Long-term outcome of radiation therapy for locoregional recurrence of upper tract urothelial carcinoma after nephroureterectomy.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Ho-Hsiang Chang, Hao-Lun Luo, Yu-Li Su, Fu-Min Fang, Chong-Jong Wang, Chun-Chieh Huang
{"title":"Long-term outcome of radiation therapy for locoregional recurrence of upper tract urothelial carcinoma after nephroureterectomy.","authors":"Ho-Hsiang Chang, Hao-Lun Luo, Yu-Li Su, Fu-Min Fang, Chong-Jong Wang, Chun-Chieh Huang","doi":"10.1186/s12894-025-01766-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The objective was to evaluate the survival outcomes associated with radiation therapy (RT) in cases of postoperative locoregional recurrence of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) following radical nephroureterectomy (RNU).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 30 patients undergoing RT for local or regional recurrence of UTUC after RNU from 2002 to 2017 were enrolled. The median follow-up time for patients who survived was 5.9 years. The application of RT comprised two intents: (1) salvage RT for patients who did not respond to chemotherapy or who did not receive chemotherapy, and (2) consolidation RT for patients who showed complete or partial response to chemotherapy. Overall survival (OS) since recurrence, locoregional progression-free survival (LRPFS) after RT, and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) after RT were evaluated. Univariate Cox regression analysis was applied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median OS since recurrence was 40.0 months, and the 5-year OS, LRPFS, and DMFS rates were 46.6%, 45.0%, and 36.7%, respectively. For 14 patients who underwent salvage RT, the 5-year OS, LRPFS, and DMFS rates were 28.6%, 21.4%, and 21.4%, respectively; for 16 patients undergoing consolidation RT, those rates were 63.5%, 65.8%, and 50.0%, respectively. In univariate analysis, consolidation RT and primary site in the ureter were significant prognostic factors for better OS and LRPFS; an age ≤ 60.0 years was also a significant factor for OS. There was no significant factor for DMFS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The patients undergoing RT for postoperative locoregional recurrence of UTUC had promising survival outcomes. Future prospective randomized trials to verify the findings are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":9285,"journal":{"name":"BMC Urology","volume":"25 1","pages":"80"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11980227/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-025-01766-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The objective was to evaluate the survival outcomes associated with radiation therapy (RT) in cases of postoperative locoregional recurrence of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) following radical nephroureterectomy (RNU).

Methods: A total of 30 patients undergoing RT for local or regional recurrence of UTUC after RNU from 2002 to 2017 were enrolled. The median follow-up time for patients who survived was 5.9 years. The application of RT comprised two intents: (1) salvage RT for patients who did not respond to chemotherapy or who did not receive chemotherapy, and (2) consolidation RT for patients who showed complete or partial response to chemotherapy. Overall survival (OS) since recurrence, locoregional progression-free survival (LRPFS) after RT, and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) after RT were evaluated. Univariate Cox regression analysis was applied.

Results: The median OS since recurrence was 40.0 months, and the 5-year OS, LRPFS, and DMFS rates were 46.6%, 45.0%, and 36.7%, respectively. For 14 patients who underwent salvage RT, the 5-year OS, LRPFS, and DMFS rates were 28.6%, 21.4%, and 21.4%, respectively; for 16 patients undergoing consolidation RT, those rates were 63.5%, 65.8%, and 50.0%, respectively. In univariate analysis, consolidation RT and primary site in the ureter were significant prognostic factors for better OS and LRPFS; an age ≤ 60.0 years was also a significant factor for OS. There was no significant factor for DMFS.

Conclusions: The patients undergoing RT for postoperative locoregional recurrence of UTUC had promising survival outcomes. Future prospective randomized trials to verify the findings are needed.

肾输尿管切除术后上尿路上皮癌局部复发放射治疗的远期疗效。
背景:目的是评估放射治疗(RT)在根治性肾输尿管切除术(RNU)后上尿路上皮癌(UTUC)术后局部复发病例中的生存结果。方法:入选2002 - 2017年30例RNU术后局部或区域复发的UTUC患者。存活患者的中位随访时间为5.9年。放疗的应用包括两个目的:(1)对化疗无反应或未接受化疗的患者进行补救性放疗,(2)对化疗完全或部分反应的患者进行巩固性放疗。评估复发后总生存期(OS)、局部无进展生存期(LRPFS)和远处无转移生存期(DMFS)。采用单因素Cox回归分析。结果:复发后中位OS为40.0个月,5年OS、LRPFS和DMFS分别为46.6%、45.0%和36.7%。对于14例接受补救性放疗的患者,5年OS、LRPFS和DMFS率分别为28.6%、21.4%和21.4%;在16例接受巩固性放疗的患者中,这一比例分别为63.5%、65.8%和50.0%。在单因素分析中,巩固RT和输尿管原发部位是改善OS和LRPFS的重要预后因素;年龄≤60.0岁也是影响OS的重要因素。DMFS无显著性影响因素。结论:UTUC术后局部复发患者接受RT治疗,生存期较好。需要未来的前瞻性随机试验来验证这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Urology
BMC Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
177
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Urology is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of urological disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. The journal considers manuscripts in the following broad subject-specific sections of urology: Endourology and technology Epidemiology and health outcomes Pediatric urology Pre-clinical and basic research Reconstructive urology Sexual function and fertility Urological imaging Urological oncology Voiding dysfunction Case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信