CLINICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF HIP SUBGROUPS IN GERIATRIC CHRONIC LOW BACK PAIN.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Jenifer M Pugliese, J Megan Sions, Patrick J Knox, Ryan T Pohlig, Gregory E Hicks
{"title":"CLINICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF HIP SUBGROUPS IN GERIATRIC CHRONIC LOW BACK PAIN.","authors":"Jenifer M Pugliese, J Megan Sions, Patrick J Knox, Ryan T Pohlig, Gregory E Hicks","doi":"10.1016/j.apmr.2025.04.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate and compare the clinical profiles of three previously established hip-based subgroups of older adults with chronic low back pain (LBP) using data from multiple domains.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional analysis of baseline cohort study data.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Clinical Research Laboratory.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>250 Community dwelling older adults with chronic LBP.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Not applicable.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Clinical profiles of the previously derived subgroups were established. Pain quality and dispersion were captured with the McGill Pain Questionnaire. Self-efficacy was measured using the Low Back Activity Confidence Scale. Catastrophic thoughts about LBP were captured with the Pain Catastrophizing Scale. Trunk mobility was measured with an inclinometer. Trunk muscle function was captured through standardized muscle endurance testing and ultrasound measures of muscle activity. One-way analysis of variance was used to analyze between-group differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Each chronic LBP subgroup was named based on the level of hip strength and hip symptoms: weak/symptomatic (WS), weak/non-symptomatic (WNS) and strong/non-symptomatic (SNS). The WS subgroup had distinctly worse levels of pain quality, dispersion, catastrophizing and self-efficacy, compared to the other two subgroups. In contrast, the SNS subgroup, as compared to the other subgroups, had greater thoracolumbar flexion, greater trunk muscle endurance and better psychological profiles.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The unique clinical profile of each subgroup underscores how important it is to consider the heterogeneous nature of chronic LBP in the geriatric population when developing treatment approaches. The clinical characterization of these subgroups across multiple rehabilitation-focused domains may optimize the development of tailored interventions for each subgroup.</p>","PeriodicalId":8313,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2025.04.018","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate and compare the clinical profiles of three previously established hip-based subgroups of older adults with chronic low back pain (LBP) using data from multiple domains.

Design: Cross-sectional analysis of baseline cohort study data.

Setting: Clinical Research Laboratory.

Participants: 250 Community dwelling older adults with chronic LBP.

Interventions: Not applicable.

Main outcome measures: Clinical profiles of the previously derived subgroups were established. Pain quality and dispersion were captured with the McGill Pain Questionnaire. Self-efficacy was measured using the Low Back Activity Confidence Scale. Catastrophic thoughts about LBP were captured with the Pain Catastrophizing Scale. Trunk mobility was measured with an inclinometer. Trunk muscle function was captured through standardized muscle endurance testing and ultrasound measures of muscle activity. One-way analysis of variance was used to analyze between-group differences.

Results: Each chronic LBP subgroup was named based on the level of hip strength and hip symptoms: weak/symptomatic (WS), weak/non-symptomatic (WNS) and strong/non-symptomatic (SNS). The WS subgroup had distinctly worse levels of pain quality, dispersion, catastrophizing and self-efficacy, compared to the other two subgroups. In contrast, the SNS subgroup, as compared to the other subgroups, had greater thoracolumbar flexion, greater trunk muscle endurance and better psychological profiles.

Conclusion: The unique clinical profile of each subgroup underscores how important it is to consider the heterogeneous nature of chronic LBP in the geriatric population when developing treatment approaches. The clinical characterization of these subgroups across multiple rehabilitation-focused domains may optimize the development of tailored interventions for each subgroup.

老年慢性腰痛髋部亚群的临床特征。
目的:利用来自多个领域的数据,调查和比较三个先前建立的基于髋关节的老年慢性腰痛(LBP)亚组的临床概况。设计:基线队列研究数据的横断面分析。单位:临床研究实验室。参与者:250名社区居住的慢性下腰痛老年人。干预措施:不适用。主要结果测量:建立了先前衍生亚组的临床概况。用McGill疼痛问卷记录疼痛质量和分散度。自我效能用腰背活动信心量表测量。关于腰痛的灾难性想法用疼痛灾难性量表来记录。用倾斜仪测量躯干活动度。通过标准化肌肉耐力测试和超声测量肌肉活动来捕获躯干肌肉功能。组间差异分析采用单因素方差分析。结果:每个慢性腰痛亚组根据髋关节力量和髋关节症状的水平命名:弱/有症状(WS)、弱/无症状(WNS)和强/无症状(SNS)。与其他两个亚组相比,WS亚组的疼痛质量、离散度、灾难化和自我效能感水平明显较差。相比之下,SNS亚组与其他亚组相比,有更大的胸腰椎屈曲,更大的躯干肌肉耐力和更好的心理特征。结论:每个亚组的独特临床特征强调了在制定治疗方法时考虑老年人群慢性腰痛异质性的重要性。这些亚组跨越多个康复重点领域的临床特征可以优化每个亚组量身定制的干预措施的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.70%
发文量
495
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation publishes original, peer-reviewed research and clinical reports on important trends and developments in physical medicine and rehabilitation and related fields. This international journal brings researchers and clinicians authoritative information on the therapeutic utilization of physical, behavioral and pharmaceutical agents in providing comprehensive care for individuals with chronic illness and disabilities. Archives began publication in 1920, publishes monthly, and is the official journal of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Its papers are cited more often than any other rehabilitation journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信