Mattice Sablain, Billy Sperlich, Benedikt Meixner, Kevin Caen, Kobe Vermeire, Jan Boone
{"title":"Evaluating the maximal rate of lactate accumulation and estimated maximal lactate steady state in cycling.","authors":"Mattice Sablain, Billy Sperlich, Benedikt Meixner, Kevin Caen, Kobe Vermeire, Jan Boone","doi":"10.1007/s00421-025-05751-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examined the reliability of the maximal rate of blood lactate (BLa<sup>-</sup>) accumulation (VLa<sub>max</sub>) and the, thereof, derived calculated power output at maximal La<sup>-</sup> steady state (cP-MLSS). Additionally, cP-MLSS was compared with the second La<sup>-</sup> thresholds determined by experts (LT<sub>2-expert</sub>), being an accurate and often used threshold concept. 13 physically active male participants (length: 182 ± 4 cm; body mass: 76.3 ± 5.8 kg) completed a step incremental protocol to determine <math> <mrow><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>˙</mo></mover> <msub><mtext>O</mtext> <mrow><mn>2</mn> <mtext>max</mtext></mrow> </msub> </mrow> </math> (60.5 ± 5.8 mL·min<sup>-1</sup>·kg<sup>-1</sup>) and LT<sub>2-expert</sub>. Additionally, a 15-s isokinetic sprint test was conducted on four separate occasions to determine VLa<sub>max</sub>. cP-MLSS was calculated using a mathematical model based on VLa<sub>max</sub>, <math> <mrow><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>˙</mo></mover> <msub><mtext>O</mtext> <mrow><mn>2</mn> <mtext>max</mtext></mrow> </msub> </mrow> </math> and body mass. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and coefficients of variation (CV%) were used to assess reliability. A paired sample T test was used to compare cP-MLSS (mean value of the 4 test days) and LT<sub>2-Expert</sub>. We found good reliability for VLa<sub>max</sub> (ICC = 0.80) and excellent reliability for cP-MLSS (ICC = 0.99). Moreover, LT<sub>2-expert</sub> (277 ± 41 W) and cP-MLSS (282 ± 43 W) were not significantly different. However, comparison revealed relatively wide limits of agreement (-39 to 29 W). This study concludes that VLa<sub>max</sub> and cP-MLSS are reliable measures but need further research and refinement to be used as valid parameters in training and performance contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":12005,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Applied Physiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Applied Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-025-05751-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study examined the reliability of the maximal rate of blood lactate (BLa-) accumulation (VLamax) and the, thereof, derived calculated power output at maximal La- steady state (cP-MLSS). Additionally, cP-MLSS was compared with the second La- thresholds determined by experts (LT2-expert), being an accurate and often used threshold concept. 13 physically active male participants (length: 182 ± 4 cm; body mass: 76.3 ± 5.8 kg) completed a step incremental protocol to determine (60.5 ± 5.8 mL·min-1·kg-1) and LT2-expert. Additionally, a 15-s isokinetic sprint test was conducted on four separate occasions to determine VLamax. cP-MLSS was calculated using a mathematical model based on VLamax, and body mass. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and coefficients of variation (CV%) were used to assess reliability. A paired sample T test was used to compare cP-MLSS (mean value of the 4 test days) and LT2-Expert. We found good reliability for VLamax (ICC = 0.80) and excellent reliability for cP-MLSS (ICC = 0.99). Moreover, LT2-expert (277 ± 41 W) and cP-MLSS (282 ± 43 W) were not significantly different. However, comparison revealed relatively wide limits of agreement (-39 to 29 W). This study concludes that VLamax and cP-MLSS are reliable measures but need further research and refinement to be used as valid parameters in training and performance contexts.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Applied Physiology (EJAP) aims to promote mechanistic advances in human integrative and translational physiology. Physiology is viewed broadly, having overlapping context with related disciplines such as biomechanics, biochemistry, endocrinology, ergonomics, immunology, motor control, and nutrition. EJAP welcomes studies dealing with physical exercise, training and performance. Studies addressing physiological mechanisms are preferred over descriptive studies. Papers dealing with animal models or pathophysiological conditions are not excluded from consideration, but must be clearly relevant to human physiology.