Rate of cross-commodity discounting of substances varies by substance type for individuals in recovery from substance use disorders.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Anthony N Nist, Daniel A R Cabral, Shuangshuang Xu, Allison N Tegge, Warren K Bickel
{"title":"Rate of cross-commodity discounting of substances varies by substance type for individuals in recovery from substance use disorders.","authors":"Anthony N Nist, Daniel A R Cabral, Shuangshuang Xu, Allison N Tegge, Warren K Bickel","doi":"10.1037/pha0000780","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The extant literature hints at the existence of substance-specific differences in rates of cross-commodity discounting (CCT). However, direct examinations are currently lacking. The present experiment aimed to replicate previous studies examining CCT of substances and to extend their findings by examining potential substance-specific relationships with discounting. Participants (<i>n</i> = 122) on recovery pathways from substance use disorders indicated the substances they were still actively using and then ranked these substances from most to least preferred. Participants then completed four discounting tasks: (a) money now-money later, (b) money now-drug later, (c) drug now-drug later, and (d) drug now-money later. Monetary and drug amounts were always equated. In these tasks, the drug commodity was always the participant's most preferred except if participants indicated they used multiple substances, in which case they completed additional discounting tasks with their second most preferred substance. Results revealed that discounting rates across substances did not differ significantly in conditions where the same commodity was both the immediate and the delayed option. In contrast, in the drug now-money later condition, we found that rates of discounting varied significantly according to the specific drug commodity. Further, this relationship was inverted in the money now-drug later condition. Overall, results from previous examinations of the CCT of alcohol and stimulants were replicated. In addition, we provide the first direct evidence that rates of CCT may differ across different substances. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":12089,"journal":{"name":"Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pha0000780","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The extant literature hints at the existence of substance-specific differences in rates of cross-commodity discounting (CCT). However, direct examinations are currently lacking. The present experiment aimed to replicate previous studies examining CCT of substances and to extend their findings by examining potential substance-specific relationships with discounting. Participants (n = 122) on recovery pathways from substance use disorders indicated the substances they were still actively using and then ranked these substances from most to least preferred. Participants then completed four discounting tasks: (a) money now-money later, (b) money now-drug later, (c) drug now-drug later, and (d) drug now-money later. Monetary and drug amounts were always equated. In these tasks, the drug commodity was always the participant's most preferred except if participants indicated they used multiple substances, in which case they completed additional discounting tasks with their second most preferred substance. Results revealed that discounting rates across substances did not differ significantly in conditions where the same commodity was both the immediate and the delayed option. In contrast, in the drug now-money later condition, we found that rates of discounting varied significantly according to the specific drug commodity. Further, this relationship was inverted in the money now-drug later condition. Overall, results from previous examinations of the CCT of alcohol and stimulants were replicated. In addition, we provide the first direct evidence that rates of CCT may differ across different substances. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

对于从物质使用障碍中恢复的个体,物质的跨商品折扣率因物质类型而异。
现有的文献暗示,存在物质特异性差异的跨商品折扣率(CCT)。然而,目前还缺乏直接考试。本实验旨在复制以前的研究,检查物质的CCT,并通过检查与折扣的潜在物质特异性关系来扩展他们的发现。从物质使用障碍中恢复途径的参与者(n = 122)指出他们仍在积极使用的物质,然后将这些物质从最喜欢到最不喜欢排序。然后,参与者完成了四项折扣任务:(a)先给钱再给钱,(b)先给钱再给药,(c)先给药再给药,(d)先给药再给钱。货币和毒品的数量总是相等的。在这些任务中,药品总是参与者最喜欢的商品,除非参与者表示他们使用多种物质,在这种情况下,他们用第二喜欢的物质完成了额外的折扣任务。结果显示,在同一商品既是即时选项又是延迟选项的情况下,不同物质的贴现率没有显着差异。相比之下,在药物先钱后钱的条件下,我们发现折扣率根据具体的药物商品有显著差异。此外,这种关系在“先钱后药”的条件下被颠倒了。总的来说,先前对酒精和兴奋剂的CCT检查的结果是重复的。此外,我们提供了第一个直接证据,证明不同物质的CCT速率可能不同。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
164
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology publishes advances in translational and interdisciplinary research on psychopharmacology, broadly defined, and/or substance abuse.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信