Geographical variation in flower colour of a food-deceptive orchid reflects local pollinator preferences.

IF 3.6 2区 生物学 Q1 PLANT SCIENCES
Steven D Johnson, Timotheüs van der Niet, Ethan Newman, Nina Hobbhahn, Bruce Anderson
{"title":"Geographical variation in flower colour of a food-deceptive orchid reflects local pollinator preferences.","authors":"Steven D Johnson, Timotheüs van der Niet, Ethan Newman, Nina Hobbhahn, Bruce Anderson","doi":"10.1093/aob/mcaf074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Intraspecific variation in floral traits can reflect shifts among different pollinator niches. We investigated whether a geographical mosaic of pollinator niches can explain divergence of flower colour and morphology among populations of Disa porrecta, a food-deceptive orchid in South Africa.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used field observations and pollen load analysis to establish pollinators of D. porrecta and measured spectral reflectance, morphology and scent emissions in populations. We used reciprocal translocation experiments and pairs of artificial inflorescences to establish pollinator foraging preferences. A phylogenetic analysis was used to assess relationships among populations of D. porrecta and related taxa.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We documented two colour forms of D. porrecta that differ in pollinator assemblages. The orange-flowered form in the east of the distribution is pollinated solely by a wide-ranging nymphalid butterfly species. The pink-flowered form in the westernmost part of the distribution is pollinated primarily by a long-proboscid fly species. The orchid's floral spectral reflectance and morphology closely matches that of most nectar plants used by these pollinators, implying a potential role for mimicry. In reciprocal translocations, butterflies showed strong preference for the orange-flowered form of the orchid at sites in the east, while both long-proboscid flies and butterflies showed a preference for the pink-flowered form at sites in the west. These preferences were also evident in experiments involving pairs of artificial inflorescences that varied only in colour. Phylogenetic analysis showed that the two colour forms of Disa porrecta share an immediate common ancestor, but the direction of the colour shift could not be reliably reconstructed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study identifies a role for a geographical mosaic of nectar plants and pollinators in the divergence of floral traits in D. porrecta. Differences in flower colour among populations of this orchid species are strongly correlated with pollinator foraging preferences.</p>","PeriodicalId":8023,"journal":{"name":"Annals of botany","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of botany","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcaf074","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Intraspecific variation in floral traits can reflect shifts among different pollinator niches. We investigated whether a geographical mosaic of pollinator niches can explain divergence of flower colour and morphology among populations of Disa porrecta, a food-deceptive orchid in South Africa.

Methods: We used field observations and pollen load analysis to establish pollinators of D. porrecta and measured spectral reflectance, morphology and scent emissions in populations. We used reciprocal translocation experiments and pairs of artificial inflorescences to establish pollinator foraging preferences. A phylogenetic analysis was used to assess relationships among populations of D. porrecta and related taxa.

Results: We documented two colour forms of D. porrecta that differ in pollinator assemblages. The orange-flowered form in the east of the distribution is pollinated solely by a wide-ranging nymphalid butterfly species. The pink-flowered form in the westernmost part of the distribution is pollinated primarily by a long-proboscid fly species. The orchid's floral spectral reflectance and morphology closely matches that of most nectar plants used by these pollinators, implying a potential role for mimicry. In reciprocal translocations, butterflies showed strong preference for the orange-flowered form of the orchid at sites in the east, while both long-proboscid flies and butterflies showed a preference for the pink-flowered form at sites in the west. These preferences were also evident in experiments involving pairs of artificial inflorescences that varied only in colour. Phylogenetic analysis showed that the two colour forms of Disa porrecta share an immediate common ancestor, but the direction of the colour shift could not be reliably reconstructed.

Conclusion: This study identifies a role for a geographical mosaic of nectar plants and pollinators in the divergence of floral traits in D. porrecta. Differences in flower colour among populations of this orchid species are strongly correlated with pollinator foraging preferences.

一种食物欺骗兰花的颜色在地理上的变化反映了当地传粉者的偏好。
背景与目的:花性状的种内变异可以反映不同传粉者生态位的变化。我们研究了传粉者生态位的地理马赛克是否可以解释南非一种食物欺骗兰花Disa porrecta种群之间的颜色和形态差异。方法:采用野外观测和花粉负荷分析的方法,确定花粉传粉媒介,测定种群光谱反射率、形态和气味释放量。本研究采用反向易位实验和对人工花序来确定传粉媒介的觅食偏好。采用系统发育分析的方法,评价了猪蹄草种群与相关分类群之间的亲缘关系。结果:我们记录了花粉传粉者组合不同的两种颜色形式的D. porrecta。在分布的东部,橙色花的形式仅由广泛的雌雄蝴蝶物种授粉。分布最西端的粉红色花朵主要由一种长喙蝇种授粉。兰花的花光谱反射率和形态与这些传粉者使用的大多数花蜜植物非常相似,这意味着它们可能扮演着模仿的角色。在互惠易位中,蝴蝶在东部的地点对橙色花的兰花表现出强烈的偏好,而长吻蝇和蝴蝶在西部的地点都对粉红色花的兰花表现出偏好。这些偏好在对人工花序的实验中也很明显,这些人工花序只在颜色上有变化。系统发育分析表明,这两种颜色形态有一个直接的共同祖先,但颜色转移的方向不能可靠地重建。结论:本研究确定了花蜜植物和传粉者的地理马赛克在花性状分化中的作用。这种兰花种群之间的花色差异与传粉者的觅食偏好密切相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of botany
Annals of botany 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
138
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Annals of Botany is an international plant science journal publishing novel and rigorous research in all areas of plant science. It is published monthly in both electronic and printed forms with at least two extra issues each year that focus on a particular theme in plant biology. The Journal is managed by the Annals of Botany Company, a not-for-profit educational charity established to promote plant science worldwide. The Journal publishes original research papers, invited and submitted review articles, ''Research in Context'' expanding on original work, ''Botanical Briefings'' as short overviews of important topics, and ''Viewpoints'' giving opinions. All papers in each issue are summarized briefly in Content Snapshots , there are topical news items in the Plant Cuttings section and Book Reviews . A rigorous review process ensures that readers are exposed to genuine and novel advances across a wide spectrum of botanical knowledge. All papers aim to advance knowledge and make a difference to our understanding of plant science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信