Differences in chest imaging between Omicron and non-Omicron coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Yingying Han, Zhijia Wang, Xingzhao Li, Zhuan Zhong
{"title":"Differences in chest imaging between Omicron and non-Omicron coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Yingying Han, Zhijia Wang, Xingzhao Li, Zhuan Zhong","doi":"10.1186/s12879-025-11032-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have posed a great threat to human health. We carried out this systematic review and meta-analysis for two objectives. First, to evaluate the differences in lung infection between the Omicron variants and the non-Omicron strains by chest computed tomography (CT); second, to evaluate the differences in chest CT features between COVID-19 patients with the Omicron variants and those with non-Omicron strains in CT-positive cases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and China National Knowledge Infrastructure for articles and performed a meta-analysis using Stata 14.0 with a random effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our study included a total of 8126 patients with COVID-19, 4113 with the Omicron variants, and 4013 with non-Omicron strains. Patients with the Omicron variants were less likely to be CT-positive (OR = 0.14, 95% CI: 0.08-0.25), and further analysis among CT-positive patients was performed. Compared with the CT images of patients with non-Omicron strains, those of patients with the Omicron variants showed atypical pulmonary features (OR = 4.02, 95% CI: 2.31-6.98). Moreover, patients with the Omicron variants typically had lesions that were mainly located in the center of the lung (OR = 4.51, 95% CI: 1.38-14.76) and in a single lobe (OR = 1.72, 95% CI: 1.10-2.70). The patients with the Omicron variants were less likely to have lesions in both lungs (OR = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.15-0.69), more likely to have bronchial wall thickening (OR = 1.99, 95% CI: 1.05-3.77) and less likely to have the crazy-paving pattern (OR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.33-0.81), linear opacity (OR = 0.26, 95% CI: 0.12-0.60), and vascular enlargement (OR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.35-0.84).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Through meta-analysis, which yields the highest level of evidence for evidence-based medicine, we further confirmed that there were significant differences in the distribution and manifestations of lesions between patients with non-Omicron strains and those with the Omicron variants on chest CT. The variation in SARS-CoV-2 has never stopped. Our findings are useful for the diagnosis and treatment of new SARS-CoV-2 variants that may appear in the future and provide a basis for public health decision-making.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>CRD42024581869.</p>","PeriodicalId":8981,"journal":{"name":"BMC Infectious Diseases","volume":"25 1","pages":"631"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12042635/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-025-11032-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have posed a great threat to human health. We carried out this systematic review and meta-analysis for two objectives. First, to evaluate the differences in lung infection between the Omicron variants and the non-Omicron strains by chest computed tomography (CT); second, to evaluate the differences in chest CT features between COVID-19 patients with the Omicron variants and those with non-Omicron strains in CT-positive cases.

Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and China National Knowledge Infrastructure for articles and performed a meta-analysis using Stata 14.0 with a random effects model.

Results: Our study included a total of 8126 patients with COVID-19, 4113 with the Omicron variants, and 4013 with non-Omicron strains. Patients with the Omicron variants were less likely to be CT-positive (OR = 0.14, 95% CI: 0.08-0.25), and further analysis among CT-positive patients was performed. Compared with the CT images of patients with non-Omicron strains, those of patients with the Omicron variants showed atypical pulmonary features (OR = 4.02, 95% CI: 2.31-6.98). Moreover, patients with the Omicron variants typically had lesions that were mainly located in the center of the lung (OR = 4.51, 95% CI: 1.38-14.76) and in a single lobe (OR = 1.72, 95% CI: 1.10-2.70). The patients with the Omicron variants were less likely to have lesions in both lungs (OR = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.15-0.69), more likely to have bronchial wall thickening (OR = 1.99, 95% CI: 1.05-3.77) and less likely to have the crazy-paving pattern (OR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.33-0.81), linear opacity (OR = 0.26, 95% CI: 0.12-0.60), and vascular enlargement (OR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.35-0.84).

Conclusions: Through meta-analysis, which yields the highest level of evidence for evidence-based medicine, we further confirmed that there were significant differences in the distribution and manifestations of lesions between patients with non-Omicron strains and those with the Omicron variants on chest CT. The variation in SARS-CoV-2 has never stopped. Our findings are useful for the diagnosis and treatment of new SARS-CoV-2 variants that may appear in the future and provide a basis for public health decision-making.

Prospero registration number: CRD42024581869.

Omicron和非Omicron冠状病毒病2019 (COVID-19)患者胸部影像学差异:系统综述和荟萃分析
背景:2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)对人类健康构成了巨大威胁。我们进行系统回顾和荟萃分析有两个目的。首先,通过胸部计算机断层扫描(CT)评估Omicron变体和非Omicron菌株在肺部感染方面的差异;二是评估CT阳性病例中携带Omicron变异株与非Omicron变异株的新冠肺炎患者胸部CT特征的差异。方法:检索PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、China National Knowledge Infrastructure等文献,采用Stata 14.0进行meta分析,采用随机效应模型。结果:我们的研究共纳入了8126例COVID-19患者,其中4113例为Omicron变体,4013例为非Omicron菌株。携带Omicron变异的患者不太可能出现ct阳性(OR = 0.14, 95% CI: 0.08-0.25),并对ct阳性患者进行进一步分析。与非Omicron菌株患者的CT图像相比,Omicron变异患者的肺部特征不典型(OR = 4.02, 95% CI: 2.31-6.98)。此外,患有Omicron变异的患者通常病变主要位于肺中心(OR = 4.51, 95% CI: 1.38-14.76)和单叶(OR = 1.72, 95% CI: 1.10-2.70)。具有Omicron变异的患者双肺病变的可能性较小(OR = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.15-0.69),支气管壁增厚(OR = 1.99, 95% CI: 1.05-3.77)的可能性更大,而出现乱铺路型(OR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.33-0.81)、线性混浊(OR = 0.26, 95% CI: 0.12-0.60)和血管扩张(OR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.35-0.84)的可能性更小。结论:通过meta分析,我们进一步证实了非Omicron菌株患者与Omicron变异患者在胸部CT上的病变分布和表现存在显著差异,这是循证医学最高水平的证据。SARS-CoV-2的变异从未停止过。本研究结果可为未来可能出现的新型SARS-CoV-2变异体的诊断和治疗提供依据,并为公共卫生决策提供依据。普洛斯彼罗注册号:CRD42024581869。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Infectious Diseases
BMC Infectious Diseases 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
860
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: BMC Infectious Diseases is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of infectious and sexually transmitted diseases in humans, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信