Kyra Rosen, Holly Krelle, William C King, Nathan Klapheke, Paulo Pina, Judd Anderman, Alicia Chung, Felicia Mendoza, Ashley Bagheri, Jay Stadelman, Sarah Tsuruo, Leora Idit Horwitz
{"title":"Effect of text message reminders to improve paediatric immunisation rates: a randomised controlled quality improvement project.","authors":"Kyra Rosen, Holly Krelle, William C King, Nathan Klapheke, Paulo Pina, Judd Anderman, Alicia Chung, Felicia Mendoza, Ashley Bagheri, Jay Stadelman, Sarah Tsuruo, Leora Idit Horwitz","doi":"10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous studies have demonstrated that text message reminders can improve pediatric vaccination rates, including low income & diverse settings such as those served by federally qualified health centers. In this study, we aimed to improve compliance with routine childhood immunizations via a text message intervention in a network of urban, federally qualified health centers at a large academic medical center. We targeted parents or guardians of children aged 0-2 years who were overdue or due within 14 days for at least one routine childhood immunization without a scheduled appointment. In Round 1, two versions of a text were compared to a control (no text). In subsequent Rounds, a new text was compared to a control (no text). In each round the content, wording, and frequency of texts changed. Subjects were randomized to receive a text (treatment group(s)) or to not receive a text (control group) in each round between 2020 and 2022. The primary outcome was whether overdue vaccines had been given by 12 week follow up. The secondary outcome was appointment scheduling within the 72 hours after text messages were sent. In Round 1 (n=1203) no significant differences were found between groups in overdue vaccine administration per group or per patient at follow up, or in appointment scheduling. In Round 2 (n=251) there was no significant difference in vaccine administration per group or per patient. However, significantly more patients in the intervention group scheduled an appointment (9.1% vs. 1.7%, p=0.01). In Round 3 (n=1034), vaccine administration was significantly higher in the intervention group compared to the control overall (7.0% vs. 5.5%, 0.016) and per subject (p=0.02). Significantly more patients in the intervention group scheduled an appointment compared to the control (3.3% vs. 1.2%, p=0.02). We found that text messaging can be an effective intervention to promote health service utilization such as pediatric vaccination rates, which although improved in this study, remain low.</p>","PeriodicalId":9077,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Quality & Safety","volume":"34 5","pages":"339-348"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12013542/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Quality & Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017893","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Previous studies have demonstrated that text message reminders can improve pediatric vaccination rates, including low income & diverse settings such as those served by federally qualified health centers. In this study, we aimed to improve compliance with routine childhood immunizations via a text message intervention in a network of urban, federally qualified health centers at a large academic medical center. We targeted parents or guardians of children aged 0-2 years who were overdue or due within 14 days for at least one routine childhood immunization without a scheduled appointment. In Round 1, two versions of a text were compared to a control (no text). In subsequent Rounds, a new text was compared to a control (no text). In each round the content, wording, and frequency of texts changed. Subjects were randomized to receive a text (treatment group(s)) or to not receive a text (control group) in each round between 2020 and 2022. The primary outcome was whether overdue vaccines had been given by 12 week follow up. The secondary outcome was appointment scheduling within the 72 hours after text messages were sent. In Round 1 (n=1203) no significant differences were found between groups in overdue vaccine administration per group or per patient at follow up, or in appointment scheduling. In Round 2 (n=251) there was no significant difference in vaccine administration per group or per patient. However, significantly more patients in the intervention group scheduled an appointment (9.1% vs. 1.7%, p=0.01). In Round 3 (n=1034), vaccine administration was significantly higher in the intervention group compared to the control overall (7.0% vs. 5.5%, 0.016) and per subject (p=0.02). Significantly more patients in the intervention group scheduled an appointment compared to the control (3.3% vs. 1.2%, p=0.02). We found that text messaging can be an effective intervention to promote health service utilization such as pediatric vaccination rates, which although improved in this study, remain low.
先前的研究表明,短信提醒可以提高儿科疫苗接种率,包括低收入和不同的环境,如那些由联邦政府合格的卫生中心服务的儿童。在这项研究中,我们的目标是通过短信干预,在一个大型学术医疗中心的城市网络中提高儿童常规免疫接种的依从性。我们的目标是0-2岁儿童的父母或监护人,他们逾期或在14天内应进行至少一次常规儿童免疫接种,而没有安排预约。在第一轮中,将文本的两个版本与对照(没有文本)进行比较。在随后的回合中,将新文本与对照(没有文本)进行比较。在每一轮中,文本的内容、措辞和频率都发生了变化。在2020年至2022年的每一轮中,受试者被随机分配接受文本(治疗组)或不接受文本(对照组)。主要结果是在随访12周时是否接种了过期疫苗。次要结果是短信发送后72小时内的预约安排。在第1轮(n=1203)中,在每组或每例随访患者或预约安排中,各组间未发现显著差异。在第2轮(n=251)中,每组或每个患者的疫苗施用没有显著差异。然而,干预组有更多的患者预约就诊(9.1%比1.7%,p=0.01)。在第3轮(n=1034)中,干预组的疫苗给药率显著高于对照组(7.0% vs. 5.5%, 0.016)和每名受试者(p=0.02)。与对照组相比,干预组有更多的患者预约就诊(3.3% vs. 1.2%, p=0.02)。我们发现,短信可以是一种有效的干预措施,以促进卫生服务的利用,如儿科疫苗接种率,虽然在本研究中有所改善,但仍然很低。
期刊介绍:
BMJ Quality & Safety (previously Quality & Safety in Health Care) is an international peer review publication providing research, opinions, debates and reviews for academics, clinicians and healthcare managers focused on the quality and safety of health care and the science of improvement.
The journal receives approximately 1000 manuscripts a year and has an acceptance rate for original research of 12%. Time from submission to first decision averages 22 days and accepted articles are typically published online within 20 days. Its current impact factor is 3.281.