A Drug-Coated Balloon Treatment for Urethral Stricture Disease: Three-Year Results from the ROBUST III Study.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Pooja Srikanth, Jessica DeLong, Ramon Virasoro, Sean P Elliott
{"title":"A Drug-Coated Balloon Treatment for Urethral Stricture Disease: Three-Year Results from the ROBUST III Study.","authors":"Pooja Srikanth, Jessica DeLong, Ramon Virasoro, Sean P Elliott","doi":"10.1089/end.2024.0718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> The goal of this study is to report the updated 3-year safety and efficacy outcomes of the intervention arm of the ROBUST III randomized controlled trial, comparing the Optilume® drug-coated balloon (DCB) with standard endoscopic management of recurrent male anterior urethral stricture. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Eligible patients included adult men with recurrent anterior urethral stricture ≤3 cm in length and ≤12 Fr in diameter, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) ≥11, and peak flow rate (Qmax) <15 mL/s. Patients were randomized to treatment with the Optilume DCB or standard-of-care endoscopic management. Primary endpoints evaluated over the 3-year follow-up period included freedom from reintervention and alterations in IPSS, Qmax, and postvoid residual (PVR). The primary safety endpoint was freedom from serious procedure- or device-related adverse events (AEs). <b><i>Results:</i></b> Descriptive statistics of the intervention cohort have been published previously. The treatment arm maintained a high percentage of patients free from repeat intervention (71%), nearly equal to the 2-year results and three times higher than that observed in the control group at the 1-year mark. Clinically significant subgroups, including those with history of repeat endoscopic dilations (≥5 prior dilations) and longer stricture lengths (≥2 cm), did not demonstrate any significant differences in observed metrics, including IPSS score, Qmax, or PVR. In the crossover cohort of patients who experienced treatment failure with standard endoscopic management and opted for DCB treatment, the Kaplan-Meier curve for freedom from reintervention closely resembles that of the original DCB cohort. Treatment-related AEs were rare and generally self-limited (hematuria, dysuria, and urinary tract infection). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The Optilume DCB continues to achieve significant improvements in symptoms and reintervention rates through 3 years posttreatment and represents a viable endoscopic alternative with durable results and a low-risk safety profile for the management of recurrent anterior urethral strictures ≤3 cm in length.</p>","PeriodicalId":15723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endourology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endourology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2024.0718","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The goal of this study is to report the updated 3-year safety and efficacy outcomes of the intervention arm of the ROBUST III randomized controlled trial, comparing the Optilume® drug-coated balloon (DCB) with standard endoscopic management of recurrent male anterior urethral stricture. Methods: Eligible patients included adult men with recurrent anterior urethral stricture ≤3 cm in length and ≤12 Fr in diameter, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) ≥11, and peak flow rate (Qmax) <15 mL/s. Patients were randomized to treatment with the Optilume DCB or standard-of-care endoscopic management. Primary endpoints evaluated over the 3-year follow-up period included freedom from reintervention and alterations in IPSS, Qmax, and postvoid residual (PVR). The primary safety endpoint was freedom from serious procedure- or device-related adverse events (AEs). Results: Descriptive statistics of the intervention cohort have been published previously. The treatment arm maintained a high percentage of patients free from repeat intervention (71%), nearly equal to the 2-year results and three times higher than that observed in the control group at the 1-year mark. Clinically significant subgroups, including those with history of repeat endoscopic dilations (≥5 prior dilations) and longer stricture lengths (≥2 cm), did not demonstrate any significant differences in observed metrics, including IPSS score, Qmax, or PVR. In the crossover cohort of patients who experienced treatment failure with standard endoscopic management and opted for DCB treatment, the Kaplan-Meier curve for freedom from reintervention closely resembles that of the original DCB cohort. Treatment-related AEs were rare and generally self-limited (hematuria, dysuria, and urinary tract infection). Conclusion: The Optilume DCB continues to achieve significant improvements in symptoms and reintervention rates through 3 years posttreatment and represents a viable endoscopic alternative with durable results and a low-risk safety profile for the management of recurrent anterior urethral strictures ≤3 cm in length.

药物包被球囊治疗尿道狭窄疾病:稳健III期研究的3年结果
本研究的目的是报告ROBUST III随机对照试验干预组的最新3年安全性和有效性结果,比较Optilume®药物包被球囊(DCB)与标准内窥镜治疗复发性男性前尿道狭窄的效果。方法:符合条件的患者包括长度≤3cm,直径≤12fr,国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)≥11,峰值流速(Qmax)的成年男性复发性前尿道狭窄患者。结果:干预队列的描述性统计已发表。治疗组保持了高比例的患者没有重复干预(71%),几乎等于2年的结果,是对照组1年观察到的结果的3倍。具有临床意义的亚组,包括有重复内镜扩张史(≥5次既往扩张)和较长的狭窄长度(≥2 cm)的亚组,在观察指标(包括IPSS评分、Qmax或PVR)上没有任何显著差异。在标准内镜治疗失败并选择DCB治疗的患者的交叉队列中,免于再干预的Kaplan-Meier曲线与原始DCB队列非常相似。与治疗相关的不良反应很少见,而且通常是自限性的(血尿、排尿困难和尿路感染)。结论:Optilume DCB治疗3年后,在症状和再干预率方面继续取得显著改善,是治疗长度≤3cm的复发性前尿道狭窄的一种可行的内镜替代方案,具有持久的效果和低风险的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of endourology
Journal of endourology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
14.80%
发文量
254
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Endourology, JE Case Reports, and Videourology are the leading peer-reviewed journal, case reports publication, and innovative videojournal companion covering all aspects of minimally invasive urology research, applications, and clinical outcomes. The leading journal of minimally invasive urology for over 30 years, Journal of Endourology is the essential publication for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest surgical technologies in endoscopic, laparoscopic, robotic, and image-guided procedures as they apply to benign and malignant diseases of the genitourinary tract. This flagship journal includes the companion videojournal Videourology™ with every subscription. While Journal of Endourology remains focused on publishing rigorously peer reviewed articles, Videourology accepts original videos containing material that has not been reported elsewhere, except in the form of an abstract or a conference presentation. Journal of Endourology coverage includes: The latest laparoscopic, robotic, endoscopic, and image-guided techniques for treating both benign and malignant conditions Pioneering research articles Controversial cases in endourology Techniques in endourology with accompanying videos Reviews and epochs in endourology Endourology survey section of endourology relevant manuscripts published in other journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信