-related language representing the majority of references. Caregivers introduced spiritual dialog more often than oncologists (65% vs. 35%). References were most often identified in the context of a discussion about an uncertain or uncontrollable future.

Conclusions: Results suggest oncologists rarely integrate spiritual care into disease re-evaluation discussions. In light of recommendations from multiple consensus groups to integrate spiritual care into cancer care, future work should explore how generalist spiritual care training could better equip oncologists to attend to spiritual needs that arise along the cancer trajectory.

儿科肿瘤学家、护理人员和脑肿瘤患者之间的精神交流。
背景:精神关怀被认为是癌症儿童及其家庭标准护理的重要组成部分。肿瘤学家缺乏在初级癌症治疗中引导灵性讨论的培训。在临床肿瘤学遇到的精神对话的当前景观仍有待研究。程序:本定性研究描述了儿科神经肿瘤学家、护理人员和脑肿瘤患者在疾病再评估会面期间的宗教和精神交流的频率、背景和内容。该研究是U-CHAT试验(NCT02846038)的一部分,U-CHAT试验是一项跨预后不良癌症轨迹实时临床交流的前瞻性纵向研究。如果原发肿瘤科医生估计脑肿瘤患者的存活率≤50%,则脑肿瘤患者及其护理人员符合条件。所有入组患者的疾病再评估遭遇都被录音,并进行快速定性分析,以识别、总结和综合宗教和精神交流。结果:在129次会面中,有23次(18%)被确定为宗教或精神参考。参考文献通常由单一的宗教或精神术语组成,与“祈祷”相关的语言代表了大多数参考文献。护理人员比肿瘤科医生更常引入精神对话(65%对35%)。参考文献通常是在讨论不确定或不可控的未来的背景下确定的。结论:结果提示肿瘤学家很少将精神护理纳入疾病再评估讨论。根据多个共识团体的建议,将精神护理整合到癌症治疗中,未来的工作应该探索如何通过通才精神护理培训更好地装备肿瘤医生,以满足癌症发展过程中出现的精神需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Blood & Cancer
Pediatric Blood & Cancer 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
9.40%
发文量
546
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Pediatric Blood & Cancer publishes the highest quality manuscripts describing basic and clinical investigations of blood disorders and malignant diseases of childhood including diagnosis, treatment, epidemiology, etiology, biology, and molecular and clinical genetics of these diseases as they affect children, adolescents, and young adults. Pediatric Blood & Cancer will also include studies on such treatment options as hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, immunology, and gene therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信