Efficacy analysis of microinvasive glaucoma surgery alone or in combination with phacoemulsification in patients with normal tension glaucoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Zhen Yu, Mengfan Wu, YuFei Tao, Zihan Huang, Mingmin Yang, Xiaohua Pan, Dimitrios Ntentakis, Ning Fan
{"title":"Efficacy analysis of microinvasive glaucoma surgery alone or in combination with phacoemulsification in patients with normal tension glaucoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Zhen Yu, Mengfan Wu, YuFei Tao, Zihan Huang, Mingmin Yang, Xiaohua Pan, Dimitrios Ntentakis, Ning Fan","doi":"10.1186/s12886-025-04104-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the effectiveness of minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) as monotherapy, or in combination with phacoemulsification, in the management of normal tension glaucoma (NTG).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature review and meta-analysis were conducted. The literature search was performed using four electronic databases, including Pubmed, Embase, Web of science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, to identify studies evaluating the efficacy of MIGS on patients with NTG, published from October 1, 2019 to October 1, 2024. The articles meeting our inclusion criteria were independently screened and assessed by three reviewers. Effect estimates associated with NTG were pooled and evaluated via meta-analysis. The articles retrieved from the databases were systematically analyzed using Citespace 6.2.R3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 11 English-language studies involving 413 eyes from 327 NTG patients were included. Follow-up ranged from 6 to 60 months. MIGS alone reduced IOP by 2.62 mmHg (95% CI: -3.70 to -1.54; Z = 4.77, P < 0.00001), while MIGS with cataract surgery reduced IOP by 2.09 mmHg (95% CI: -2.83 to -1.35; Z = 5.53, P < 0.00001). The number of IOP-lowering medications decreased by 1.47 with MIGS alone (95% CI: -2.16 to -0.77; Z = 4.07, P < 0.0001) and by 1.13 with combined surgery (95% CI: -1.75 to -0.52; Z = 3.63, P = 0.0003). No significant differences were observed between the two surgical approaches.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The meta-analysis demonstrated that either MIGS alone or combined with phacoemulsification effectively reduced the IOP and the requirement for IOP-lowering medications in NTG patients. MIGS alone or combined with phacoemulsification reduced the IOP most at 12 months, and the lowest IOP-lowering medications at 24 months in postoperative patients with NTG.</p>","PeriodicalId":9058,"journal":{"name":"BMC Ophthalmology","volume":"25 1","pages":"283"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12063262/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-025-04104-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the effectiveness of minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) as monotherapy, or in combination with phacoemulsification, in the management of normal tension glaucoma (NTG).

Methods: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis were conducted. The literature search was performed using four electronic databases, including Pubmed, Embase, Web of science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, to identify studies evaluating the efficacy of MIGS on patients with NTG, published from October 1, 2019 to October 1, 2024. The articles meeting our inclusion criteria were independently screened and assessed by three reviewers. Effect estimates associated with NTG were pooled and evaluated via meta-analysis. The articles retrieved from the databases were systematically analyzed using Citespace 6.2.R3.

Results: A total of 11 English-language studies involving 413 eyes from 327 NTG patients were included. Follow-up ranged from 6 to 60 months. MIGS alone reduced IOP by 2.62 mmHg (95% CI: -3.70 to -1.54; Z = 4.77, P < 0.00001), while MIGS with cataract surgery reduced IOP by 2.09 mmHg (95% CI: -2.83 to -1.35; Z = 5.53, P < 0.00001). The number of IOP-lowering medications decreased by 1.47 with MIGS alone (95% CI: -2.16 to -0.77; Z = 4.07, P < 0.0001) and by 1.13 with combined surgery (95% CI: -1.75 to -0.52; Z = 3.63, P = 0.0003). No significant differences were observed between the two surgical approaches.

Conclusion: The meta-analysis demonstrated that either MIGS alone or combined with phacoemulsification effectively reduced the IOP and the requirement for IOP-lowering medications in NTG patients. MIGS alone or combined with phacoemulsification reduced the IOP most at 12 months, and the lowest IOP-lowering medications at 24 months in postoperative patients with NTG.

微创青光眼手术单独或联合超声乳化术治疗正常张力型青光眼的疗效分析:系统综述和meta分析。
目的:评价微创青光眼手术(MIGS)单独或联合超声乳化术治疗正常张力性青光眼(NTG)的疗效。方法:采用系统文献综述和荟萃分析。文献检索使用四个电子数据库,包括Pubmed、Embase、Web of science和Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials,以确定2019年10月1日至2024年10月1日发表的评估MIGS对NTG患者疗效的研究。符合我们纳入标准的文章由三位审稿人独立筛选和评估。与NTG相关的效应估计通过荟萃分析进行汇总和评估。使用Citespace 6.2.R3对从数据库检索到的文章进行系统分析。结果:共纳入了11项英语研究,涉及327例NTG患者的413只眼睛。随访时间为6 ~ 60个月。单独使用MIGS可使IOP降低2.62 mmHg (95% CI: -3.70 ~ -1.54;结论:荟萃分析表明,单纯使用MIGS或联合超声乳化均可有效降低NTG患者的IOP及对降眼压药物的需求。在NTG术后患者中,单独使用MIGS或联合使用超声乳化术在12个月时降低IOP最多,在24个月时降低IOP最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Ophthalmology
BMC Ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
441
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Ophthalmology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of eye disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信