Efficacy of a four-drug combined regimen compared to uterine curettage in the treatment of incomplete medical abortion: a prospective observational study.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Yanlin Feng, Linai Zhang
{"title":"Efficacy of a four-drug combined regimen compared to uterine curettage in the treatment of incomplete medical abortion: a prospective observational study.","authors":"Yanlin Feng, Linai Zhang","doi":"10.1186/s41043-025-00771-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the clinical efficacy of the combined regimen of four drugs (drospirenone and ethinylestradiol tablets (II), mifepristone, misoprostol, and Xinshenghua granules) for the treatment of incomplete medical abortion (MA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>184 patients diagnosed with incomplete MA were recruited and divided into two groups: the combined medication group (n = 92) and the uterine curettage group (n = 92). Patients in the combined medication group were treated with a combined regimen of four drugs, while those in the uterine curettage group were treated with uterine curettage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After treatment, the diameter of residue (0.00 VS 4.26 ± 2.34 mm, t=-3.359, P = 0.010), days of vaginal bleeding (9.79 ± 1.76 VS 11.92 ± 1.91 days, t=-4.688, P = 0.010) and return time of menses (28.58 ± 2.67 VS 31.24 ± 2.43 days, t=-4.238, P < 0.001) of the combined medication group were significantly lower than those of the uterine curettage group. The duration of menstruation (6.12 ± 1.12 VS 5.11 ± 0.98 days, t=-2.681, P = 0.007) and the proportion of menstrual volume equal to past menstruation after return of menses were higher in the combined medication group than in the uterine curettage group (80.43% VS 57.61%, χ<sup>2</sup> = 16.472, P < 0.001). No statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of serum β-HCG levels after treatment (P > 0.05); the overall response rate was higher in the combined medication group than in the uterine curettage group (97.83% VS 80.43%, χ<sup>2</sup> = 54.331, P < 0.001). No adverse reaction events occurred during the treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combined regimen of four drugs boasts favorable efficacy for the treatment of incomplete MA, and is equally efficient as compared to uterine curettage.</p>","PeriodicalId":15969,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition","volume":"44 1","pages":"111"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11983879/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41043-025-00771-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the clinical efficacy of the combined regimen of four drugs (drospirenone and ethinylestradiol tablets (II), mifepristone, misoprostol, and Xinshenghua granules) for the treatment of incomplete medical abortion (MA).

Methods: 184 patients diagnosed with incomplete MA were recruited and divided into two groups: the combined medication group (n = 92) and the uterine curettage group (n = 92). Patients in the combined medication group were treated with a combined regimen of four drugs, while those in the uterine curettage group were treated with uterine curettage.

Results: After treatment, the diameter of residue (0.00 VS 4.26 ± 2.34 mm, t=-3.359, P = 0.010), days of vaginal bleeding (9.79 ± 1.76 VS 11.92 ± 1.91 days, t=-4.688, P = 0.010) and return time of menses (28.58 ± 2.67 VS 31.24 ± 2.43 days, t=-4.238, P < 0.001) of the combined medication group were significantly lower than those of the uterine curettage group. The duration of menstruation (6.12 ± 1.12 VS 5.11 ± 0.98 days, t=-2.681, P = 0.007) and the proportion of menstrual volume equal to past menstruation after return of menses were higher in the combined medication group than in the uterine curettage group (80.43% VS 57.61%, χ2 = 16.472, P < 0.001). No statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of serum β-HCG levels after treatment (P > 0.05); the overall response rate was higher in the combined medication group than in the uterine curettage group (97.83% VS 80.43%, χ2 = 54.331, P < 0.001). No adverse reaction events occurred during the treatment.

Conclusion: The combined regimen of four drugs boasts favorable efficacy for the treatment of incomplete MA, and is equally efficient as compared to uterine curettage.

四药联合方案与子宫刮除治疗不完全药物流产的疗效比较:一项前瞻性观察研究。
目的:探讨四种药物(屈螺酮炔雌醇片(II)、米非司酮、米索前列醇、心生花颗粒)联合治疗不完全性药物流产(MA)的临床疗效。方法:招募184例诊断为不完全子宫内膜炎的患者,分为联合用药组(n = 92)和刮宫组(n = 92)。联合用药组采用四种药物联合治疗方案,子宫刮除组采用子宫刮除治疗。结果:治疗后阴道残余直径(0.00 VS 4.26±2.34 mm, t=-3.359, P = 0.010)、阴道出血天数(9.79±1.76 VS 11.92±1.91 d, t=-4.688, P = 0.010)、月经恢复时间(28.58±2.67 VS 31.24±2.43 d, t=-4.238, P = 16.472, P = 0.05);联合用药组总有效率高于子宫刮除组(97.83% VS 80.43%, χ2 = 54.331, P)。结论:四药联合治疗不完全性MA疗效良好,与子宫刮除效果相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition
Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition brings together research on all aspects of issues related to population, nutrition and health. The journal publishes articles across a broad range of topics including global health, maternal and child health, nutrition, common illnesses and determinants of population health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信