Evaluating the maximal rate of lactate accumulation and estimated maximal lactate steady state in cycling.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 PHYSIOLOGY
Mattice Sablain, Billy Sperlich, Benedikt Meixner, Kevin Caen, Kobe Vermeire, Jan Boone
{"title":"Evaluating the maximal rate of lactate accumulation and estimated maximal lactate steady state in cycling.","authors":"Mattice Sablain, Billy Sperlich, Benedikt Meixner, Kevin Caen, Kobe Vermeire, Jan Boone","doi":"10.1007/s00421-025-05751-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examined the reliability of the maximal rate of blood lactate (BLa<sup>-</sup>) accumulation (VLa<sub>max</sub>) and the, thereof, derived calculated power output at maximal La<sup>-</sup> steady state (cP-MLSS). Additionally, cP-MLSS was compared with the second La<sup>-</sup> thresholds determined by experts (LT<sub>2-expert</sub>), being an accurate and often used threshold concept. 13 physically active male participants (length: 182 ± 4 cm; body mass: 76.3 ± 5.8 kg) completed a step incremental protocol to determine <math> <mrow><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>˙</mo></mover> <msub><mtext>O</mtext> <mrow><mn>2</mn> <mtext>max</mtext></mrow> </msub> </mrow> </math> (60.5 ± 5.8 mL·min<sup>-1</sup>·kg<sup>-1</sup>) and LT<sub>2-expert</sub>. Additionally, a 15-s isokinetic sprint test was conducted on four separate occasions to determine VLa<sub>max</sub>. cP-MLSS was calculated using a mathematical model based on VLa<sub>max</sub>, <math> <mrow><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>˙</mo></mover> <msub><mtext>O</mtext> <mrow><mn>2</mn> <mtext>max</mtext></mrow> </msub> </mrow> </math> and body mass. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and coefficients of variation (CV%) were used to assess reliability. A paired sample T test was used to compare cP-MLSS (mean value of the 4 test days) and LT<sub>2-Expert</sub>. We found good reliability for VLa<sub>max</sub> (ICC = 0.80) and excellent reliability for cP-MLSS (ICC = 0.99). Moreover, LT<sub>2-expert</sub> (277 ± 41 W) and cP-MLSS (282 ± 43 W) were not significantly different. However, comparison revealed relatively wide limits of agreement (-39 to 29 W). This study concludes that VLa<sub>max</sub> and cP-MLSS are reliable measures but need further research and refinement to be used as valid parameters in training and performance contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":12005,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Applied Physiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Applied Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-025-05751-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examined the reliability of the maximal rate of blood lactate (BLa-) accumulation (VLamax) and the, thereof, derived calculated power output at maximal La- steady state (cP-MLSS). Additionally, cP-MLSS was compared with the second La- thresholds determined by experts (LT2-expert), being an accurate and often used threshold concept. 13 physically active male participants (length: 182 ± 4 cm; body mass: 76.3 ± 5.8 kg) completed a step incremental protocol to determine V ˙ O 2 max (60.5 ± 5.8 mL·min-1·kg-1) and LT2-expert. Additionally, a 15-s isokinetic sprint test was conducted on four separate occasions to determine VLamax. cP-MLSS was calculated using a mathematical model based on VLamax, V ˙ O 2 max and body mass. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and coefficients of variation (CV%) were used to assess reliability. A paired sample T test was used to compare cP-MLSS (mean value of the 4 test days) and LT2-Expert. We found good reliability for VLamax (ICC = 0.80) and excellent reliability for cP-MLSS (ICC = 0.99). Moreover, LT2-expert (277 ± 41 W) and cP-MLSS (282 ± 43 W) were not significantly different. However, comparison revealed relatively wide limits of agreement (-39 to 29 W). This study concludes that VLamax and cP-MLSS are reliable measures but need further research and refinement to be used as valid parameters in training and performance contexts.

评估最大乳酸积累率和估计最大乳酸稳态在循环。
本研究检验了最大血乳酸(BLa-)积累率(VLamax)及其在最大乳酸稳态(cP-MLSS)下导出的计算功率输出的可靠性。此外,cP-MLSS与专家确定的第二个La-阈值(LT2-expert)进行了比较,这是一个准确且经常使用的阈值概念。体力活动男性13人(身高182±4cm;体重:76.3±5.8 kg)完成一步递增方案,以确定V˙o2 max(60.5±5.8 mL·min-1·kg-1)和lt2专家。此外,在四个不同的场合进行15秒等速冲刺测试以确定VLamax。cP-MLSS采用基于VLamax、V˙o2 max和体重的数学模型计算。用类内相关系数(ICC)和变异系数(CV%)评估信度。采用配对样本T检验比较cP-MLSS(4个测试天的平均值)和LT2-Expert。我们发现VLamax具有良好的信度(ICC = 0.80), cP-MLSS具有良好的信度(ICC = 0.99)。LT2-expert(277±41 W)与cP-MLSS(282±43 W)无显著差异。然而,比较显示出相对广泛的一致限制(-39至29 W)。本研究得出结论,VLamax和cP-MLSS是可靠的测量方法,但需要进一步研究和改进,以作为训练和绩效背景下的有效参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
227
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Applied Physiology (EJAP) aims to promote mechanistic advances in human integrative and translational physiology. Physiology is viewed broadly, having overlapping context with related disciplines such as biomechanics, biochemistry, endocrinology, ergonomics, immunology, motor control, and nutrition. EJAP welcomes studies dealing with physical exercise, training and performance. Studies addressing physiological mechanisms are preferred over descriptive studies. Papers dealing with animal models or pathophysiological conditions are not excluded from consideration, but must be clearly relevant to human physiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信