Incidence of Lymph Node Involvement in Clinically Node-Negative Breast Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Rationale for Selective Omission of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Arith Reyes, Roshni Rao, Lisa Wiechmann, Luona Sun, Stacy Ugras, Bret Taback
{"title":"Incidence of Lymph Node Involvement in Clinically Node-Negative Breast Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Rationale for Selective Omission of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy.","authors":"Arith Reyes, Roshni Rao, Lisa Wiechmann, Luona Sun, Stacy Ugras, Bret Taback","doi":"10.1016/j.clbc.2025.03.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is now frequently utilized for earlier stage breast cancer. Historically, removing axillary lymph nodes (LN) has guided treatment decisions and reduced regional recurrence, yet its utility in clinically node-negative (cN0) patients following NAC has yet to be elucidated. This study evaluated the incidence of residual occult pathologic nodal disease after NAC in cN0 breast cancer and associated clinicopathologic risk factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study of 249 cN0 patients who received NAC at our institution from 2010-2021 was performed. Clinical and pathologic tumor features were compared between 2 groups: persistent LN- versus LN+ after NAC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study group comprised 166 patients: 19 (11.4%) had pathologic LNs positive following NAC. Patients with LN+ (n = 19) versus LN- (n = 147) had greater mean clinical tumor size (P < .01), higher clinical T stage (P < .001), invasive lobular cancer (P < .01), lymphovascular invasion (P 0.01), and ER+ HER2- phenotype (P < .01). Conversely, LN- patients more likely had HER2+ tumors (P < .01) and in-breast pathologic complete response (P < .05). Sentinel LN biopsy (SLNB) obtained a mean of 3.8 LNs with 2 (1.2%) patients having ≥ypN2. At 46 months median follow-up, 1 (0.6%) axillary recurrence occurred.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is a low incidence of both residual occult disease in the axilla and axillary recurrence in cN0 breast cancer patients following NAC. Many of these patients may avoid axillary surgery, or at a maximum, undergo SLNB alone with low concern for axillary recurrence.</p>","PeriodicalId":10197,"journal":{"name":"Clinical breast cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical breast cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2025.03.021","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is now frequently utilized for earlier stage breast cancer. Historically, removing axillary lymph nodes (LN) has guided treatment decisions and reduced regional recurrence, yet its utility in clinically node-negative (cN0) patients following NAC has yet to be elucidated. This study evaluated the incidence of residual occult pathologic nodal disease after NAC in cN0 breast cancer and associated clinicopathologic risk factors.

Methods: A retrospective study of 249 cN0 patients who received NAC at our institution from 2010-2021 was performed. Clinical and pathologic tumor features were compared between 2 groups: persistent LN- versus LN+ after NAC.

Results: The study group comprised 166 patients: 19 (11.4%) had pathologic LNs positive following NAC. Patients with LN+ (n = 19) versus LN- (n = 147) had greater mean clinical tumor size (P < .01), higher clinical T stage (P < .001), invasive lobular cancer (P < .01), lymphovascular invasion (P 0.01), and ER+ HER2- phenotype (P < .01). Conversely, LN- patients more likely had HER2+ tumors (P < .01) and in-breast pathologic complete response (P < .05). Sentinel LN biopsy (SLNB) obtained a mean of 3.8 LNs with 2 (1.2%) patients having ≥ypN2. At 46 months median follow-up, 1 (0.6%) axillary recurrence occurred.

Conclusions: There is a low incidence of both residual occult disease in the axilla and axillary recurrence in cN0 breast cancer patients following NAC. Many of these patients may avoid axillary surgery, or at a maximum, undergo SLNB alone with low concern for axillary recurrence.

临床淋巴结阴性乳腺癌在新辅助化疗后淋巴结受累的发生率:选择性省略前哨淋巴结活检的理由。
目的:新辅助化疗(NAC)目前被广泛应用于早期乳腺癌。从历史上看,切除腋窝淋巴结(LN)指导了治疗决策并减少了局部复发,但其在NAC后临床淋巴结阴性(cN0)患者中的应用尚未得到阐明。本研究评估了cN0乳腺癌NAC术后残留隐匿性病理淋巴结病的发生率及相关的临床病理危险因素。方法:对我院2010-2021年间249例接受NAC治疗的cN0患者进行回顾性研究。比较两组患者NAC术后持续性LN-和LN+的临床和病理特征。结果:研究组共166例患者,其中19例(11.4%)NAC术后病理ln阳性。LN+ (n = 19)与LN- (n = 147)患者的平均临床肿瘤大小(P < 0.01)、临床T分期(P < 0.001)、浸润性小叶癌(P < 0.01)、淋巴血管浸润(P < 0.01)和ER+ HER2-表型(P < 0.01)更大。相反,LN-患者更可能有HER2+肿瘤(P < 0.01)和乳腺内病理完全缓解(P < 0.05)。前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)平均获得3.8个淋巴结,其中2例(1.2%)患者的ypN2≥。中位随访46个月时,腋窝复发1例(0.6%)。结论:cN0乳腺癌NAC术后腋窝残余隐匿性病变及腋窝复发发生率均较低。这些患者中的许多人可能会避免腋窝手术,或者最多只接受SLNB,而不太担心腋窝复发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical breast cancer
Clinical breast cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
174
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Breast Cancer is a peer-reviewed bimonthly journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research of breast cancer. Clinical Breast Cancer is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of breast cancer. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to breast cancer. Specific areas of interest include clinical research reports from various therapeutic modalities, cancer genetics, drug sensitivity and resistance, novel imaging, tumor genomics, biomarkers, and chemoprevention strategies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信