Cardiac baroreflex sensitivity during repeated handgrip exercise: Comparisons with sit-stand maneuvers and spontaneous rest.

IF 2.2 Q3 PHYSIOLOGY
Wenxing Qin, Marina Fukuie, Daisuke Hoshi, Shoya Mori, Tsubasa Tomoto, Shigehiko Ogoh, Jun Sugawara, Takashi Tarumi
{"title":"Cardiac baroreflex sensitivity during repeated handgrip exercise: Comparisons with sit-stand maneuvers and spontaneous rest.","authors":"Wenxing Qin, Marina Fukuie, Daisuke Hoshi, Shoya Mori, Tsubasa Tomoto, Shigehiko Ogoh, Jun Sugawara, Takashi Tarumi","doi":"10.14814/phy2.70352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The cardiac baroreflex regulates arterial pressure via autonomic heart rate control. While sit-stand maneuvers (SSM) have been used to assess baroreflex sensitivity (BRS), they may be impractical for physically immobile individuals. This study examined cardiac BRS during repeated handgrip exercise (RHE) compared to SSM and spontaneous rest. Twenty participants (10 females) performed 5-min RHE and SSM at 0.10 and 0.05 Hz in random order after spontaneous rest. Cardiac BRS was calculated using transfer function analysis (BRS<sub>TFA</sub>) and the sequence method (BRS<sub>SM</sub>) in low (LF: 0.05-0.15 Hz) and very low (VLF: 0.02-0.07 Hz) frequencies. Power spectral density (PSD) quantified systolic blood pressure (SBP) and R-R interval (RRI) oscillations. Compared to rest, 0.10 and 0.05 Hz RHE significantly increased SBP and RRI PSDs, with the highest values observed during SSM in both frequencies. RHE significantly increased LF and VLF BRS<sub>TFA</sub> coherence by 132% and 142%, while SSM increased them by 144% and 209%. Regardless of analytical methods, BRS remained unchanged during RHE compared to rest, but it significantly decreased during 0.10 Hz SSM, which correlated with increased heart rate. These findings suggest that RHE improves BRS<sub>TFA</sub> estimation via increased coherence, whereas reduced BRS during SSM suggests baroreflex resetting.</p>","PeriodicalId":20083,"journal":{"name":"Physiological Reports","volume":"13 9","pages":"e70352"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12051375/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiological Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.70352","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The cardiac baroreflex regulates arterial pressure via autonomic heart rate control. While sit-stand maneuvers (SSM) have been used to assess baroreflex sensitivity (BRS), they may be impractical for physically immobile individuals. This study examined cardiac BRS during repeated handgrip exercise (RHE) compared to SSM and spontaneous rest. Twenty participants (10 females) performed 5-min RHE and SSM at 0.10 and 0.05 Hz in random order after spontaneous rest. Cardiac BRS was calculated using transfer function analysis (BRSTFA) and the sequence method (BRSSM) in low (LF: 0.05-0.15 Hz) and very low (VLF: 0.02-0.07 Hz) frequencies. Power spectral density (PSD) quantified systolic blood pressure (SBP) and R-R interval (RRI) oscillations. Compared to rest, 0.10 and 0.05 Hz RHE significantly increased SBP and RRI PSDs, with the highest values observed during SSM in both frequencies. RHE significantly increased LF and VLF BRSTFA coherence by 132% and 142%, while SSM increased them by 144% and 209%. Regardless of analytical methods, BRS remained unchanged during RHE compared to rest, but it significantly decreased during 0.10 Hz SSM, which correlated with increased heart rate. These findings suggest that RHE improves BRSTFA estimation via increased coherence, whereas reduced BRS during SSM suggests baroreflex resetting.

反复握力练习时的心脏压力反射敏感性:与坐立动作和自发休息的比较。
心脏压力反射通过自主心率控制来调节动脉压力。虽然坐立演习(SSM)已被用于评估气压反射敏感性(BRS),他们可能是不切实际的身体不能移动的个人。本研究检测了重复握力运动(RHE)与SSM和自发休息时的心脏BRS。20名参与者(10名女性)在自发休息后随机进行5分钟的RHE和SSM,频率分别为0.10和0.05 Hz。采用传递函数分析(BRSTFA)和序列法(BRSSM)在低(LF: 0.05 ~ 0.15 Hz)和极低(VLF: 0.02 ~ 0.07 Hz)频率下计算心脏BRS。功率谱密度(PSD)量化收缩压(SBP)和R-R间期(RRI)振荡。与休息相比,0.10和0.05 Hz RHE显著增加SBP和RRI psd,在SSM期间观察到两个频率的最高值。RHE显著提高了LF和VLF BRSTFA一致性,分别提高了132%和142%,而SSM显著提高了144%和209%。无论采用何种分析方法,与休息相比,RHE期间BRS保持不变,但在0.10 Hz SSM期间显著降低,这与心率增加相关。这些发现表明RHE通过增加一致性来改善BRSTFA估计,而SSM期间BRS的减少表明气压反射重置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physiological Reports
Physiological Reports PHYSIOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
374
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Physiological Reports is an online only, open access journal that will publish peer reviewed research across all areas of basic, translational, and clinical physiology and allied disciplines. Physiological Reports is a collaboration between The Physiological Society and the American Physiological Society, and is therefore in a unique position to serve the international physiology community through quick time to publication while upholding a quality standard of sound research that constitutes a useful contribution to the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信