Validating an updated protocol for the novel object recognition task in young pigs.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience Pub Date : 2025-03-31 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fnbeh.2025.1480389
Rebecca K Golden, Ryan N Dilger
{"title":"Validating an updated protocol for the novel object recognition task in young pigs.","authors":"Rebecca K Golden, Ryan N Dilger","doi":"10.3389/fnbeh.2025.1480389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this study was to validate equipment and procedures involved in implementing the novel object recognition (NOR) paradigm with young pigs. Two experiments were run with the intent of determining improvements to the original, high-throughput NOR paradigm design. The focus of these experiments was the impact of confounding factors on the main cognitive outcome, recognition index (RI). Experiment 1 utilized 13 pigs that all performed the NOR task following the original paradigm with the addition of 2 extra testing days. Results from this experiment indicated that one test day is sufficient for producing RI values that differ (<i>p</i> < 0.05) from chance performance, which was set at 0.50 given the use of two objects. Results also indicated that pigs may habituate to the task itself after 1 day of testing as RI values were not different (<i>p</i> > 0.05) from that of chance on test days 2 or 3. Experiment 2 utilized 13 male and 16 female pigs to determine sex differences in paradigm outcomes in addition to introducing home-cage enrichment. Results indicated sex differences in investigative behaviors despite both sexes producing RI values different from that of chance. The impact of home-cage enrichment was less discernable, but evidence suggests a lack of influence. Overall, the modifications to the NOR paradigm described herein reduced variability in the primary outcome, RI, and thereby improved sensitivity of the behavioral assay compared with the original paradigm.</p>","PeriodicalId":12368,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience","volume":"19 ","pages":"1480389"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11994583/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2025.1480389","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this study was to validate equipment and procedures involved in implementing the novel object recognition (NOR) paradigm with young pigs. Two experiments were run with the intent of determining improvements to the original, high-throughput NOR paradigm design. The focus of these experiments was the impact of confounding factors on the main cognitive outcome, recognition index (RI). Experiment 1 utilized 13 pigs that all performed the NOR task following the original paradigm with the addition of 2 extra testing days. Results from this experiment indicated that one test day is sufficient for producing RI values that differ (p < 0.05) from chance performance, which was set at 0.50 given the use of two objects. Results also indicated that pigs may habituate to the task itself after 1 day of testing as RI values were not different (p > 0.05) from that of chance on test days 2 or 3. Experiment 2 utilized 13 male and 16 female pigs to determine sex differences in paradigm outcomes in addition to introducing home-cage enrichment. Results indicated sex differences in investigative behaviors despite both sexes producing RI values different from that of chance. The impact of home-cage enrichment was less discernable, but evidence suggests a lack of influence. Overall, the modifications to the NOR paradigm described herein reduced variability in the primary outcome, RI, and thereby improved sensitivity of the behavioral assay compared with the original paradigm.

验证一个更新的协议,为新的目标识别任务在仔猪。
本研究的目的是验证在仔猪身上实施新型目标识别(NOR)范式所涉及的设备和程序。进行了两个实验,目的是确定对原始的高通量NOR范式设计的改进。这些实验的重点是混淆因素对主要认知结果识别指数(RI)的影响。试验1选用13头猪,所有猪均按照原始范式执行NOR任务,并增加了2个额外的测试天。这个实验的结果表明,一个测试日足以产生不同的RI值(p p > 0.05)从测试第2天或第3天的机会。实验2利用13头公猪和16头母猪来确定范式结果的性别差异,并引入家庭笼富集。结果表明,尽管两性产生的RI值不同于偶然性,但调查行为存在性别差异。家庭笼富集的影响不太明显,但证据表明缺乏影响。总的来说,本文所描述的对NOR范式的修改减少了主要结果RI的可变性,从而与原始范式相比提高了行为分析的敏感性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
506
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research that advances our understanding of the neural mechanisms underlying behavior. Field Chief Editor Nuno Sousa at the Instituto de Pesquisa em Ciências da Vida e da Saúde (ICVS) is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. This journal publishes major insights into the neural mechanisms of animal and human behavior, and welcomes articles studying the interplay between behavior and its neurobiological basis at all levels: from molecular biology and genetics, to morphological, biochemical, neurochemical, electrophysiological, neuroendocrine, pharmacological, and neuroimaging studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信