Association of eosinophil-to-monocyte ratio with asthma exacerbations in adults: a cross-sectional analysis of NHANES data.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Congyi Xie, Jinzhan Chen, Haiyan Chen, Ning Zhang
{"title":"Association of eosinophil-to-monocyte ratio with asthma exacerbations in adults: a cross-sectional analysis of NHANES data.","authors":"Congyi Xie, Jinzhan Chen, Haiyan Chen, Ning Zhang","doi":"10.1186/s12890-025-03617-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The eosinophil-to-monocyte ratio (EMR) has emerged as a promising biomarker for assessing inflammation in various diseases, and this study aims to investigate its potential in predicting asthma exacerbations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study used data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999-2020. A total of 4,738 adults were included in the analysis, and weighted analyses were performed to ensure a representative sample of the general population. The relationship between EMR and asthma exacerbation risk was assessed using multivariable logistic regression with progressively adjusted covariates across multiple models. Subgroup analyses were performed by stratifying key covariates to explore interactions. Restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis was applied to evaluate non-linear relationships. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness and reliability of the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Elevated EMR levels were significantly associated with an increased risk of asthma exacerbations (p < 0.001 in all models). In the highest EMR quartile (Q4), the odds ratio for exacerbation compared to the lowest quartile (Q1) was 1.54 (95% CI: 1.23, 1.93) in Model 1, increasing to 1.56 (95% CI: 1.24, 1.97) in Model 2 and 1.58 (95% CI: 1.24, 2.02) in Model 3, after further adjustments. Subgroup analyses showed consistent associations across various characteristics (all p for interaction > 0.05), while RCS analysis revealed a linear relationship without threshold effects (p for nonlinear > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EMR demonstrates strong potential as a biomarker for predicting asthma exacerbations, with implications for personalized asthma management.</p>","PeriodicalId":9148,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pulmonary Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"172"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11992703/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pulmonary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-025-03617-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The eosinophil-to-monocyte ratio (EMR) has emerged as a promising biomarker for assessing inflammation in various diseases, and this study aims to investigate its potential in predicting asthma exacerbations.

Methods: This cross-sectional study used data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999-2020. A total of 4,738 adults were included in the analysis, and weighted analyses were performed to ensure a representative sample of the general population. The relationship between EMR and asthma exacerbation risk was assessed using multivariable logistic regression with progressively adjusted covariates across multiple models. Subgroup analyses were performed by stratifying key covariates to explore interactions. Restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis was applied to evaluate non-linear relationships. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness and reliability of the results.

Results: Elevated EMR levels were significantly associated with an increased risk of asthma exacerbations (p < 0.001 in all models). In the highest EMR quartile (Q4), the odds ratio for exacerbation compared to the lowest quartile (Q1) was 1.54 (95% CI: 1.23, 1.93) in Model 1, increasing to 1.56 (95% CI: 1.24, 1.97) in Model 2 and 1.58 (95% CI: 1.24, 2.02) in Model 3, after further adjustments. Subgroup analyses showed consistent associations across various characteristics (all p for interaction > 0.05), while RCS analysis revealed a linear relationship without threshold effects (p for nonlinear > 0.05).

Conclusion: EMR demonstrates strong potential as a biomarker for predicting asthma exacerbations, with implications for personalized asthma management.

嗜酸性粒细胞与单核细胞比值与成人哮喘加重的关联:NHANES数据的横断面分析
背景:嗜酸性粒细胞与单核细胞比率(EMR)已成为评估各种疾病炎症的一种有前景的生物标志物,本研究旨在探讨其预测哮喘恶化的潜力。方法:本横断面研究使用1999-2020年国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)的数据。总共有4,738名成年人被纳入分析,并进行加权分析以确保一般人群的代表性样本。EMR与哮喘加重风险之间的关系采用多变量logistic回归进行评估,并在多个模型中逐步调整协变量。亚组分析通过对关键协变量进行分层来探索相互作用。限制三次样条(RCS)分析用于评价非线性关系。敏感性分析证实了结果的稳健性和可靠性。结果:EMR水平升高与哮喘发作风险增加显著相关(p < 0.05),而RCS分析显示无阈值效应的线性关系(p < 0.05)。结论:EMR显示了作为预测哮喘恶化的生物标志物的强大潜力,具有个性化哮喘管理的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Pulmonary Medicine
BMC Pulmonary Medicine RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
423
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pulmonary Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of pulmonary and associated disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信