Effect of text message reminders to improve paediatric immunisation rates: a randomised controlled quality improvement project.

IF 5.6 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Kyra Rosen, Holly Krelle, William C King, Nathan Klapheke, Paulo Pina, Judd Anderman, Alicia Chung, Felicia Mendoza, Ashley Bagheri, Jay Stadelman, Sarah Tsuruo, Leora Idit Horwitz
{"title":"Effect of text message reminders to improve paediatric immunisation rates: a randomised controlled quality improvement project.","authors":"Kyra Rosen, Holly Krelle, William C King, Nathan Klapheke, Paulo Pina, Judd Anderman, Alicia Chung, Felicia Mendoza, Ashley Bagheri, Jay Stadelman, Sarah Tsuruo, Leora Idit Horwitz","doi":"10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous studies have demonstrated that text message reminders can improve pediatric vaccination rates, including low income & diverse settings such as those served by federally qualified health centers. In this study, we aimed to improve compliance with routine childhood immunizations via a text message intervention in a network of urban, federally qualified health centers at a large academic medical center. We targeted parents or guardians of children aged 0-2 years who were overdue or due within 14 days for at least one routine childhood immunization without a scheduled appointment. In Round 1, two versions of a text were compared to a control (no text). In subsequent Rounds, a new text was compared to a control (no text). In each round the content, wording, and frequency of texts changed. Subjects were randomized to receive a text (treatment group(s)) or to not receive a text (control group) in each round between 2020 and 2022. The primary outcome was whether overdue vaccines had been given by 12 week follow up. The secondary outcome was appointment scheduling within the 72 hours after text messages were sent. In Round 1 (n=1203) no significant differences were found between groups in overdue vaccine administration per group or per patient at follow up, or in appointment scheduling. In Round 2 (n=251) there was no significant difference in vaccine administration per group or per patient. However, significantly more patients in the intervention group scheduled an appointment (9.1% vs. 1.7%, p=0.01). In Round 3 (n=1034), vaccine administration was significantly higher in the intervention group compared to the control overall (7.0% vs. 5.5%, 0.016) and per subject (p=0.02). Significantly more patients in the intervention group scheduled an appointment compared to the control (3.3% vs. 1.2%, p=0.02). We found that text messaging can be an effective intervention to promote health service utilization such as pediatric vaccination rates, which although improved in this study, remain low.</p>","PeriodicalId":9077,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Quality & Safety","volume":"34 5","pages":"339-348"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12013542/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Quality & Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017893","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous studies have demonstrated that text message reminders can improve pediatric vaccination rates, including low income & diverse settings such as those served by federally qualified health centers. In this study, we aimed to improve compliance with routine childhood immunizations via a text message intervention in a network of urban, federally qualified health centers at a large academic medical center. We targeted parents or guardians of children aged 0-2 years who were overdue or due within 14 days for at least one routine childhood immunization without a scheduled appointment. In Round 1, two versions of a text were compared to a control (no text). In subsequent Rounds, a new text was compared to a control (no text). In each round the content, wording, and frequency of texts changed. Subjects were randomized to receive a text (treatment group(s)) or to not receive a text (control group) in each round between 2020 and 2022. The primary outcome was whether overdue vaccines had been given by 12 week follow up. The secondary outcome was appointment scheduling within the 72 hours after text messages were sent. In Round 1 (n=1203) no significant differences were found between groups in overdue vaccine administration per group or per patient at follow up, or in appointment scheduling. In Round 2 (n=251) there was no significant difference in vaccine administration per group or per patient. However, significantly more patients in the intervention group scheduled an appointment (9.1% vs. 1.7%, p=0.01). In Round 3 (n=1034), vaccine administration was significantly higher in the intervention group compared to the control overall (7.0% vs. 5.5%, 0.016) and per subject (p=0.02). Significantly more patients in the intervention group scheduled an appointment compared to the control (3.3% vs. 1.2%, p=0.02). We found that text messaging can be an effective intervention to promote health service utilization such as pediatric vaccination rates, which although improved in this study, remain low.

短信提醒对提高儿童免疫接种率的影响:一个随机控制的质量改进项目。
先前的研究表明,短信提醒可以提高儿科疫苗接种率,包括低收入和不同的环境,如那些由联邦政府合格的卫生中心服务的儿童。在这项研究中,我们的目标是通过短信干预,在一个大型学术医疗中心的城市网络中提高儿童常规免疫接种的依从性。我们的目标是0-2岁儿童的父母或监护人,他们逾期或在14天内应进行至少一次常规儿童免疫接种,而没有安排预约。在第一轮中,将文本的两个版本与对照(没有文本)进行比较。在随后的回合中,将新文本与对照(没有文本)进行比较。在每一轮中,文本的内容、措辞和频率都发生了变化。在2020年至2022年的每一轮中,受试者被随机分配接受文本(治疗组)或不接受文本(对照组)。主要结果是在随访12周时是否接种了过期疫苗。次要结果是短信发送后72小时内的预约安排。在第1轮(n=1203)中,在每组或每例随访患者或预约安排中,各组间未发现显著差异。在第2轮(n=251)中,每组或每个患者的疫苗施用没有显著差异。然而,干预组有更多的患者预约就诊(9.1%比1.7%,p=0.01)。在第3轮(n=1034)中,干预组的疫苗给药率显著高于对照组(7.0% vs. 5.5%, 0.016)和每名受试者(p=0.02)。与对照组相比,干预组有更多的患者预约就诊(3.3% vs. 1.2%, p=0.02)。我们发现,短信可以是一种有效的干预措施,以促进卫生服务的利用,如儿科疫苗接种率,虽然在本研究中有所改善,但仍然很低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Quality & Safety
BMJ Quality & Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
104
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Quality & Safety (previously Quality & Safety in Health Care) is an international peer review publication providing research, opinions, debates and reviews for academics, clinicians and healthcare managers focused on the quality and safety of health care and the science of improvement. The journal receives approximately 1000 manuscripts a year and has an acceptance rate for original research of 12%. Time from submission to first decision averages 22 days and accepted articles are typically published online within 20 days. Its current impact factor is 3.281.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信