Annette K Regan, Honorine Uwimana, Stacey L Rowe, Elizabeth Jitka Olsanska, Brianna Agnew, Eliana Castillo, Alice Fiddian-Green, Michelle L Giles
{"title":"Systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions to increase the uptake of vaccines recommended during pregnancy.","authors":"Annette K Regan, Honorine Uwimana, Stacey L Rowe, Elizabeth Jitka Olsanska, Brianna Agnew, Eliana Castillo, Alice Fiddian-Green, Michelle L Giles","doi":"10.1038/s41541-025-01120-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although immunization during pregnancy can protect mothers and their infants from vaccine-preventable morbidity and mortality, vaccination rates are often poor. We systematically reviewed the literature from inception to July 4, 2023, for randomized and non-randomized quasi-experimental studies estimating the effects of interventions to increase vaccination during pregnancy. Of 9331 studies screened, 36 met inclusion criteria, including 18 demand-side interventions, 11 supply-side interventions, and seven multi-level (demand and supply-side) interventions. Demand-side interventions commonly addressed patient education, showing modest improvement (pooled RR 1.18; 95% CI: 1.04, 1.33; I<sup>2</sup> = 63.1%, low certainty). Supply-side interventions commonly implemented Assessment-Feedback-Incentive-eXchange interventions with little improvement (pooled RR 1.13; 95% CI: 0.96, 1.33; I<sup>2</sup> = 94.0%, low certainty). Multi-level interventions were modestly effective in increasing vaccination (pooled RR 1.62; 95% CI: 1.09, 2.42; I<sup>2</sup> = 97%, very low certainty). Interventions identified in the literature mostly resulted in low to moderate increases in vaccination with likely high heterogeneity and low to very low certainty in the findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":19335,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Vaccines","volume":"10 1","pages":"76"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12009365/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Vaccines","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41541-025-01120-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Although immunization during pregnancy can protect mothers and their infants from vaccine-preventable morbidity and mortality, vaccination rates are often poor. We systematically reviewed the literature from inception to July 4, 2023, for randomized and non-randomized quasi-experimental studies estimating the effects of interventions to increase vaccination during pregnancy. Of 9331 studies screened, 36 met inclusion criteria, including 18 demand-side interventions, 11 supply-side interventions, and seven multi-level (demand and supply-side) interventions. Demand-side interventions commonly addressed patient education, showing modest improvement (pooled RR 1.18; 95% CI: 1.04, 1.33; I2 = 63.1%, low certainty). Supply-side interventions commonly implemented Assessment-Feedback-Incentive-eXchange interventions with little improvement (pooled RR 1.13; 95% CI: 0.96, 1.33; I2 = 94.0%, low certainty). Multi-level interventions were modestly effective in increasing vaccination (pooled RR 1.62; 95% CI: 1.09, 2.42; I2 = 97%, very low certainty). Interventions identified in the literature mostly resulted in low to moderate increases in vaccination with likely high heterogeneity and low to very low certainty in the findings.
NPJ VaccinesImmunology and Microbiology-Immunology
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
4.30%
发文量
146
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍:
Online-only and open access, npj Vaccines is dedicated to highlighting the most important scientific advances in vaccine research and development.