Correction to “Usefulness of simplified comprehensive geriatric assessment as a pre-ERCP screening for the elderly”

IF 2.8 3区医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY

Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences Pub Date : 2025-05-05 DOI:10.1002/jhbp.12125

{"title":"Correction to “Usefulness of simplified comprehensive geriatric assessment as a pre-ERCP screening for the elderly”","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/jhbp.12125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nomura S, Saito K,Fujisawa M, Kitahara M, Kuniyoshi N, Imazu H,et al. Usefulness of simplified comprehensivegeriatric assessment as a pre-ERCP screening for theelderly. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2025;32:246–253. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.120933.2.2 ERCP outcomes sectionThe text “Univariate and multivariate analyses identified elderly (HR 1.22 [95% CI: 0.99–1.49], p = .06), malignant tumor (HR 1.79 [95% CI: 1.43–2.23], p < .01), emergent ERCP (HR 1.76 [95% CI: 1.40–2.24], p < .01), and adverse events (HR 1.99 [95% CI: 1.40–2.54], p < .01) as independent risk factors for prolonged hospital stay (Table 7).” was incorrect. This should have read: “Univariate and multivariate analyses identified malignant tumor (HR 1.79 [95% CI: 1.43–2.23], p < .01), emergent ERCP (HR 1.76 [95% CI: 1.40–2.24], p < .01), and adverse events (HR 1.99 [95% CI: 1.40–2.54], p < .01) as independent risk factors for prolonged hospital stay (Table 7).”4 DISCUSSIONThe text “Univariate and multivariate analyses across all age groups identified significant factors impacting the length of hospital stay, including being elderly, having a malignancy, and undergoing emergent ERCP.” was incorrect. This should have read: “Univariate and multivariate analyses across all age groups identified significant factors impacting the length of hospital stay, including having a malignancy, undergoing emergent ERCP, and experiencing adverse events.”We apologize for this error.","PeriodicalId":16056,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences","volume":"32 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jhbp.12125","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jhbp.12125","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nomura S, Saito K,Fujisawa M, Kitahara M, Kuniyoshi N, Imazu H,et al. Usefulness of simplified comprehensivegeriatric assessment as a pre-ERCP screening for theelderly. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2025;32:246–253. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.12093

3.2.2 ERCP outcomes section

The text “Univariate and multivariate analyses identified elderly (HR 1.22 [95% CI: 0.99–1.49], p = .06), malignant tumor (HR 1.79 [95% CI: 1.43–2.23], p < .01), emergent ERCP (HR 1.76 [95% CI: 1.40–2.24], p < .01), and adverse events (HR 1.99 [95% CI: 1.40–2.54], p < .01) as independent risk factors for prolonged hospital stay (Table 7).” was incorrect. This should have read: “Univariate and multivariate analyses identified malignant tumor (HR 1.79 [95% CI: 1.43–2.23], p < .01), emergent ERCP (HR 1.76 [95% CI: 1.40–2.24], p < .01), and adverse events (HR 1.99 [95% CI: 1.40–2.54], p < .01) as independent risk factors for prolonged hospital stay (Table 7).”

4 DISCUSSION

The text “Univariate and multivariate analyses across all age groups identified significant factors impacting the length of hospital stay, including being elderly, having a malignancy, and undergoing emergent ERCP.” was incorrect. This should have read: “Univariate and multivariate analyses across all age groups identified significant factors impacting the length of hospital stay, including having a malignancy, undergoing emergent ERCP, and experiencing adverse events.”

We apologize for this error.

查看原文本刊更多论文

更正“简化综合老年病评估作为ercp前老年人筛查的有用性”。

Nomura S, Saito K,Fujisawa M, Kitahara M, Kuniyoshi N, Imazu H，等。简化的综合老年病学评估作为ercp前筛查的有效性。[J]中华肝胆胰脏杂志，2015;32(2):246 - 253。https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.120933.2.2 ERCP结局部分文本“单因素和多因素分析确定老年人（HR 1.22 [95% CI: 0.99-1.49], p = 0.06）、恶性肿瘤（HR 1.79 [95% CI: 1.43-2.23], p < 0.01）、紧急ERCP （HR 1.76 [95% CI: 1.40-2.24], p < 0.01）是延长住院时间的独立危险因素（表7）”是不正确的。应该是这样的：“单因素和多因素分析确定了恶性肿瘤（危险度1.79 [95% CI: 1.43-2.23], p < 01），突发ERCP（危险度1.76 [95% CI: 1.40-2.24], p < 01）和不良事件(危险度1.99 [95% CI：[1.40-2.54], p < .01])是延长住院时间的独立危险因素（表7）。“4讨论”对所有年龄组的单因素和多因素分析确定了影响住院时间的重要因素，包括老年、恶性肿瘤和紧急ERCP。是不正确的。这应该是：“对所有年龄组的单因素和多因素分析确定了影响住院时间的重要因素，包括患有恶性肿瘤、接受紧急ERCP和经历不良事件。”我们为这个错误道歉。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-SURGERY

自引率

10.00%

发文量

178

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： The Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences (JHBPS) is the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences. JHBPS publishes articles dealing with clinical research as well as translational research on all aspects of this field. Coverage includes Original Article, Review Article, Images of Interest, Rapid Communication and an announcement section. Letters to the Editor and comments on the journal’s policies or content are also included. JHBPS welcomes submissions from surgeons, physicians, endoscopists, radiologists, oncologists, and pathologists.