The diagnostic role of FNA based on clinicopathological features in thyroid malignancy.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Mohammad Mehdi Fallahi, Sepehr Koulaian, Parviz Mardani, Seyed Ali Malekhosseini, Reza Shahriarirad
{"title":"The diagnostic role of FNA based on clinicopathological features in thyroid malignancy.","authors":"Mohammad Mehdi Fallahi, Sepehr Koulaian, Parviz Mardani, Seyed Ali Malekhosseini, Reza Shahriarirad","doi":"10.1186/s12902-025-01945-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Thyroid nodules are mostly benign lesions within the thyroid, with a small percentage being malignant. The decision for surgery is mainly based on the fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology report, which is categorized into six categories from non-diagnostic to malignant. The accuracy of FNA is of utmost importance to minimize the complications due to misdiagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a retrospective study, we analyzed 310 patients who underwent thyroidectomy due to suspicious thyroid nodules with both FNA and histopathological results. We reviewed patient files, extracting demographic data, FNA results, and final histopathology reports and grouped them based on the size of the nodules. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average age of the patients was 42.9 ± 13.2 years, and the average size of the largest nodule diameter was 2.1 ± 1.89 cm. Histopathological evaluation of specimens obtained during surgery showed that 184 (59.4%) samples were malignant and 126 (40.6%) were non-malignant. The overall specificity was 96.8%, and the sensitivity was 89.6%, and the accuracy of FNA in diagnosing malignancy was 92.2%. Logistic regression analysis revealed that Bethesda classification (OR: 2.34; 95%CI: 1.73-3.16; P < 0.001), and also tumor size (OR: 2.02; 95%CI: 1.32-3.10; P = 0.001) exhibited a significant direct correlation with the capability of FNA in accurately diagnosing malignancy. The highest FNA accuracy of malignancy detection was among nodules above 3 cm (97.1%) while in nodules smaller than 1 cm the accuracy was 73.2%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FNA is a suitable diagnostic tool for detecting malignant nodules, while diagnostic capability varies with approaches to indeterminate FNA results. False positive and negative rates are crucial, with challenges in diagnosing malignancy in the context of multinodular goiter cases and smaller nodules.</p>","PeriodicalId":9152,"journal":{"name":"BMC Endocrine Disorders","volume":"25 1","pages":"119"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12034144/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Endocrine Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-025-01945-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Thyroid nodules are mostly benign lesions within the thyroid, with a small percentage being malignant. The decision for surgery is mainly based on the fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology report, which is categorized into six categories from non-diagnostic to malignant. The accuracy of FNA is of utmost importance to minimize the complications due to misdiagnosis.

Methods: In a retrospective study, we analyzed 310 patients who underwent thyroidectomy due to suspicious thyroid nodules with both FNA and histopathological results. We reviewed patient files, extracting demographic data, FNA results, and final histopathology reports and grouped them based on the size of the nodules. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were calculated.

Results: The average age of the patients was 42.9 ± 13.2 years, and the average size of the largest nodule diameter was 2.1 ± 1.89 cm. Histopathological evaluation of specimens obtained during surgery showed that 184 (59.4%) samples were malignant and 126 (40.6%) were non-malignant. The overall specificity was 96.8%, and the sensitivity was 89.6%, and the accuracy of FNA in diagnosing malignancy was 92.2%. Logistic regression analysis revealed that Bethesda classification (OR: 2.34; 95%CI: 1.73-3.16; P < 0.001), and also tumor size (OR: 2.02; 95%CI: 1.32-3.10; P = 0.001) exhibited a significant direct correlation with the capability of FNA in accurately diagnosing malignancy. The highest FNA accuracy of malignancy detection was among nodules above 3 cm (97.1%) while in nodules smaller than 1 cm the accuracy was 73.2%.

Conclusion: FNA is a suitable diagnostic tool for detecting malignant nodules, while diagnostic capability varies with approaches to indeterminate FNA results. False positive and negative rates are crucial, with challenges in diagnosing malignancy in the context of multinodular goiter cases and smaller nodules.

基于临床病理特征的FNA在甲状腺恶性肿瘤中的诊断作用。
背景:甲状腺结节多为良性病变,小部分为恶性病变。手术的决定主要基于细针抽吸(FNA)细胞学报告,从无诊断到恶性分为六类。FNA的准确性对于减少误诊并发症至关重要。方法:在一项回顾性研究中,我们分析了310例因可疑甲状腺结节而行甲状腺切除术的患者的FNA和组织病理学结果。我们回顾了患者档案,提取了人口统计数据、FNA结果和最终的组织病理学报告,并根据结节的大小对其进行了分组。计算敏感性、特异性和预测值。结果:患者平均年龄42.9±13.2岁,最大结节直径平均大小2.1±1.89 cm。术中标本的组织病理学评价显示184例(59.4%)为恶性,126例(40.6%)为非恶性。FNA诊断恶性肿瘤的总特异性为96.8%,敏感性为89.6%,准确率为92.2%。Logistic回归分析显示Bethesda分类(OR: 2.34;95%置信区间:1.73—-3.16;结论:FNA是检测恶性结节的合适诊断工具,但由于FNA结果不确定,诊断能力随方法的不同而不同。假阳性和阴性率是至关重要的,在多结节性甲状腺肿病例和小结节诊断恶性肿瘤的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Endocrine Disorders
BMC Endocrine Disorders ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
280
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Endocrine Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of endocrine disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信